急性右结肠炎和乙状结肠憩室炎的手术治疗和疗效比较:一项法国全国性回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
E Karam, C Sabbagh, L Beyer-Bergeot, P Zerbib, V Bridoux, G Manceau, Y Panis, E Buscail, A Venara, I Khaoudy, M Gaillard, M Viennet, A Thobie, B Menahem, C Eveno, C Bonnel, J-Y Mabrut, B Badic, C Godet, Y Eid, E Duchalais, Z Lakkis, E Cotte, A Laforest, V Desfourneaux, L Maggiori, L Rebibo, N Christou, A Talal, M Aubert, C Bonnamy, A Germain, F Mauvais, C Tresallet, J Roudie, A Laurent, B Trilling, M Bertrand, D Massalou, B Romain, H Tranchart, U Giger-Pabst, A Alves, M Ouaissi
{"title":"急性右结肠炎和乙状结肠憩室炎的手术治疗和疗效比较:一项法国全国性回顾性队列研究。","authors":"E Karam, C Sabbagh, L Beyer-Bergeot, P Zerbib, V Bridoux, G Manceau, Y Panis, E Buscail, A Venara, I Khaoudy, M Gaillard, M Viennet, A Thobie, B Menahem, C Eveno, C Bonnel, J-Y Mabrut, B Badic, C Godet, Y Eid, E Duchalais, Z Lakkis, E Cotte, A Laforest, V Desfourneaux, L Maggiori, L Rebibo, N Christou, A Talal, M Aubert, C Bonnamy, A Germain, F Mauvais, C Tresallet, J Roudie, A Laurent, B Trilling, M Bertrand, D Massalou, B Romain, H Tranchart, U Giger-Pabst, A Alves, M Ouaissi","doi":"10.1007/s10151-024-03024-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute right colic diverticulitis (ARD) is less frequent in Western countries than acute sigmoid diverticulitis (ASD). We aimed to compare the management of ARD and ASD operated on in emergency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients who had emergency surgery for ASD and ARD (2010-2021) were included in a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study. Patients were identified from databases in French centers that were members of the French Surgical Association. Emergency surgery was performed during the same hospitalization for peritonitis or after failure of conservative treatment. Early and late postoperative outcomes were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2297 patients were included with 2256 (98.2%) ASD and 41 (1.8%) ARD patients. Baseline characteristics were similar. Overall, patients were rated Hinchey 3-4 (63.9%, n = 1468, p = 0.287). ARD was more often treated with resection and anastomosis, protected or not (53.7%, n = 22), whereas ASD was mainly treated with resection and terminal ostomy (62.5% (n = 1409), p < 0.001). Median operative time was shorter for ARD (120 vs 146 min, p = 0.04). The group of ARD patients showed a higher prevalence of Clavien III/IV complications compared to the group of ASD patients, although no statistically significant difference was observed (41.5%, n = 17 vs. 27.6%, n = 620, p = 0.054). However 90-day mortality only happened in ASD patients (9.8%, n = 223 vs 0, p = 0.03). ARD patients had more diverticulitis recurrence (46.3%, n = 19 vs 13.4%, n = 303, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified female sex as a protective factor for recurrence [odds ratio (OR) 0.55, p < 0.001] and ARD as a risk factor (OR 8.85, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Operated on in emergency, ARDs have more resection anastomosis, with a similar rate of complications, less mortality, and more recurrence of diverticulitis than ASD.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"28 1","pages":"149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of surgical management and outcomes of acute right colic and sigmoid diverticulitis: a French national retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"E Karam, C Sabbagh, L Beyer-Bergeot, P Zerbib, V Bridoux, G Manceau, Y Panis, E Buscail, A Venara, I Khaoudy, M Gaillard, M Viennet, A Thobie, B Menahem, C Eveno, C Bonnel, J-Y Mabrut, B Badic, C Godet, Y Eid, E Duchalais, Z Lakkis, E Cotte, A Laforest, V Desfourneaux, L Maggiori, L Rebibo, N Christou, A Talal, M Aubert, C Bonnamy, A Germain, F Mauvais, C Tresallet, J Roudie, A Laurent, B Trilling, M Bertrand, D Massalou, B Romain, H Tranchart, U Giger-Pabst, A Alves, M Ouaissi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10151-024-03024-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute right colic diverticulitis (ARD) is less frequent in Western countries than acute sigmoid diverticulitis (ASD). We aimed to compare the management of ARD and ASD operated on in emergency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients who had emergency surgery for ASD and ARD (2010-2021) were included in a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study. Patients were identified from databases in French centers that were members of the French Surgical Association. Emergency surgery was performed during the same hospitalization for peritonitis or after failure of conservative treatment. Early and late postoperative outcomes were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2297 patients were included with 2256 (98.2%) ASD and 41 (1.8%) ARD patients. Baseline characteristics were similar. Overall, patients were rated Hinchey 3-4 (63.9%, n = 1468, p = 0.287). ARD was more often treated with resection and anastomosis, protected or not (53.7%, n = 22), whereas ASD was mainly treated with resection and terminal ostomy (62.5% (n = 1409), p < 0.001). Median operative time was shorter for ARD (120 vs 146 min, p = 0.04). The group of ARD patients showed a higher prevalence of Clavien III/IV complications compared to the group of ASD patients, although no statistically significant difference was observed (41.5%, n = 17 vs. 27.6%, n = 620, p = 0.054). However 90-day mortality only happened in ASD patients (9.8%, n = 223 vs 0, p = 0.03). ARD patients had more diverticulitis recurrence (46.3%, n = 19 vs 13.4%, n = 303, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified female sex as a protective factor for recurrence [odds ratio (OR) 0.55, p < 0.001] and ARD as a risk factor (OR 8.85, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Operated on in emergency, ARDs have more resection anastomosis, with a similar rate of complications, less mortality, and more recurrence of diverticulitis than ASD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques in Coloproctology\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques in Coloproctology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-024-03024-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-024-03024-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在西方国家,急性右结肠憩室炎(ARD)的发病率低于急性乙状结肠憩室炎(ASD)。我们旨在比较急性右结肠憩室炎和急性乙状结肠憩室炎急诊手术的处理方法:一项回顾性多中心队列研究纳入了所有因 ASD 和 ARD 而接受急诊手术的连续患者(2010-2021 年)。研究人员从法国外科学会成员中心的数据库中筛选出患者。急诊手术是在腹膜炎住院期间或保守治疗失败后进行的。对术后早期和晚期结果进行了研究:结果:共纳入 2297 例患者,其中 ASD 患者 2256 例(98.2%),ARD 患者 41 例(1.8%)。基线特征相似。总体而言,患者的Hinchey分级为3-4级(63.9%,n = 1468,p = 0.287)。ARD多采用切除和吻合术治疗,无论是否有保护措施(53.7%,n = 22),而ASD主要采用切除和末端造口术治疗(62.5%(n = 1409),p 结论:与 ASD 相比,在急诊手术中,ARD 的切除吻合更多,并发症发生率相似,死亡率更低,憩室炎复发率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of surgical management and outcomes of acute right colic and sigmoid diverticulitis: a French national retrospective cohort study.

Background: Acute right colic diverticulitis (ARD) is less frequent in Western countries than acute sigmoid diverticulitis (ASD). We aimed to compare the management of ARD and ASD operated on in emergency.

Methods: All consecutive patients who had emergency surgery for ASD and ARD (2010-2021) were included in a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study. Patients were identified from databases in French centers that were members of the French Surgical Association. Emergency surgery was performed during the same hospitalization for peritonitis or after failure of conservative treatment. Early and late postoperative outcomes were studied.

Results: A total of 2297 patients were included with 2256 (98.2%) ASD and 41 (1.8%) ARD patients. Baseline characteristics were similar. Overall, patients were rated Hinchey 3-4 (63.9%, n = 1468, p = 0.287). ARD was more often treated with resection and anastomosis, protected or not (53.7%, n = 22), whereas ASD was mainly treated with resection and terminal ostomy (62.5% (n = 1409), p < 0.001). Median operative time was shorter for ARD (120 vs 146 min, p = 0.04). The group of ARD patients showed a higher prevalence of Clavien III/IV complications compared to the group of ASD patients, although no statistically significant difference was observed (41.5%, n = 17 vs. 27.6%, n = 620, p = 0.054). However 90-day mortality only happened in ASD patients (9.8%, n = 223 vs 0, p = 0.03). ARD patients had more diverticulitis recurrence (46.3%, n = 19 vs 13.4%, n = 303, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified female sex as a protective factor for recurrence [odds ratio (OR) 0.55, p < 0.001] and ARD as a risk factor (OR 8.85, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Operated on in emergency, ARDs have more resection anastomosis, with a similar rate of complications, less mortality, and more recurrence of diverticulitis than ASD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Techniques in Coloproctology
Techniques in Coloproctology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics covered by the journal. Reviews, original articles, technical notes and short communications with many detailed illustrations render this publication indispensable for coloproctologists and related specialists. Both surgeons and gastroenterologists are represented on the distinguished Editorial Board, together with pathologists, radiologists and basic scientists from all over the world. The journal is strongly recommended to those who wish to be updated on recent developments in the field, and improve the standards of their work. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 86-23 revised 1985) were followed as were applicable national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals). The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. Authors will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill such requirements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信