通过远程医疗服务预防自杀:危机应对计划和自我指导安全规划方法随机对照试验的启示。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Monika Lohani, Justin C Baker, Jamie S Elsey, Sam Dutton, Samuel P Findley, Scott A Langenecker, Amy S Do, Craig J Bryan
{"title":"通过远程医疗服务预防自杀:危机应对计划和自我指导安全规划方法随机对照试验的启示。","authors":"Monika Lohani, Justin C Baker, Jamie S Elsey, Sam Dutton, Samuel P Findley, Scott A Langenecker, Amy S Do, Craig J Bryan","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11739-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although telemental health can make suicide prevention treatments more scalable and accessible, limited evidence demonstrates successful reductions in suicidality when interventions are administered through telehealth platforms. To address this limitation, the current work investigated the effects of two suicide prevention treatments - a clinician-guided Crisis Response Plan and a self-guided Safety Planning approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After completing the screening process, 82 participants with high suicide ideation and/or a lifetime history of suicidal behavior were randomly assigned across the two groups. Trained research clinicians administered the interventions using a videoconferencing platform. After the intervention delivery was complete, participants reported the therapeutic alliance they experienced with their clinician using an online survey. Participants also reported their overall suicidality 45 days after receiving the intervention. In addition, participants' perceived usefulness of the received intervention and actual use of the plan were recorded. Linear and logistic regression models predicted how suicidality, perceived utility, and actual use of their intervention protocols varied depending on the high (Crisis Response Plan) versus low (self-guided Safety Planning) level of clinician-led collaboration the two treatments entailed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both Crisis Response Plan and self-guided Safety Planning were found to lower suicidality after receiving them via telehealth services. At the same time, those who received the Crisis Response Plan (the more collaborative form of therapy) reported experiencing a stronger therapeutic alliance with the clinician, utilizing the plan more often and perceiving it as more useful. These findings demonstrate the additional benefits of adopting a more collaborative approach because of its effectiveness and perceived utility, which has implications for suicide-related distress reduction in the short and long term.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence from this randomized control trial suggests that Crisis Response Plan is a suitable candidate for delivering suicide prevention via telehealth platform because of its effectiveness in reducing suicidality and its collaborative approach to building a strong therapeutic alliance, perceived usefulness, and actual utility in everyday life.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This paper was part of a registered RCT: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04888845 . Registration date: Date: 2021-04-22.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"1389"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suicide prevention via telemental health services: insights from a randomized control trial of crisis response plan and self-guided safety planning approaches.\",\"authors\":\"Monika Lohani, Justin C Baker, Jamie S Elsey, Sam Dutton, Samuel P Findley, Scott A Langenecker, Amy S Do, Craig J Bryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-024-11739-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although telemental health can make suicide prevention treatments more scalable and accessible, limited evidence demonstrates successful reductions in suicidality when interventions are administered through telehealth platforms. To address this limitation, the current work investigated the effects of two suicide prevention treatments - a clinician-guided Crisis Response Plan and a self-guided Safety Planning approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After completing the screening process, 82 participants with high suicide ideation and/or a lifetime history of suicidal behavior were randomly assigned across the two groups. Trained research clinicians administered the interventions using a videoconferencing platform. After the intervention delivery was complete, participants reported the therapeutic alliance they experienced with their clinician using an online survey. Participants also reported their overall suicidality 45 days after receiving the intervention. In addition, participants' perceived usefulness of the received intervention and actual use of the plan were recorded. Linear and logistic regression models predicted how suicidality, perceived utility, and actual use of their intervention protocols varied depending on the high (Crisis Response Plan) versus low (self-guided Safety Planning) level of clinician-led collaboration the two treatments entailed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both Crisis Response Plan and self-guided Safety Planning were found to lower suicidality after receiving them via telehealth services. At the same time, those who received the Crisis Response Plan (the more collaborative form of therapy) reported experiencing a stronger therapeutic alliance with the clinician, utilizing the plan more often and perceiving it as more useful. These findings demonstrate the additional benefits of adopting a more collaborative approach because of its effectiveness and perceived utility, which has implications for suicide-related distress reduction in the short and long term.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence from this randomized control trial suggests that Crisis Response Plan is a suitable candidate for delivering suicide prevention via telehealth platform because of its effectiveness in reducing suicidality and its collaborative approach to building a strong therapeutic alliance, perceived usefulness, and actual utility in everyday life.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This paper was part of a registered RCT: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04888845 . Registration date: Date: 2021-04-22.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"1389\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559151/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11739-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11739-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然远程医疗可以使自杀预防治疗更具扩展性和可及性,但通过远程医疗平台实施干预时成功降低自杀率的证据有限。为了解决这一局限性,目前的研究工作调查了两种自杀预防治疗方法--临床医生指导的危机应对计划和自我指导的安全规划方法--的效果:完成筛查程序后,82 名有强烈自杀意念和/或终生自杀行为史的参与者被随机分配到两组中。经过培训的研究临床医生通过视频会议平台实施干预。干预结束后,参与者通过在线调查报告了他们与临床医生之间的治疗联盟关系。参与者还报告了他们在接受干预 45 天后的总体自杀情况。此外,还记录了参与者对所接受干预的有用性的感知以及计划的实际使用情况。线性回归模型和逻辑回归模型预测了自杀率、感知有用性和干预方案的实际使用情况如何因两种治疗方法所需的临床医生主导合作程度高(危机应对计划)与低(自我指导的安全规划)而不同:结果:通过远程医疗服务接受危机应对计划和自我指导安全计划治疗后,自杀率都有所下降。同时,接受危机应对计划(协作性更强的治疗形式)治疗的患者表示,他们与临床医生之间的治疗联盟更牢固,更经常使用该计划,并认为该计划更有用。这些研究结果表明,采用合作性更强的方法会带来更多益处,因为这种方法既有效又实用,从短期和长期来看,这对减少与自杀有关的痛苦都有意义:这项随机对照试验的证据表明,"危机应对计划 "是通过远程医疗平台提供自杀预防服务的合适候选方案,因为它能有效减少自杀倾向,并能通过合作的方式建立牢固的治疗联盟、感知有用性以及在日常生活中的实际效用:本文是注册 RCT 的一部分:https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04888845 。注册日期: 日期:2021-04-22.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Suicide prevention via telemental health services: insights from a randomized control trial of crisis response plan and self-guided safety planning approaches.

Background: Although telemental health can make suicide prevention treatments more scalable and accessible, limited evidence demonstrates successful reductions in suicidality when interventions are administered through telehealth platforms. To address this limitation, the current work investigated the effects of two suicide prevention treatments - a clinician-guided Crisis Response Plan and a self-guided Safety Planning approach.

Methods: After completing the screening process, 82 participants with high suicide ideation and/or a lifetime history of suicidal behavior were randomly assigned across the two groups. Trained research clinicians administered the interventions using a videoconferencing platform. After the intervention delivery was complete, participants reported the therapeutic alliance they experienced with their clinician using an online survey. Participants also reported their overall suicidality 45 days after receiving the intervention. In addition, participants' perceived usefulness of the received intervention and actual use of the plan were recorded. Linear and logistic regression models predicted how suicidality, perceived utility, and actual use of their intervention protocols varied depending on the high (Crisis Response Plan) versus low (self-guided Safety Planning) level of clinician-led collaboration the two treatments entailed.

Results: Both Crisis Response Plan and self-guided Safety Planning were found to lower suicidality after receiving them via telehealth services. At the same time, those who received the Crisis Response Plan (the more collaborative form of therapy) reported experiencing a stronger therapeutic alliance with the clinician, utilizing the plan more often and perceiving it as more useful. These findings demonstrate the additional benefits of adopting a more collaborative approach because of its effectiveness and perceived utility, which has implications for suicide-related distress reduction in the short and long term.

Conclusions: Evidence from this randomized control trial suggests that Crisis Response Plan is a suitable candidate for delivering suicide prevention via telehealth platform because of its effectiveness in reducing suicidality and its collaborative approach to building a strong therapeutic alliance, perceived usefulness, and actual utility in everyday life.

Trial registration: This paper was part of a registered RCT: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04888845 . Registration date: Date: 2021-04-22.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信