以青少年为重点的自杀预防 HOPE 善后服务评估:非随机混合效果-实施类型 I 设计方案。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Dzenana Kartal, Tess Jaeger, Michelle Lamblin, Hannah Richards, Katrina Witt, Jo-An Occhipinti, Cathrine Mihalopoulos, Mary Lou Chatterton, Andrew Chanen, Patrick McGorry, Adam Skinner, Isabel Zbukvic, Andrew Thompson, Jonathan Knott, Anna Flego, Craig Hamilton, Marianne Webb, Edward Mullen, Natasha Swingler, Bridget Kenny, Jo Robinson
{"title":"以青少年为重点的自杀预防 HOPE 善后服务评估:非随机混合效果-实施类型 I 设计方案。","authors":"Dzenana Kartal, Tess Jaeger, Michelle Lamblin, Hannah Richards, Katrina Witt, Jo-An Occhipinti, Cathrine Mihalopoulos, Mary Lou Chatterton, Andrew Chanen, Patrick McGorry, Adam Skinner, Isabel Zbukvic, Andrew Thompson, Jonathan Knott, Anna Flego, Craig Hamilton, Marianne Webb, Edward Mullen, Natasha Swingler, Bridget Kenny, Jo Robinson","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11795-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suicide is the fourth leading cause of death among young people aged 15-29 worldwide. Young people often present to emergency departments (EDs) with self-harm and suicide-related behaviors. The period following discharge from the ED is recognized as one of elevated risk for both repeated self-harm and suicide. During this critical time, suicide prevention aftercare services are recommended. Despite their increased popularity, evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of these models is very limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type I design, this evaluation will assess the effectiveness and implementation of a suicide prevention aftercare (Hospital Outreach Post-suicidal Engagement; HOPE) service designed to reduce risk of self-harm and suicide in young people aged 12-25 who are referred to the service following an ED presentation for self-harm or suicide attempt. Two complementing theoretical frameworks will guide this evaluation, specifically the design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation of results. The RE-AIM evaluation framework will be used to assess Reach, Effectiveness (including cost-effectiveness), Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance of the HOPE aftercare service. The PRISM implementation framework will be used to assess multi-level contextual factors hypothesized to affect the RE-AIM outcomes. Several data sources will be used to assess the changes in primary and secondary outcomes from baseline to post-intervention, and at follow-up, including user and provider self-report surveys, semi-structured interviews, and routinely collected hospital data. An historical control study will also be conducted using data from the Self-Harm Monitoring System for Victoria to examine the impact of the service on rates of self-harm and suicide-related presentations to ED, and compare trends prior to and following commencement of the HOPE aftercare service. In addition, dynamic systems modelling will be used to assess the future scalability of the service.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings from this evaluation will determine the effectiveness, including cost-effectiveness, of the HOPE aftercare service and describe the implementation context. They will inform the future development and sustainability of this and other similar services across Australia and internationally.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on the 19th December 2023 (Registration number ACTRN12623001332617). We do not foresee any amendments to this protocol however, if any unforeseen modifications are required, they will be submitted to ANZCTR.</p><p><strong>Trial sponsor: </strong>Orygen, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"1395"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a youth-focused suicide prevention HOPE aftercare service: protocol for a non-randomized hybrid effectiveness-implementation type I design.\",\"authors\":\"Dzenana Kartal, Tess Jaeger, Michelle Lamblin, Hannah Richards, Katrina Witt, Jo-An Occhipinti, Cathrine Mihalopoulos, Mary Lou Chatterton, Andrew Chanen, Patrick McGorry, Adam Skinner, Isabel Zbukvic, Andrew Thompson, Jonathan Knott, Anna Flego, Craig Hamilton, Marianne Webb, Edward Mullen, Natasha Swingler, Bridget Kenny, Jo Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-024-11795-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suicide is the fourth leading cause of death among young people aged 15-29 worldwide. Young people often present to emergency departments (EDs) with self-harm and suicide-related behaviors. The period following discharge from the ED is recognized as one of elevated risk for both repeated self-harm and suicide. During this critical time, suicide prevention aftercare services are recommended. Despite their increased popularity, evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of these models is very limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type I design, this evaluation will assess the effectiveness and implementation of a suicide prevention aftercare (Hospital Outreach Post-suicidal Engagement; HOPE) service designed to reduce risk of self-harm and suicide in young people aged 12-25 who are referred to the service following an ED presentation for self-harm or suicide attempt. Two complementing theoretical frameworks will guide this evaluation, specifically the design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation of results. The RE-AIM evaluation framework will be used to assess Reach, Effectiveness (including cost-effectiveness), Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance of the HOPE aftercare service. The PRISM implementation framework will be used to assess multi-level contextual factors hypothesized to affect the RE-AIM outcomes. Several data sources will be used to assess the changes in primary and secondary outcomes from baseline to post-intervention, and at follow-up, including user and provider self-report surveys, semi-structured interviews, and routinely collected hospital data. An historical control study will also be conducted using data from the Self-Harm Monitoring System for Victoria to examine the impact of the service on rates of self-harm and suicide-related presentations to ED, and compare trends prior to and following commencement of the HOPE aftercare service. In addition, dynamic systems modelling will be used to assess the future scalability of the service.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings from this evaluation will determine the effectiveness, including cost-effectiveness, of the HOPE aftercare service and describe the implementation context. They will inform the future development and sustainability of this and other similar services across Australia and internationally.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on the 19th December 2023 (Registration number ACTRN12623001332617). We do not foresee any amendments to this protocol however, if any unforeseen modifications are required, they will be submitted to ANZCTR.</p><p><strong>Trial sponsor: </strong>Orygen, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"1395\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559173/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11795-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11795-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自杀是全球 15-29 岁年轻人的第四大死因。急诊科(ED)经常接诊有自我伤害和自杀相关行为的年轻人。从急诊室出院后的一段时间被认为是重复自残和自杀的高危期。在这一关键时期,建议提供自杀预防后续护理服务。尽管这些模式越来越受欢迎,但证明其有效性的证据却非常有限:本评估将采用有效性与实施性混合的 I 型设计,评估自杀预防后护理服务(Hospital Outreach Post-suicidal Engagement; HOPE)的有效性和实施情况,该服务旨在降低因自残或自杀未遂而在急诊室就诊后被转介到该服务的 12-25 岁青少年的自残和自杀风险。两个互补的理论框架将指导本次评估,特别是设计、数据收集、分析和结果解释。RE-AIM 评估框架将用于评估 HOPE 善后护理服务的覆盖面、有效性(包括成本效益)、采用、实施和维护。PRISM 实施框架将用于评估假定会影响 RE-AIM 结果的多层次背景因素。将使用多种数据来源来评估从基线到干预后以及随访期间主要和次要结果的变化,包括使用者和提供者的自我报告调查、半结构化访谈以及医院常规收集的数据。还将利用维多利亚州自残监测系统的数据开展一项历史对照研究,以检查该服务对自残率和与自杀相关的急诊室就诊率的影响,并比较 HOPE 善后护理服务开始之前和之后的趋势。此外,还将使用动态系统模型来评估该服务未来的可扩展性:本次评估的结果将确定 HOPE 善后护理服务的有效性(包括成本效益),并描述其实施背景。这些结果将为该服务以及澳大利亚和国际上其他类似服务的未来发展和可持续性提供参考:本试验已于 2023 年 12 月 19 日在澳大利亚-新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR)进行了前瞻性注册(注册号为 ACTRN12623001332617)。我们预计不会对该方案进行任何修改,但如果需要进行任何不可预见的修改,则会提交给 ANZCTR:Orygen, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of a youth-focused suicide prevention HOPE aftercare service: protocol for a non-randomized hybrid effectiveness-implementation type I design.

Background: Suicide is the fourth leading cause of death among young people aged 15-29 worldwide. Young people often present to emergency departments (EDs) with self-harm and suicide-related behaviors. The period following discharge from the ED is recognized as one of elevated risk for both repeated self-harm and suicide. During this critical time, suicide prevention aftercare services are recommended. Despite their increased popularity, evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of these models is very limited.

Methods: Using a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type I design, this evaluation will assess the effectiveness and implementation of a suicide prevention aftercare (Hospital Outreach Post-suicidal Engagement; HOPE) service designed to reduce risk of self-harm and suicide in young people aged 12-25 who are referred to the service following an ED presentation for self-harm or suicide attempt. Two complementing theoretical frameworks will guide this evaluation, specifically the design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation of results. The RE-AIM evaluation framework will be used to assess Reach, Effectiveness (including cost-effectiveness), Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance of the HOPE aftercare service. The PRISM implementation framework will be used to assess multi-level contextual factors hypothesized to affect the RE-AIM outcomes. Several data sources will be used to assess the changes in primary and secondary outcomes from baseline to post-intervention, and at follow-up, including user and provider self-report surveys, semi-structured interviews, and routinely collected hospital data. An historical control study will also be conducted using data from the Self-Harm Monitoring System for Victoria to examine the impact of the service on rates of self-harm and suicide-related presentations to ED, and compare trends prior to and following commencement of the HOPE aftercare service. In addition, dynamic systems modelling will be used to assess the future scalability of the service.

Discussion: Findings from this evaluation will determine the effectiveness, including cost-effectiveness, of the HOPE aftercare service and describe the implementation context. They will inform the future development and sustainability of this and other similar services across Australia and internationally.

Trial registration: This trial was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on the 19th December 2023 (Registration number ACTRN12623001332617). We do not foresee any amendments to this protocol however, if any unforeseen modifications are required, they will be submitted to ANZCTR.

Trial sponsor: Orygen, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信