用于医学分析的多模态表征学习--系统性文献综述。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Emil Riis Hansen, Tomer Sagi, Katja Hose
{"title":"用于医学分析的多模态表征学习--系统性文献综述。","authors":"Emil Riis Hansen, Tomer Sagi, Katja Hose","doi":"10.1177/14604582241290474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Machine learning-based analytics over uni-modal medical data has shown considerable promise and is now routinely deployed in diagnostic procedures. However, patient data consists of diverse types of data. By exploiting such data, multimodal approaches promise to revolutionize our ability to provide personalized care. Attempts to combine two modalities in a single diagnostic task have utilized the evolving field of multimodal representation learning (MRL), which learns a shared latent space between related modality samples. This new space can be used to improve the performance of machine-learning-based analytics. So far, however, our understanding of how modalities have been applied in MRL-based medical applications and which modalities are best suited for specific medical tasks is still unclear, as previous reviews have not addressed the medical analytics domain and its unique challenges and opportunities. Instead, this work aims to review the landscape of MRL for medical tasks to highlight opportunities for advancing medical applications. <b>Methods:</b> This paper presents a framework for positioning MRL techniques and medical modalities. More than 1000 papers related to medical analytics were reviewed, positioned, and classified using the proposed framework in the most extensive review to date. The paper further provides an online tool for researchers and developers of medical analytics to dive into the rapidly changing landscape of MRL for medical applications. <b>Results:</b> The main finding is that work in the domain has been sparse: only a few medical informatics tasks have been the target of much MRL-based work, with the overwhelming majority of tasks being diagnostic rather than prognostic. Similarly, numerous potentially compatible information modality combinations are unexplored or under-explored for most medical tasks. <b>Conclusions:</b> There is much to gain from using MRL in many unexplored combinations of medical tasks and modalities. This work can guide researchers working on a specific medical application to identify under-explored modality combinations and identify novel and emerging MRL techniques that can be adapted to the task at hand.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"30 4","pages":"14604582241290474"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multimodal representation learning for medical analytics - a systematic literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Emil Riis Hansen, Tomer Sagi, Katja Hose\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14604582241290474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Machine learning-based analytics over uni-modal medical data has shown considerable promise and is now routinely deployed in diagnostic procedures. However, patient data consists of diverse types of data. By exploiting such data, multimodal approaches promise to revolutionize our ability to provide personalized care. Attempts to combine two modalities in a single diagnostic task have utilized the evolving field of multimodal representation learning (MRL), which learns a shared latent space between related modality samples. This new space can be used to improve the performance of machine-learning-based analytics. So far, however, our understanding of how modalities have been applied in MRL-based medical applications and which modalities are best suited for specific medical tasks is still unclear, as previous reviews have not addressed the medical analytics domain and its unique challenges and opportunities. Instead, this work aims to review the landscape of MRL for medical tasks to highlight opportunities for advancing medical applications. <b>Methods:</b> This paper presents a framework for positioning MRL techniques and medical modalities. More than 1000 papers related to medical analytics were reviewed, positioned, and classified using the proposed framework in the most extensive review to date. The paper further provides an online tool for researchers and developers of medical analytics to dive into the rapidly changing landscape of MRL for medical applications. <b>Results:</b> The main finding is that work in the domain has been sparse: only a few medical informatics tasks have been the target of much MRL-based work, with the overwhelming majority of tasks being diagnostic rather than prognostic. Similarly, numerous potentially compatible information modality combinations are unexplored or under-explored for most medical tasks. <b>Conclusions:</b> There is much to gain from using MRL in many unexplored combinations of medical tasks and modalities. This work can guide researchers working on a specific medical application to identify under-explored modality combinations and identify novel and emerging MRL techniques that can be adapted to the task at hand.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Informatics Journal\",\"volume\":\"30 4\",\"pages\":\"14604582241290474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Informatics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241290474\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241290474","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:基于机器学习的单模态医疗数据分析技术前景广阔,目前已被常规应用于诊断程序中。然而,患者数据由多种类型的数据组成。通过利用这些数据,多模态方法有望彻底改变我们提供个性化护理的能力。在单一诊断任务中结合两种模态的尝试利用了不断发展的多模态表征学习(MRL)领域,该领域学习相关模态样本之间的共享潜空间。这一新空间可用于提高基于机器学习的分析性能。然而,迄今为止,我们对基于 MRL 的医疗应用中如何应用模态以及哪些模态最适合特定医疗任务的理解仍不清楚,因为以前的综述没有涉及医疗分析领域及其独特的挑战和机遇。因此,本研究旨在回顾 MRL 在医疗任务中的应用情况,以突出推进医疗应用的机遇。方法:本文提出了一个用于定位 MRL 技术和医疗模式的框架。在迄今为止最广泛的综述中,使用所提出的框架对 1000 多篇与医疗分析相关的论文进行了综述、定位和分类。本文还为医疗分析的研究人员和开发人员提供了一个在线工具,帮助他们深入了解医疗应用中快速变化的 MRL 领域。结果:主要发现是,该领域的工作一直很稀少:只有少数医疗信息学任务是基于 MRL 的大量工作的目标,绝大多数任务是诊断性的,而不是预后性的。同样,在大多数医疗任务中,许多潜在的兼容信息模式组合尚未被探索或探索不足。结论:在许多尚未探索的医疗任务和模式组合中使用 MRL 有很多好处。这项工作可以指导从事特定医疗应用的研究人员确定未充分探索的模式组合,并确定可适应手头任务的新型和新兴 MRL 技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multimodal representation learning for medical analytics - a systematic literature review.

Objectives: Machine learning-based analytics over uni-modal medical data has shown considerable promise and is now routinely deployed in diagnostic procedures. However, patient data consists of diverse types of data. By exploiting such data, multimodal approaches promise to revolutionize our ability to provide personalized care. Attempts to combine two modalities in a single diagnostic task have utilized the evolving field of multimodal representation learning (MRL), which learns a shared latent space between related modality samples. This new space can be used to improve the performance of machine-learning-based analytics. So far, however, our understanding of how modalities have been applied in MRL-based medical applications and which modalities are best suited for specific medical tasks is still unclear, as previous reviews have not addressed the medical analytics domain and its unique challenges and opportunities. Instead, this work aims to review the landscape of MRL for medical tasks to highlight opportunities for advancing medical applications. Methods: This paper presents a framework for positioning MRL techniques and medical modalities. More than 1000 papers related to medical analytics were reviewed, positioned, and classified using the proposed framework in the most extensive review to date. The paper further provides an online tool for researchers and developers of medical analytics to dive into the rapidly changing landscape of MRL for medical applications. Results: The main finding is that work in the domain has been sparse: only a few medical informatics tasks have been the target of much MRL-based work, with the overwhelming majority of tasks being diagnostic rather than prognostic. Similarly, numerous potentially compatible information modality combinations are unexplored or under-explored for most medical tasks. Conclusions: There is much to gain from using MRL in many unexplored combinations of medical tasks and modalities. This work can guide researchers working on a specific medical application to identify under-explored modality combinations and identify novel and emerging MRL techniques that can be adapted to the task at hand.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信