症状筛查与儿科癌症患者的护理路径有关

JAMA Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1001/jama.2024.19585
L. Lee Dupuis, Emily Vettese, Allison C. Grimes, Melissa P. Beauchemin, Lisa M. Klesges, Christina Baggott, Jenna Demedis, Catherine Aftandilian, David R. Freyer, Nicole Crellin-Parsons, Etan Orgel, David Dickens, Kara M. Kelly, Wade Kyono, Alexandra Walsh, Farha Sherani, Daniel Cannone, Andrea D. Orsey, Allison A. King, Lolie Yu, Wendy Woods-Swafford, Scott M. Bradfield, Michael E. Roth, Adam J. Esbenshade, Emi H. Caywood, Vibhuti Agarwal, Ramamoorthy Nagasubramanian, George A. Tomlinson, Lillian Sung
{"title":"症状筛查与儿科癌症患者的护理路径有关","authors":"L. Lee Dupuis, Emily Vettese, Allison C. Grimes, Melissa P. Beauchemin, Lisa M. Klesges, Christina Baggott, Jenna Demedis, Catherine Aftandilian, David R. Freyer, Nicole Crellin-Parsons, Etan Orgel, David Dickens, Kara M. Kelly, Wade Kyono, Alexandra Walsh, Farha Sherani, Daniel Cannone, Andrea D. Orsey, Allison A. King, Lolie Yu, Wendy Woods-Swafford, Scott M. Bradfield, Michael E. Roth, Adam J. Esbenshade, Emi H. Caywood, Vibhuti Agarwal, Ramamoorthy Nagasubramanian, George A. Tomlinson, Lillian Sung","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.19585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportancePediatric patients with cancer commonly experience severely bothersome symptoms. The effectiveness of routine symptom screening with symptom feedback and symptom management care pathways is unknown.ObjectiveTo determine whether thrice-weekly symptom screening with symptom feedback and management care pathways, compared with usual care, improves overall self-reported symptom scores measured by the Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) in pediatric patients with cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cluster randomized trial enrolled participants between July 2021 and August 2023 from 20 pediatric cancer centers in the US. Patients newly diagnosed with cancer aged 8 to 18 years receiving any cancer treatment were included. Twenty sites were randomized to provide symptom screening (n = 10) vs usual care (n = 10); 221 participants were enrolled at intervention sites and 224 participants at control sites. The date of final follow-up was October 18, 2023.InterventionSymptom screening included providing thrice-weekly symptom screening prompts to participants, email alerts to the health care team, and locally adapted symptom management care pathway implementation.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was self-reported total SSPedi score at week 8 (range, 0-60; higher scores indicate more bothersome). Secondary outcomes were Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Fatigue score (mean [SD] score, 50 [10]; higher scores indicate more fatigue), Pediatric Quality of Life 3.0 Acute Cancer Module scores (range, 0-100; higher scores indicate better health), symptom documentation and interventions at week 8, and unplanned health care encounters.ResultsA total of 445 participants (median [range] age, 14.8 [8.1-18.9] years; 58.9% males) were enrolled. The mean (SD) 8-week SSPedi score was 7.9 (7.2) in the symptom screening group vs 11.4 (8.7) in the usual care group. Symptom screening was associated with significantly better 8-week total SSPedi scores (adjusted mean difference, −3.8 [95% CI, −6.4 to −1.2]) and less bothersome individual symptoms, with 12 of 15 symptoms being statistically significantly reduced. There was no difference in fatigue or quality of life. The mean (SD) number of emergency department visits was 0.77 (1.12) in the symptom screening group and 0.45 (0.81) in the usual care group. There were significantly more emergency department visits in the symptom screening group (rate ratio, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.03-2.87]).ConclusionsSymptom screening with symptom feedback and symptom management care pathways was associated with improved symptom scores and increased symptom-specific interventions. Future work should integrate symptom screening into routine clinical care.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04614662\">NCT04614662</jats:ext-link>","PeriodicalId":518009,"journal":{"name":"JAMA","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Symptom Screening Linked to Care Pathways for Pediatric Patients With Cancer\",\"authors\":\"L. Lee Dupuis, Emily Vettese, Allison C. Grimes, Melissa P. Beauchemin, Lisa M. Klesges, Christina Baggott, Jenna Demedis, Catherine Aftandilian, David R. Freyer, Nicole Crellin-Parsons, Etan Orgel, David Dickens, Kara M. Kelly, Wade Kyono, Alexandra Walsh, Farha Sherani, Daniel Cannone, Andrea D. Orsey, Allison A. King, Lolie Yu, Wendy Woods-Swafford, Scott M. Bradfield, Michael E. Roth, Adam J. Esbenshade, Emi H. Caywood, Vibhuti Agarwal, Ramamoorthy Nagasubramanian, George A. Tomlinson, Lillian Sung\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jama.2024.19585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ImportancePediatric patients with cancer commonly experience severely bothersome symptoms. The effectiveness of routine symptom screening with symptom feedback and symptom management care pathways is unknown.ObjectiveTo determine whether thrice-weekly symptom screening with symptom feedback and management care pathways, compared with usual care, improves overall self-reported symptom scores measured by the Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) in pediatric patients with cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cluster randomized trial enrolled participants between July 2021 and August 2023 from 20 pediatric cancer centers in the US. Patients newly diagnosed with cancer aged 8 to 18 years receiving any cancer treatment were included. Twenty sites were randomized to provide symptom screening (n = 10) vs usual care (n = 10); 221 participants were enrolled at intervention sites and 224 participants at control sites. The date of final follow-up was October 18, 2023.InterventionSymptom screening included providing thrice-weekly symptom screening prompts to participants, email alerts to the health care team, and locally adapted symptom management care pathway implementation.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was self-reported total SSPedi score at week 8 (range, 0-60; higher scores indicate more bothersome). Secondary outcomes were Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Fatigue score (mean [SD] score, 50 [10]; higher scores indicate more fatigue), Pediatric Quality of Life 3.0 Acute Cancer Module scores (range, 0-100; higher scores indicate better health), symptom documentation and interventions at week 8, and unplanned health care encounters.ResultsA total of 445 participants (median [range] age, 14.8 [8.1-18.9] years; 58.9% males) were enrolled. The mean (SD) 8-week SSPedi score was 7.9 (7.2) in the symptom screening group vs 11.4 (8.7) in the usual care group. Symptom screening was associated with significantly better 8-week total SSPedi scores (adjusted mean difference, −3.8 [95% CI, −6.4 to −1.2]) and less bothersome individual symptoms, with 12 of 15 symptoms being statistically significantly reduced. There was no difference in fatigue or quality of life. The mean (SD) number of emergency department visits was 0.77 (1.12) in the symptom screening group and 0.45 (0.81) in the usual care group. There were significantly more emergency department visits in the symptom screening group (rate ratio, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.03-2.87]).ConclusionsSymptom screening with symptom feedback and symptom management care pathways was associated with improved symptom scores and increased symptom-specific interventions. Future work should integrate symptom screening into routine clinical care.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\\\" ext-link-type=\\\"uri\\\" xlink:href=\\\"https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04614662\\\">NCT04614662</jats:ext-link>\",\"PeriodicalId\":518009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.19585\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.19585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性儿童癌症患者通常会出现严重的症状。目标与常规护理相比,确定每周三次的症状筛查、症状反馈和症状管理护理路径是否能改善儿科癌症患者通过儿科症状筛查工具(SSPedi)测量的总体自我报告症状评分。设计、设置和参与者这项群组随机试验在 2021 年 7 月至 2023 年 8 月期间从美国 20 家儿科癌症中心招募参与者。新确诊的癌症患者年龄在 8 到 18 岁之间,接受过任何癌症治疗。20个试验点被随机分配为提供症状筛查(10人)与常规护理(10人);干预试验点有221名参与者,对照试验点有224名参与者。干预措施症状筛查包括每周三次向参与者提供症状筛查提示、向医疗团队发送电子邮件提醒,以及实施适合当地情况的症状管理护理路径。主要结果和测量指标主要结果是第8周时自我报告的SSPedi总分(范围为0-60分;分数越高表示越困扰)。次要结果为患者报告结果测量信息系统疲劳评分(平均[标度]为50[10]分;分数越高表示越疲劳)、儿科生活质量3.0急性癌症模块评分(范围为0-100分;分数越高表示健康状况越好)、第8周的症状记录和干预措施以及计划外医疗就诊情况。 结果共有445名参与者(年龄中位数[范围]为14.8[8.1-18.9]岁;58.9%为男性)参加了研究。症状筛查组的 8 周 SSPedi 平均得分(标清)为 7.9 (7.2),而常规护理组为 11.4 (8.7)。症状筛查组患者的 8 周 SSPedi 总分明显提高(调整后的平均差异为-3.8 [95% CI, -6.4 to -1.2] ),个别症状也有所减轻,15 种症状中有 12 种在统计学上明显减轻。在疲劳或生活质量方面没有差异。症状筛查组的平均(标清)急诊就诊次数为 0.77(1.12)次,常规护理组为 0.45(0.81)次。症状筛查组的急诊就诊人数明显多于常规护理组(比率比为 1.72 [95% CI, 1.03-2.87])。今后的工作应将症状筛查纳入常规临床护理中:NCT04614662
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Symptom Screening Linked to Care Pathways for Pediatric Patients With Cancer
ImportancePediatric patients with cancer commonly experience severely bothersome symptoms. The effectiveness of routine symptom screening with symptom feedback and symptom management care pathways is unknown.ObjectiveTo determine whether thrice-weekly symptom screening with symptom feedback and management care pathways, compared with usual care, improves overall self-reported symptom scores measured by the Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) in pediatric patients with cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cluster randomized trial enrolled participants between July 2021 and August 2023 from 20 pediatric cancer centers in the US. Patients newly diagnosed with cancer aged 8 to 18 years receiving any cancer treatment were included. Twenty sites were randomized to provide symptom screening (n = 10) vs usual care (n = 10); 221 participants were enrolled at intervention sites and 224 participants at control sites. The date of final follow-up was October 18, 2023.InterventionSymptom screening included providing thrice-weekly symptom screening prompts to participants, email alerts to the health care team, and locally adapted symptom management care pathway implementation.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was self-reported total SSPedi score at week 8 (range, 0-60; higher scores indicate more bothersome). Secondary outcomes were Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Fatigue score (mean [SD] score, 50 [10]; higher scores indicate more fatigue), Pediatric Quality of Life 3.0 Acute Cancer Module scores (range, 0-100; higher scores indicate better health), symptom documentation and interventions at week 8, and unplanned health care encounters.ResultsA total of 445 participants (median [range] age, 14.8 [8.1-18.9] years; 58.9% males) were enrolled. The mean (SD) 8-week SSPedi score was 7.9 (7.2) in the symptom screening group vs 11.4 (8.7) in the usual care group. Symptom screening was associated with significantly better 8-week total SSPedi scores (adjusted mean difference, −3.8 [95% CI, −6.4 to −1.2]) and less bothersome individual symptoms, with 12 of 15 symptoms being statistically significantly reduced. There was no difference in fatigue or quality of life. The mean (SD) number of emergency department visits was 0.77 (1.12) in the symptom screening group and 0.45 (0.81) in the usual care group. There were significantly more emergency department visits in the symptom screening group (rate ratio, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.03-2.87]).ConclusionsSymptom screening with symptom feedback and symptom management care pathways was associated with improved symptom scores and increased symptom-specific interventions. Future work should integrate symptom screening into routine clinical care.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04614662
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信