在加拿大的精神健康机构中,为患有严重精神疾病的老年人增加与复苏状态相关的护理目标讨论:一项回顾性研究。

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Cristina de Lasa, Elnathan Mesfin, Tania Tajirian, Caroline Chessex, Brian Lo, Sanjeev Sockalingam
{"title":"在加拿大的精神健康机构中,为患有严重精神疾病的老年人增加与复苏状态相关的护理目标讨论:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Cristina de Lasa, Elnathan Mesfin, Tania Tajirian, Caroline Chessex, Brian Lo, Sanjeev Sockalingam","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults with severe mental illness, including advanced dementia (AD), within geriatric admission units (GAU) often prioritise comfort care, avoiding life-prolonging procedures including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Pre-2019, hospital policy lacked a resuscitation status order (RSO) incorporating distinct do-not-resuscitate levels. Providers entered 'NO CPR' orders in the electronic health record (EHR), necessitating transfers for non-CPR medical issues, contradicting patient preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study aimed for a 75% increase in resuscitation status-related (RSR) goals of care discussion (GOCD) completion rates within 1 week of GAU admission or transfer by December 2022. We implemented an EHR RSO, updated hospital policy and provided staff education. A 4-year GAU retrospective chart review assessed RSR GOCD frequency, completion time, documentation quality and discrepancies. Additionally, an environmental scan identified contributing factors to RSR GOCD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 431 reviewed charts, the mean RSR GOCD completion rate was 13.9%; taking 39.5 days, with extreme outliers removed, the mean of time to completion was 15 days. Subgroup analysis highlighted a significant difference in RSR GOCD completion rates for AD (41.6%) compared with non-AD patients (16.3%). Discrepancy rates in charts with RSR GOCD were substantial: documentation without a corresponding RSO (66.7%), RSO without documentation (26.1%) and discordant resuscitation status between documentation and RSO (7.2%). Documentation quality varied: 32.9% lacked context, 20.7% had limited context, while 46.3% provided comprehensive context. Barriers to RSR GOCD included the absence of an EHR documentation tool and clear triggers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RSR GOCD completion rates were lower and took longer than anticipated, highlighting improvement opportunities. AD subgroup analysis indicated provider awareness of RSR GOCD importance in this population. Discrepancies and documentation quality issues pose risks to patient-centred care. Collaborative stakeholder efforts are imperative for developing system-based informatics solutions, ensuring timely, comprehensive and patient-centred RSR GOCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555105/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increasing resuscitation status-related goals of care discussions for older adults with severe mental illness in a Canadian mental health setting: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Cristina de Lasa, Elnathan Mesfin, Tania Tajirian, Caroline Chessex, Brian Lo, Sanjeev Sockalingam\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults with severe mental illness, including advanced dementia (AD), within geriatric admission units (GAU) often prioritise comfort care, avoiding life-prolonging procedures including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Pre-2019, hospital policy lacked a resuscitation status order (RSO) incorporating distinct do-not-resuscitate levels. Providers entered 'NO CPR' orders in the electronic health record (EHR), necessitating transfers for non-CPR medical issues, contradicting patient preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study aimed for a 75% increase in resuscitation status-related (RSR) goals of care discussion (GOCD) completion rates within 1 week of GAU admission or transfer by December 2022. We implemented an EHR RSO, updated hospital policy and provided staff education. A 4-year GAU retrospective chart review assessed RSR GOCD frequency, completion time, documentation quality and discrepancies. Additionally, an environmental scan identified contributing factors to RSR GOCD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 431 reviewed charts, the mean RSR GOCD completion rate was 13.9%; taking 39.5 days, with extreme outliers removed, the mean of time to completion was 15 days. Subgroup analysis highlighted a significant difference in RSR GOCD completion rates for AD (41.6%) compared with non-AD patients (16.3%). Discrepancy rates in charts with RSR GOCD were substantial: documentation without a corresponding RSO (66.7%), RSO without documentation (26.1%) and discordant resuscitation status between documentation and RSO (7.2%). Documentation quality varied: 32.9% lacked context, 20.7% had limited context, while 46.3% provided comprehensive context. Barriers to RSR GOCD included the absence of an EHR documentation tool and clear triggers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RSR GOCD completion rates were lower and took longer than anticipated, highlighting improvement opportunities. AD subgroup analysis indicated provider awareness of RSR GOCD importance in this population. Discrepancies and documentation quality issues pose risks to patient-centred care. Collaborative stakeholder efforts are imperative for developing system-based informatics solutions, ensuring timely, comprehensive and patient-centred RSR GOCD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555105/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002798\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在老年病入院病房(GAU)中,患有严重精神疾病(包括晚期痴呆症(AD))的老年人通常会优先考虑舒适护理,避免包括心肺复苏(CPR)在内的延长生命的程序。在 2019 年之前,医院政策中没有包含明确的 "不进行复苏 "级别的复苏状态指令 (RSO)。医护人员在电子病历(EHR)中输入 "无 CPR "医嘱,导致因非 CPR 医疗问题而必须转院,这与患者的偏好相悖:该研究的目标是在 2022 年 12 月之前,将 GAU 入院或转院后 1 周内的复苏状态相关(RSR)护理目标讨论(GOCD)完成率提高 75%。我们实施了电子病历 RSO、更新了医院政策并提供了员工教育。一项为期 4 年的 GAU 回顾性病历审查评估了 RSR GOCD 的频率、完成时间、文档质量和差异。此外,环境扫描还确定了导致 RSR GOCD 的因素:在 431 份回顾性病历中,RSR GOCD 的平均完成率为 13.9%;耗时 39.5 天,除去极端异常值,平均完成时间为 15 天。分组分析显示,AD 患者的 RSR GOCD 完成率(41.6%)与非 AD 患者的 RSR GOCD 完成率(16.3%)相比存在显著差异。有 RSR GOCD 的病历中的不一致率很高:有记录但无相应的 RSO(66.7%),有 RSO 但无记录(26.1%),记录和 RSO 之间的复苏状态不一致(7.2%)。文件质量参差不齐:32.9% 的文件缺乏背景资料,20.7% 的文件只有有限的背景资料,而 46.3% 的文件提供了全面的背景资料。RSR GOCD 的障碍包括缺乏 EHR 文档工具和明确的触发器:结论:RSR GOCD 的完成率低于预期,耗时也比预期长,这凸显了改进的机会。AD 分组分析表明,医疗服务提供者意识到了 RSR GOCD 在这一人群中的重要性。差异和文件质量问题对以患者为中心的护理构成了风险。利益相关者必须通力合作,开发基于系统的信息学解决方案,确保及时、全面和以患者为中心的 RSR GOCD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Increasing resuscitation status-related goals of care discussions for older adults with severe mental illness in a Canadian mental health setting: a retrospective study.

Background: Older adults with severe mental illness, including advanced dementia (AD), within geriatric admission units (GAU) often prioritise comfort care, avoiding life-prolonging procedures including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Pre-2019, hospital policy lacked a resuscitation status order (RSO) incorporating distinct do-not-resuscitate levels. Providers entered 'NO CPR' orders in the electronic health record (EHR), necessitating transfers for non-CPR medical issues, contradicting patient preferences.

Methods: The study aimed for a 75% increase in resuscitation status-related (RSR) goals of care discussion (GOCD) completion rates within 1 week of GAU admission or transfer by December 2022. We implemented an EHR RSO, updated hospital policy and provided staff education. A 4-year GAU retrospective chart review assessed RSR GOCD frequency, completion time, documentation quality and discrepancies. Additionally, an environmental scan identified contributing factors to RSR GOCD.

Results: Among 431 reviewed charts, the mean RSR GOCD completion rate was 13.9%; taking 39.5 days, with extreme outliers removed, the mean of time to completion was 15 days. Subgroup analysis highlighted a significant difference in RSR GOCD completion rates for AD (41.6%) compared with non-AD patients (16.3%). Discrepancy rates in charts with RSR GOCD were substantial: documentation without a corresponding RSO (66.7%), RSO without documentation (26.1%) and discordant resuscitation status between documentation and RSO (7.2%). Documentation quality varied: 32.9% lacked context, 20.7% had limited context, while 46.3% provided comprehensive context. Barriers to RSR GOCD included the absence of an EHR documentation tool and clear triggers.

Conclusion: RSR GOCD completion rates were lower and took longer than anticipated, highlighting improvement opportunities. AD subgroup analysis indicated provider awareness of RSR GOCD importance in this population. Discrepancies and documentation quality issues pose risks to patient-centred care. Collaborative stakeholder efforts are imperative for developing system-based informatics solutions, ensuring timely, comprehensive and patient-centred RSR GOCD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信