对接受高通量间歇性血液透析的成人静脉注射万古霉素群体药代动力学模型进行外部评估。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Cheng Ji, Jonathan Garcia, Argem Joy Sabuga, Maurane Ricard, France Dion, Vlad Alexandru Rosu, Marie-Ève Legris, Amélie Marsot, Van Dong Nguyen
{"title":"对接受高通量间歇性血液透析的成人静脉注射万古霉素群体药代动力学模型进行外部评估。","authors":"Cheng Ji,&nbsp;Jonathan Garcia,&nbsp;Argem Joy Sabuga,&nbsp;Maurane Ricard,&nbsp;France Dion,&nbsp;Vlad Alexandru Rosu,&nbsp;Marie-Ève Legris,&nbsp;Amélie Marsot,&nbsp;Van Dong Nguyen","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Patients undergoing haemodialysis (HD) are at greater risk of methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> infections requiring intravenous vancomycin. Close vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring is warranted in HD patients as renal clearance is the primary elimination pathway. Clinically, population pharmacokinetics (popPK) model-informed dosing is commonly used. This study aimed to perform an external evaluation of published vancomycin popPK models developed for adults undergoing high-flux intermittent HD, and to create a dosing nomogram derived from the model that performed best.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A literature review was conducted through PubMed and EMBASE to identify relevant popPK models. an external dataset was collected retrospectively from patients of 2 healthcare centres in Quebec, Canada. Selected models were implemented in <i>NONMEM</i> (v7.5; ICON Development Solutions). Predictive performance was assessed through prediction and simulation-based diagnostics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 2386 vancomycin concentrations were collected from 274 patients and 476 antibiotic courses. Four vancomycin popPK models were selected for evaluation. None of the models demonstrated overall satisfactory or clinically acceptable predictive performance. Nonetheless, Bae et al.’s model performed best with a median prediction error of 16.25% and median absolute prediction error of 34.66%. Different predictive performance was also observed for vancomycin concentrations from samples collected during and between HD sessions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>All evaluated models presented poor overall predictive performance. Further studies are required, through existing popPK model parameter re-estimation or new model development, to adequately describe vancomycin pharmacokinetics for our high-flux intermittent HD patient cohort.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":"91 3","pages":"856-865"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcp.16334","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External evaluation of intravenous vancomycin population pharmacokinetic models in adults receiving high-flux intermittent haemodialysis\",\"authors\":\"Cheng Ji,&nbsp;Jonathan Garcia,&nbsp;Argem Joy Sabuga,&nbsp;Maurane Ricard,&nbsp;France Dion,&nbsp;Vlad Alexandru Rosu,&nbsp;Marie-Ève Legris,&nbsp;Amélie Marsot,&nbsp;Van Dong Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bcp.16334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients undergoing haemodialysis (HD) are at greater risk of methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> infections requiring intravenous vancomycin. Close vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring is warranted in HD patients as renal clearance is the primary elimination pathway. Clinically, population pharmacokinetics (popPK) model-informed dosing is commonly used. This study aimed to perform an external evaluation of published vancomycin popPK models developed for adults undergoing high-flux intermittent HD, and to create a dosing nomogram derived from the model that performed best.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A literature review was conducted through PubMed and EMBASE to identify relevant popPK models. an external dataset was collected retrospectively from patients of 2 healthcare centres in Quebec, Canada. Selected models were implemented in <i>NONMEM</i> (v7.5; ICON Development Solutions). Predictive performance was assessed through prediction and simulation-based diagnostics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In total, 2386 vancomycin concentrations were collected from 274 patients and 476 antibiotic courses. Four vancomycin popPK models were selected for evaluation. None of the models demonstrated overall satisfactory or clinically acceptable predictive performance. Nonetheless, Bae et al.’s model performed best with a median prediction error of 16.25% and median absolute prediction error of 34.66%. Different predictive performance was also observed for vancomycin concentrations from samples collected during and between HD sessions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>All evaluated models presented poor overall predictive performance. Further studies are required, through existing popPK model parameter re-estimation or new model development, to adequately describe vancomycin pharmacokinetics for our high-flux intermittent HD patient cohort.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"91 3\",\"pages\":\"856-865\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcp.16334\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.16334\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.16334","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:接受血液透析(HD)的患者发生耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的风险更大,需要静脉注射万古霉素。由于肾脏清除是消除万古霉素的主要途径,因此需要对血液透析患者进行密切的万古霉素治疗药物监测。临床上通常使用群体药代动力学(popPK)模型指导用药。本研究旨在对已发表的万古霉素流行药代动力学模型进行外部评估,这些模型是为接受高通量间歇性 HD 治疗的成人开发的,并根据表现最佳的模型创建了一个剂量提名图:通过 PubMed 和 EMBASE 进行文献综述,以确定相关 popPK 模型。选定的模型在 NONMEM(v7.5;ICON Development Solutions)中实施。通过预测和模拟诊断评估了预测性能:总共从 274 名患者和 476 个抗生素疗程中收集到 2386 个万古霉素浓度。我们选择了四个万古霉素 popPK 模型进行评估。这些模型均未显示出令人满意或临床可接受的整体预测性能。不过,Bae 等人的模型表现最好,预测误差中位数为 16.25%,绝对预测误差中位数为 34.66%。对于在血液透析过程中和两次透析之间采集的样本中的万古霉素浓度,也观察到了不同的预测性能:结论:所有评估模型的总体预测性能都较差。结论:所有评估模型的总体预测性能较差,需要通过现有 popPK 模型参数的重新估计或新模型的开发进行进一步研究,以充分描述高流量间歇性 HD 患者队列的万古霉素药代动力学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

External evaluation of intravenous vancomycin population pharmacokinetic models in adults receiving high-flux intermittent haemodialysis

External evaluation of intravenous vancomycin population pharmacokinetic models in adults receiving high-flux intermittent haemodialysis

Aims

Patients undergoing haemodialysis (HD) are at greater risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections requiring intravenous vancomycin. Close vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring is warranted in HD patients as renal clearance is the primary elimination pathway. Clinically, population pharmacokinetics (popPK) model-informed dosing is commonly used. This study aimed to perform an external evaluation of published vancomycin popPK models developed for adults undergoing high-flux intermittent HD, and to create a dosing nomogram derived from the model that performed best.

Methods

A literature review was conducted through PubMed and EMBASE to identify relevant popPK models. an external dataset was collected retrospectively from patients of 2 healthcare centres in Quebec, Canada. Selected models were implemented in NONMEM (v7.5; ICON Development Solutions). Predictive performance was assessed through prediction and simulation-based diagnostics.

Results

In total, 2386 vancomycin concentrations were collected from 274 patients and 476 antibiotic courses. Four vancomycin popPK models were selected for evaluation. None of the models demonstrated overall satisfactory or clinically acceptable predictive performance. Nonetheless, Bae et al.’s model performed best with a median prediction error of 16.25% and median absolute prediction error of 34.66%. Different predictive performance was also observed for vancomycin concentrations from samples collected during and between HD sessions.

Conclusion

All evaluated models presented poor overall predictive performance. Further studies are required, through existing popPK model parameter re-estimation or new model development, to adequately describe vancomycin pharmacokinetics for our high-flux intermittent HD patient cohort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信