买不到爱?驻地申请过程中的礼物使用。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Brigitte Anderson, Nicole Ducich, Brady Campbell, Matthew Cahn, Stephen M Kavic
{"title":"买不到爱?驻地申请过程中的礼物使用。","authors":"Brigitte Anderson, Nicole Ducich, Brady Campbell, Matthew Cahn, Stephen M Kavic","doi":"10.1177/00031348241300357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To set themselves apart, some programs use gifts or promotional items to highlight the residency program or unique local culture. The distinction between advertisement and persuasion may be blurry in this case. We sought to quantify the prevalence of gifts to applicants and how frequently the US federal threshold for \"nominal gifts\" was exceeded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed a publicly accessible, Internet resource called the \"ERAS Megathread.\" This is a Google spreadsheet found on Reddit where applicants participating in The Match can anonymously contribute information about their experience. The incidence of \"gifts\" was quantified for surgical residency programs, along with the nominal value if indicated. The spreadsheets were reviewed for 2021, 2022, and 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the past 3 application cycles, 15.1% [11.1%-18.2%] of general surgery residency programs provided a gift to applicants. Of these programs, the majority (70.2%) are university-based programs. In 2023, 57.9% of these gifts exceeded US$20. Given the anonymous nature of the data set, and the lack of transparency in the match process, it was not possible to correlate gift giving with its effect on recruitment.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>Students are courted by residency programs, and a significant minority of programs provide a gift to applicants. The impact of a substantial gift on a financially vulnerable student is difficult to quantify. It behooves us as a specialty to determine what should be a universal standard and to consider outlining explicit guidelines for The Match.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can't Buy Me Love? The Use of Gifts in the Residency Application Process.\",\"authors\":\"Brigitte Anderson, Nicole Ducich, Brady Campbell, Matthew Cahn, Stephen M Kavic\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00031348241300357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To set themselves apart, some programs use gifts or promotional items to highlight the residency program or unique local culture. The distinction between advertisement and persuasion may be blurry in this case. We sought to quantify the prevalence of gifts to applicants and how frequently the US federal threshold for \\\"nominal gifts\\\" was exceeded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed a publicly accessible, Internet resource called the \\\"ERAS Megathread.\\\" This is a Google spreadsheet found on Reddit where applicants participating in The Match can anonymously contribute information about their experience. The incidence of \\\"gifts\\\" was quantified for surgical residency programs, along with the nominal value if indicated. The spreadsheets were reviewed for 2021, 2022, and 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the past 3 application cycles, 15.1% [11.1%-18.2%] of general surgery residency programs provided a gift to applicants. Of these programs, the majority (70.2%) are university-based programs. In 2023, 57.9% of these gifts exceeded US$20. Given the anonymous nature of the data set, and the lack of transparency in the match process, it was not possible to correlate gift giving with its effect on recruitment.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>Students are courted by residency programs, and a significant minority of programs provide a gift to applicants. The impact of a substantial gift on a financially vulnerable student is difficult to quantify. It behooves us as a specialty to determine what should be a universal standard and to consider outlining explicit guidelines for The Match.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Surgeon\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Surgeon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241300357\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241300357","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:为了使自己与众不同,一些项目会使用礼品或促销品来突出住院实习项目或独特的当地文化。在这种情况下,广告和劝说之间的区别可能很模糊。我们试图量化向申请人赠送礼物的普遍程度,以及超过美国联邦政府规定的 "名义礼物 "门槛的频率:我们查阅了一个名为 "ERAS Megathread "的公开互联网资源。这是一个在 Reddit 上找到的谷歌电子表格,参加 The Match 的申请人可以匿名提供有关他们经历的信息。我们对外科住院医师培训项目的 "礼物 "发生率进行了量化,并标明了名义价值。对 2021 年、2022 年和 2023 年的电子表格进行了审查:在过去的三个申请周期中,15.1% [11.1%-18.2%] 的普外科住院医师培训项目向申请人提供了礼物。在这些项目中,大多数(70.2%)是大学项目。2023 年,57.9% 的礼物超过了 20 美元。鉴于数据集的匿名性,以及匹配过程缺乏透明度,因此无法将礼品赠送与其对招聘的影响联系起来:住院医师培训项目都会向学生抛出橄榄枝,其中有相当一部分项目会向申请人赠送礼品。大量礼物对经济困难学生的影响很难量化。作为一个专业,我们有必要确定什么是通用标准,并考虑为 The Match 制定明确的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can't Buy Me Love? The Use of Gifts in the Residency Application Process.

Introduction: To set themselves apart, some programs use gifts or promotional items to highlight the residency program or unique local culture. The distinction between advertisement and persuasion may be blurry in this case. We sought to quantify the prevalence of gifts to applicants and how frequently the US federal threshold for "nominal gifts" was exceeded.

Methods: We reviewed a publicly accessible, Internet resource called the "ERAS Megathread." This is a Google spreadsheet found on Reddit where applicants participating in The Match can anonymously contribute information about their experience. The incidence of "gifts" was quantified for surgical residency programs, along with the nominal value if indicated. The spreadsheets were reviewed for 2021, 2022, and 2023.

Results: Over the past 3 application cycles, 15.1% [11.1%-18.2%] of general surgery residency programs provided a gift to applicants. Of these programs, the majority (70.2%) are university-based programs. In 2023, 57.9% of these gifts exceeded US$20. Given the anonymous nature of the data set, and the lack of transparency in the match process, it was not possible to correlate gift giving with its effect on recruitment.

Discussion/conclusion: Students are courted by residency programs, and a significant minority of programs provide a gift to applicants. The impact of a substantial gift on a financially vulnerable student is difficult to quantify. It behooves us as a specialty to determine what should be a universal standard and to consider outlining explicit guidelines for The Match.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信