影响高收入国家 (HIC) 和中低收入国家 (LMIC) COVID-19 疫苗安全性的供应链因素比较分析。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Manveen Puri, Jeremy H Veillard, Adalsteinn Brown, David Klein
{"title":"影响高收入国家 (HIC) 和中低收入国家 (LMIC) COVID-19 疫苗安全性的供应链因素比较分析。","authors":"Manveen Puri, Jeremy H Veillard, Adalsteinn Brown, David Klein","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic focused attention on the importance of vaccine security to national security. Demand for vaccines far exceeded supply when the first COVID-19 vaccines were released. Growing data suggest a non-perfect correlation among vaccine development, production, purchases, deliveries and vaccination rates. As such, the best approach to strengthening vaccine security remains unclear. In this study, we use an operations research/operations management framework to characterise the relationship between vaccine security and key supply chain predictor variables in high-income countries (HICs) and low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a comparative analysis of vaccine security against eight supply chain variables in a purposive sample of five HICs and five LMICs during the early phase of the pandemic (31 March 2021 and 30 April 2021). All data were obtained from publicly available databases. We used descriptive statistics to characterise our data, basic statistics to compare data and scatter plots to visualise relationships.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our data show greater vaccine security in HICs compared with LMICs (32.2% difference in April 2021; 95% CI 4.2% to 60.3%, p=0.03). We report a significant difference between HICs and LMICs in only two of the eight predictor variables studied. Interestingly, we observed large variation in vaccine security <i>within</i> HICs, with Canada, Israel and Japan being frequent outliers, and within LMICs, with India standing out.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest a stronger relationship between vaccine security and 'downstream' supply chain variables compared with 'upstream' variables. However, multiple outliers and the lack of an even stronger relationship suggests that there is no magic bullet for vaccine security. To boost vaccine resilience, countries must be well governed and strategically reinforce deficient aspects of their supply chains. Modest strength in multiple domains may be the best approach to counteracting the effect of an unfamiliar, novel pathogen.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"9 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11551981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of supply chain factors impacting COVID-19 vaccine security in high-income countries (HICs) and low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).\",\"authors\":\"Manveen Puri, Jeremy H Veillard, Adalsteinn Brown, David Klein\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic focused attention on the importance of vaccine security to national security. Demand for vaccines far exceeded supply when the first COVID-19 vaccines were released. Growing data suggest a non-perfect correlation among vaccine development, production, purchases, deliveries and vaccination rates. As such, the best approach to strengthening vaccine security remains unclear. In this study, we use an operations research/operations management framework to characterise the relationship between vaccine security and key supply chain predictor variables in high-income countries (HICs) and low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a comparative analysis of vaccine security against eight supply chain variables in a purposive sample of five HICs and five LMICs during the early phase of the pandemic (31 March 2021 and 30 April 2021). All data were obtained from publicly available databases. We used descriptive statistics to characterise our data, basic statistics to compare data and scatter plots to visualise relationships.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our data show greater vaccine security in HICs compared with LMICs (32.2% difference in April 2021; 95% CI 4.2% to 60.3%, p=0.03). We report a significant difference between HICs and LMICs in only two of the eight predictor variables studied. Interestingly, we observed large variation in vaccine security <i>within</i> HICs, with Canada, Israel and Japan being frequent outliers, and within LMICs, with India standing out.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest a stronger relationship between vaccine security and 'downstream' supply chain variables compared with 'upstream' variables. However, multiple outliers and the lack of an even stronger relationship suggests that there is no magic bullet for vaccine security. To boost vaccine resilience, countries must be well governed and strategically reinforce deficient aspects of their supply chains. Modest strength in multiple domains may be the best approach to counteracting the effect of an unfamiliar, novel pathogen.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"9 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11551981/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015136\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015136","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:COVID-19 大流行将人们的注意力集中在疫苗安全对国家安全的重要性上。在第一批 COVID-19 疫苗上市时,疫苗的需求量远远超过了供应量。越来越多的数据表明,疫苗的研发、生产、采购、交付和接种率之间并不完全相关。因此,加强疫苗安全的最佳方法仍不明确。在本研究中,我们使用了运营研究/运营管理框架来描述高收入国家(HICs)和中低收入国家(LMICs)的疫苗安全与关键供应链预测变量之间的关系:我们对疫苗大流行早期阶段(2021 年 3 月 31 日和 2021 年 4 月 30 日)五个高收入国家和五个中低收入国家的疫苗安全性与八个供应链变量进行了比较分析。所有数据均来自公开数据库。我们使用描述性统计来描述数据特征,使用基本统计来比较数据,使用散点图来直观地显示数据关系:我们的数据显示,与低收入国家相比,高收入国家的疫苗安全性更高(2021 年 4 月的差异为 32.2%;95% CI 为 4.2% 至 60.3%,P=0.03)。在我们研究的八个预测变量中,只有两个变量在高收入国家和低收入国家之间存在明显差异。有趣的是,我们观察到高收入国家和低收入国家在疫苗安全性方面存在很大差异,加拿大、以色列和日本经常是异常值,而在低收入国家和低收入国家中,印度则比较突出:我们的数据表明,与 "上游 "变量相比,疫苗安全性与 "下游 "供应链变量之间的关系更为密切。然而,多个异常值和缺乏更强的关系表明,疫苗安全没有灵丹妙药。要提高疫苗的抗风险能力,各国必须进行良好的管理,并从战略上加强其供应链的不足之处。在多个领域保持适度的优势可能是抵御陌生的新型病原体影响的最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative analysis of supply chain factors impacting COVID-19 vaccine security in high-income countries (HICs) and low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic focused attention on the importance of vaccine security to national security. Demand for vaccines far exceeded supply when the first COVID-19 vaccines were released. Growing data suggest a non-perfect correlation among vaccine development, production, purchases, deliveries and vaccination rates. As such, the best approach to strengthening vaccine security remains unclear. In this study, we use an operations research/operations management framework to characterise the relationship between vaccine security and key supply chain predictor variables in high-income countries (HICs) and low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Methods: We performed a comparative analysis of vaccine security against eight supply chain variables in a purposive sample of five HICs and five LMICs during the early phase of the pandemic (31 March 2021 and 30 April 2021). All data were obtained from publicly available databases. We used descriptive statistics to characterise our data, basic statistics to compare data and scatter plots to visualise relationships.

Results: Our data show greater vaccine security in HICs compared with LMICs (32.2% difference in April 2021; 95% CI 4.2% to 60.3%, p=0.03). We report a significant difference between HICs and LMICs in only two of the eight predictor variables studied. Interestingly, we observed large variation in vaccine security within HICs, with Canada, Israel and Japan being frequent outliers, and within LMICs, with India standing out.

Conclusion: Our data suggest a stronger relationship between vaccine security and 'downstream' supply chain variables compared with 'upstream' variables. However, multiple outliers and the lack of an even stronger relationship suggests that there is no magic bullet for vaccine security. To boost vaccine resilience, countries must be well governed and strategically reinforce deficient aspects of their supply chains. Modest strength in multiple domains may be the best approach to counteracting the effect of an unfamiliar, novel pathogen.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信