{"title":"小棉签和大棉签在鼻气管插管中消毒效果的微生物学比较:随机试验。","authors":"Makoto Hirohata, Naoko Tachi, Yuji Kamimura, Yoshiki Sento, Eisuke Kako, Hiroshi Hoshijima, Masahiro Okuda, Shota Tsukimoto, Kyoko Shida, Hidetaka Kuroda, Takuro Sanuki, Yuka Kikuchi, Kazuya Sobue, Yoshiaki Hasegawa, Aiji Sato-Boku","doi":"10.1186/s12871-024-02804-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nasotracheal intubation (NTI) is necessary during surgeries requiring clear access to the surgical field and in patients with respiratory issues. This study investigates the pre-NTI nasal disinfection efficacy of different cotton swab sizes, hypothesizing that smaller swabs could minimize bleeding while maintaining disinfection efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists-physical status (ASA-PS) class 1 or 2 scheduled for general anesthesia with NTI were randomly assigned to either a large cotton swabs (LCS) or fine cotton swabs (FCS) group in this randomized controlled trial (RCT).\" After anesthesia, a fine cotton swab was inserted into the inferior nasal meatus in both groups to collect bacteria (sample A). Next, the nasal cavity was disinfected with LCS or FCS according to the patient group. Bacteria were collected by inserting a fine cotton swab into the inferior nasal meatus (sample B). After surgery, bacteria were collected from the endotracheal tube tip using a fine cotton swab in both groups (sample C). The samples were cultured for 24 hours, and the colonies from samples A-C were counted. The changes in bacteria count between samples A and B and samples A and C were determined. Nasal bleeding from cotton swab insertion was assessed as a secondary outcome. Student's t-tests, a chi-square independence test, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for the statistical analysis. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between samples A and B, the change in bacteria count was 7.2% (1.4-26.1%) (median[interquartile range]) in the LCS group and 6.9% (0.9-22%) in the FCS group (p = 0.90). Between samples A and C, the change in bacteria count was 7.5% (0.2-44%) in the LCS group and 8.3% (0.3-39%) in the FCS group (p = 0.55). We examined 62 subjects in each group (LCS and FCS), and samples A, B, and C were collected from all participants in both groups. Nasal bleeding occurred in 42/62 in the LCS group and 22/62 in the FCS group (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cotton swab thickness did not impact disinfection efficacy, but large swabs increased the risk of nasal bleeding. We recommend FCS for nasal disinfection prior to NTI in ASA 1-2 patients, as they reduce bleeding risk without compromising disinfection.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>UMIN-CTR (registration no. UMIN000051495), June 30, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"24 1","pages":"414"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbiological comparison of the disinfecting efficacy of small and large cotton swabs in nasotracheal intubation: a randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"Makoto Hirohata, Naoko Tachi, Yuji Kamimura, Yoshiki Sento, Eisuke Kako, Hiroshi Hoshijima, Masahiro Okuda, Shota Tsukimoto, Kyoko Shida, Hidetaka Kuroda, Takuro Sanuki, Yuka Kikuchi, Kazuya Sobue, Yoshiaki Hasegawa, Aiji Sato-Boku\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-024-02804-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nasotracheal intubation (NTI) is necessary during surgeries requiring clear access to the surgical field and in patients with respiratory issues. This study investigates the pre-NTI nasal disinfection efficacy of different cotton swab sizes, hypothesizing that smaller swabs could minimize bleeding while maintaining disinfection efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists-physical status (ASA-PS) class 1 or 2 scheduled for general anesthesia with NTI were randomly assigned to either a large cotton swabs (LCS) or fine cotton swabs (FCS) group in this randomized controlled trial (RCT).\\\" After anesthesia, a fine cotton swab was inserted into the inferior nasal meatus in both groups to collect bacteria (sample A). Next, the nasal cavity was disinfected with LCS or FCS according to the patient group. Bacteria were collected by inserting a fine cotton swab into the inferior nasal meatus (sample B). After surgery, bacteria were collected from the endotracheal tube tip using a fine cotton swab in both groups (sample C). The samples were cultured for 24 hours, and the colonies from samples A-C were counted. The changes in bacteria count between samples A and B and samples A and C were determined. Nasal bleeding from cotton swab insertion was assessed as a secondary outcome. Student's t-tests, a chi-square independence test, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for the statistical analysis. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between samples A and B, the change in bacteria count was 7.2% (1.4-26.1%) (median[interquartile range]) in the LCS group and 6.9% (0.9-22%) in the FCS group (p = 0.90). Between samples A and C, the change in bacteria count was 7.5% (0.2-44%) in the LCS group and 8.3% (0.3-39%) in the FCS group (p = 0.55). We examined 62 subjects in each group (LCS and FCS), and samples A, B, and C were collected from all participants in both groups. Nasal bleeding occurred in 42/62 in the LCS group and 22/62 in the FCS group (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cotton swab thickness did not impact disinfection efficacy, but large swabs increased the risk of nasal bleeding. We recommend FCS for nasal disinfection prior to NTI in ASA 1-2 patients, as they reduce bleeding risk without compromising disinfection.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>UMIN-CTR (registration no. UMIN000051495), June 30, 2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"414\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562498/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02804-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02804-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:鼻气管插管(NTI)是外科手术和有呼吸系统问题的患者在手术过程中必须进行的操作。本研究调查了不同大小棉签在 NTI 前的鼻腔消毒效果,假设较小的棉签可以在保持消毒效果的同时最大限度地减少出血:在这项随机对照试验(RCT)中,被归类为美国麻醉医师协会身体状况(ASA-PS)1 级或 2 级、计划接受 NTI 全身麻醉的患者被随机分配到大棉签(LCS)组或细棉签(FCS)组。麻醉后,两组患者都将细棉拭子插入下鼻孔收集细菌(样本 A)。然后,根据患者组别使用 LCS 或 FCS 对鼻腔进行消毒。用细棉签插入下鼻孔收集细菌(样本 B)。手术后,两组患者均使用细棉拭子从气管导管尖端收集细菌(样本 C)。将样本培养 24 小时,并对样本 A-C 中的菌落进行计数。确定样本 A 和样本 B 之间以及样本 A 和样本 C 之间细菌数量的变化。棉签插入造成的鼻出血作为次要结果进行评估。统计分析采用了学生 t 检验、卡方独立性检验和曼-惠特尼 U 检验。统计显著性水平设定为 p:在样本 A 和 B 之间,LCS 组的细菌数变化率为 7.2%(1.4-26.1%)(中位数[四分位数间距]),FCS 组为 6.9%(0.9-22%)(p = 0.90)。在样本 A 和 C 之间,LCS 组细菌数的变化为 7.5%(0.2-44%),FCS 组为 8.3%(0.3-39%)(p = 0.55)。我们对每组(LCS 组和 FCS 组)的 62 名受试者进行了检查,并从两组的所有参与者身上采集了样本 A、B 和 C。LCS 组中有 42/62 人出现鼻出血,FCS 组中有 22/62 人出现鼻出血(P=0.55):棉签厚度不会影响消毒效果,但大棉签会增加鼻出血的风险。我们建议 ASA 1-2 患者在进行 NTI 之前使用 FCS 进行鼻腔消毒,因为它们能在不影响消毒的情况下降低出血风险:UMIN-CTR(注册号:UMIN000051495),2023 年 6 月 30 日。
Microbiological comparison of the disinfecting efficacy of small and large cotton swabs in nasotracheal intubation: a randomized trial.
Background: Nasotracheal intubation (NTI) is necessary during surgeries requiring clear access to the surgical field and in patients with respiratory issues. This study investigates the pre-NTI nasal disinfection efficacy of different cotton swab sizes, hypothesizing that smaller swabs could minimize bleeding while maintaining disinfection efficacy.
Methods: Patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists-physical status (ASA-PS) class 1 or 2 scheduled for general anesthesia with NTI were randomly assigned to either a large cotton swabs (LCS) or fine cotton swabs (FCS) group in this randomized controlled trial (RCT)." After anesthesia, a fine cotton swab was inserted into the inferior nasal meatus in both groups to collect bacteria (sample A). Next, the nasal cavity was disinfected with LCS or FCS according to the patient group. Bacteria were collected by inserting a fine cotton swab into the inferior nasal meatus (sample B). After surgery, bacteria were collected from the endotracheal tube tip using a fine cotton swab in both groups (sample C). The samples were cultured for 24 hours, and the colonies from samples A-C were counted. The changes in bacteria count between samples A and B and samples A and C were determined. Nasal bleeding from cotton swab insertion was assessed as a secondary outcome. Student's t-tests, a chi-square independence test, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for the statistical analysis. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05.
Results: Between samples A and B, the change in bacteria count was 7.2% (1.4-26.1%) (median[interquartile range]) in the LCS group and 6.9% (0.9-22%) in the FCS group (p = 0.90). Between samples A and C, the change in bacteria count was 7.5% (0.2-44%) in the LCS group and 8.3% (0.3-39%) in the FCS group (p = 0.55). We examined 62 subjects in each group (LCS and FCS), and samples A, B, and C were collected from all participants in both groups. Nasal bleeding occurred in 42/62 in the LCS group and 22/62 in the FCS group (p < 0.01).
Conclusion: Cotton swab thickness did not impact disinfection efficacy, but large swabs increased the risk of nasal bleeding. We recommend FCS for nasal disinfection prior to NTI in ASA 1-2 patients, as they reduce bleeding risk without compromising disinfection.
Trial registration: UMIN-CTR (registration no. UMIN000051495), June 30, 2023.
期刊介绍:
BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.