基于 MissForest 的新型缺失值估算方法与医疗应用中的递归特征消除。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ya-Han Hu, Ruei-Yan Wu, Yen-Cheng Lin, Ting-Yin Lin
{"title":"基于 MissForest 的新型缺失值估算方法与医疗应用中的递归特征消除。","authors":"Ya-Han Hu, Ruei-Yan Wu, Yen-Cheng Lin, Ting-Yin Lin","doi":"10.1186/s12874-024-02392-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Missing values in datasets present significant challenges for data analysis, particularly in the medical field where data accuracy is crucial for patient diagnosis and treatment. Although MissForest (MF) has demonstrated efficacy in imputation research and recursive feature elimination (RFE) has proven effective in feature selection, the potential for enhancing MF through RFE integration remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study introduces a novel imputation method, \"recursive feature elimination-MissForest\" (RFE-MF), designed to enhance imputation quality by reducing the impact of irrelevant features. A comparative analysis is conducted between RFE-MF and four classical imputation methods: mean/mode, k-nearest neighbors (kNN), multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE), and MF. The comparison is carried out across ten medical datasets containing both numerical and mixed data types. Different missing data rates, ranging from 10 to 50%, are evaluated under the missing completely at random (MCAR) mechanism. The performance of each method is assessed using two evaluation metrics: normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) and predictive fidelity criterion (PFC). Additionally, paired samples t-tests are employed to analyze the statistical significance of differences among the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings indicate that RFE-MF demonstrates superior performance across the majority of datasets when compared to four classical imputation methods (mean/mode, kNN, MICE, and MF). Notably, RFE-MF consistently outperforms the original MF, irrespective of variable type (numerical or categorical). Mean/mode imputation exhibits consistent performance across various scenarios. Conversely, the efficacy of kNN imputation fluctuates in relation to varying missing data rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that RFE-MF holds promise as an effective imputation method for medical datasets, providing a novel approach to addressing missing data challenges in medical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":"24 1","pages":"269"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel MissForest-based missing values imputation approach with recursive feature elimination in medical applications.\",\"authors\":\"Ya-Han Hu, Ruei-Yan Wu, Yen-Cheng Lin, Ting-Yin Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12874-024-02392-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Missing values in datasets present significant challenges for data analysis, particularly in the medical field where data accuracy is crucial for patient diagnosis and treatment. Although MissForest (MF) has demonstrated efficacy in imputation research and recursive feature elimination (RFE) has proven effective in feature selection, the potential for enhancing MF through RFE integration remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study introduces a novel imputation method, \\\"recursive feature elimination-MissForest\\\" (RFE-MF), designed to enhance imputation quality by reducing the impact of irrelevant features. A comparative analysis is conducted between RFE-MF and four classical imputation methods: mean/mode, k-nearest neighbors (kNN), multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE), and MF. The comparison is carried out across ten medical datasets containing both numerical and mixed data types. Different missing data rates, ranging from 10 to 50%, are evaluated under the missing completely at random (MCAR) mechanism. The performance of each method is assessed using two evaluation metrics: normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) and predictive fidelity criterion (PFC). Additionally, paired samples t-tests are employed to analyze the statistical significance of differences among the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings indicate that RFE-MF demonstrates superior performance across the majority of datasets when compared to four classical imputation methods (mean/mode, kNN, MICE, and MF). Notably, RFE-MF consistently outperforms the original MF, irrespective of variable type (numerical or categorical). Mean/mode imputation exhibits consistent performance across various scenarios. Conversely, the efficacy of kNN imputation fluctuates in relation to varying missing data rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that RFE-MF holds promise as an effective imputation method for medical datasets, providing a novel approach to addressing missing data challenges in medical applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546113/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02392-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02392-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:数据集中的缺失值给数据分析带来了巨大挑战,尤其是在医疗领域,数据的准确性对病人的诊断和治疗至关重要。尽管 MissForest(MF)已在归因研究中证明了其有效性,递归特征消除(RFE)也已在特征选择中证明了其有效性,但通过整合 RFE 来增强 MF 的潜力仍有待探索:本研究介绍了一种新的估算方法 "递归特征剔除-MissForest"(RFE-MF),旨在通过减少无关特征的影响来提高估算质量。RFE-MF 与四种经典估算方法进行了比较分析:均值/模式、k-近邻(kNN)、链式方程多重估算(MICE)和 MF。比较在包含数字和混合数据类型的十个医疗数据集上进行。在完全随机缺失(MCAR)机制下,对从 10%到 50%的不同数据缺失率进行了评估。每种方法的性能使用两个评估指标进行评估:归一化均方根误差(NRMSE)和预测保真度标准(PFC)。此外,还采用配对样本 t 检验来分析结果之间差异的统计学意义:结果:研究结果表明,与四种经典估算方法(均值/模式、kNN、MICE 和 MF)相比,RFE-MF 在大多数数据集上都表现出卓越的性能。值得注意的是,无论变量类型(数字或分类)如何,RFE-MF 的性能始终优于原始 MF。平均/模式估算在各种情况下都表现出一致的性能。相反,kNN 归因的功效会随着数据缺失率的变化而波动:这项研究表明,RFE-MF 有望成为医疗数据集的一种有效估算方法,为解决医疗应用中的数据缺失难题提供了一种新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A novel MissForest-based missing values imputation approach with recursive feature elimination in medical applications.

Background: Missing values in datasets present significant challenges for data analysis, particularly in the medical field where data accuracy is crucial for patient diagnosis and treatment. Although MissForest (MF) has demonstrated efficacy in imputation research and recursive feature elimination (RFE) has proven effective in feature selection, the potential for enhancing MF through RFE integration remains unexplored.

Methods: This study introduces a novel imputation method, "recursive feature elimination-MissForest" (RFE-MF), designed to enhance imputation quality by reducing the impact of irrelevant features. A comparative analysis is conducted between RFE-MF and four classical imputation methods: mean/mode, k-nearest neighbors (kNN), multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE), and MF. The comparison is carried out across ten medical datasets containing both numerical and mixed data types. Different missing data rates, ranging from 10 to 50%, are evaluated under the missing completely at random (MCAR) mechanism. The performance of each method is assessed using two evaluation metrics: normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) and predictive fidelity criterion (PFC). Additionally, paired samples t-tests are employed to analyze the statistical significance of differences among the outcomes.

Results: The findings indicate that RFE-MF demonstrates superior performance across the majority of datasets when compared to four classical imputation methods (mean/mode, kNN, MICE, and MF). Notably, RFE-MF consistently outperforms the original MF, irrespective of variable type (numerical or categorical). Mean/mode imputation exhibits consistent performance across various scenarios. Conversely, the efficacy of kNN imputation fluctuates in relation to varying missing data rates.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that RFE-MF holds promise as an effective imputation method for medical datasets, providing a novel approach to addressing missing data challenges in medical applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
298
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信