非药物干预对中风后疼痛的益处:荟萃分析

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Ita Daryanti Saragih, Ira Suarilah, Mulyadi Mulyadi, Ice Septriani Saragih, Bih-O Lee
{"title":"非药物干预对中风后疼痛的益处:荟萃分析","authors":"Ita Daryanti Saragih, Ira Suarilah, Mulyadi Mulyadi, Ice Septriani Saragih, Bih-O Lee","doi":"10.1111/jnu.13032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pain is a frequent post-stroke health concern, and several non-pharmacological interventions are commonly employed to manage it. However, few reviews have examined the effectiveness of such interventions, making it difficult to draw conclusions about their usefulness. Furthermore, subgroup analysis based on post-stroke pain level or intervention characteristics is rarely performed. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions and evaluate the significant factors associated with post-stroke pain through subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant studies were obtained from seven databases, from their commencement up to March 2024, as well as from the gray literature. The PICOS approach was used to evaluate the eligibility criteria of the studies. The RoB-2 tool was used to determine the risk of bias in each randomized trial. Pooled estimations of standardized mean difference and heterogeneity (quantified with I<sup>2</sup>) were obtained using a random-effects model. The stability of the pooled result was then assessed using the leave-one-out approach. STATA 17.0 was used to run the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Non-pharmacological interventions were effective in reducing pain immediately after intervention (pooled SMDs: -0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.06 to -0.53; p < 0.001). The approach involving acupuncture, aquatic therapy, or laser therapy and rehabilitation training was effective for post-stroke hemiplegic shoulder pain. A pooled analysis of non-pharmacological interventions showed that both less than 4 weeks and more than 4 weeks of interventions were effective in alleviating pain in stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-pharmacological approaches appear to be beneficial for reducing post-stroke pain. The outcomes based on the modalities merit further research.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Further studies are needed to determine the effects of different modalities on pain intensity following a stroke. Furthermore, to avoid overestimation of intervention efficacy, future randomized trials should consider blinding approaches to the interventions delivered.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beneficial effects of non-pharmacological interventions for post-stroke pain: A meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ita Daryanti Saragih, Ira Suarilah, Mulyadi Mulyadi, Ice Septriani Saragih, Bih-O Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jnu.13032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pain is a frequent post-stroke health concern, and several non-pharmacological interventions are commonly employed to manage it. However, few reviews have examined the effectiveness of such interventions, making it difficult to draw conclusions about their usefulness. Furthermore, subgroup analysis based on post-stroke pain level or intervention characteristics is rarely performed. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions and evaluate the significant factors associated with post-stroke pain through subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant studies were obtained from seven databases, from their commencement up to March 2024, as well as from the gray literature. The PICOS approach was used to evaluate the eligibility criteria of the studies. The RoB-2 tool was used to determine the risk of bias in each randomized trial. Pooled estimations of standardized mean difference and heterogeneity (quantified with I<sup>2</sup>) were obtained using a random-effects model. The stability of the pooled result was then assessed using the leave-one-out approach. STATA 17.0 was used to run the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Non-pharmacological interventions were effective in reducing pain immediately after intervention (pooled SMDs: -0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.06 to -0.53; p < 0.001). The approach involving acupuncture, aquatic therapy, or laser therapy and rehabilitation training was effective for post-stroke hemiplegic shoulder pain. A pooled analysis of non-pharmacological interventions showed that both less than 4 weeks and more than 4 weeks of interventions were effective in alleviating pain in stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-pharmacological approaches appear to be beneficial for reducing post-stroke pain. The outcomes based on the modalities merit further research.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Further studies are needed to determine the effects of different modalities on pain intensity following a stroke. Furthermore, to avoid overestimation of intervention efficacy, future randomized trials should consider blinding approaches to the interventions delivered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.13032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.13032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:疼痛是中风后经常出现的健康问题,通常会采用一些非药物干预措施来控制疼痛。然而,很少有综述对这些干预措施的有效性进行研究,因此很难就其有用性得出结论。此外,基于卒中后疼痛程度或干预特点的亚组分析也很少进行。本研究旨在调查非药物干预的有效性,并通过亚组分析评估与卒中后疼痛相关的重要因素:设计:系统回顾和荟萃分析:从七个数据库(从开始到 2024 年 3 月)以及灰色文献中获取相关研究。采用 PICOS 方法评估研究的资格标准。采用 RoB-2 工具确定每项随机试验的偏倚风险。采用随机效应模型对标准化均值差异和异质性(用 I2 量化)进行汇总估算。然后采用 "留一剔除 "法评估汇总结果的稳定性。荟萃分析使用 STATA 17.0 进行:结果:非药物干预能有效减轻干预后的疼痛(汇总 SMDs:-0.79;95% 置信区间 [CI]:-1.06 至 -0.53;P 结论:非药物干预能有效减轻干预后的疼痛(汇总 SMDs:-0.79;95% 置信区间 [CI]:-1.06 至 -0.53):非药物治疗方法似乎有利于减轻卒中后疼痛。基于这些方法的结果值得进一步研究:临床相关性:需要进一步研究确定不同方式对中风后疼痛强度的影响。此外,为避免高估干预效果,未来的随机试验应考虑对所提供的干预措施进行盲法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beneficial effects of non-pharmacological interventions for post-stroke pain: A meta-analysis.

Purpose: Pain is a frequent post-stroke health concern, and several non-pharmacological interventions are commonly employed to manage it. However, few reviews have examined the effectiveness of such interventions, making it difficult to draw conclusions about their usefulness. Furthermore, subgroup analysis based on post-stroke pain level or intervention characteristics is rarely performed. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions and evaluate the significant factors associated with post-stroke pain through subgroup analysis.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: Relevant studies were obtained from seven databases, from their commencement up to March 2024, as well as from the gray literature. The PICOS approach was used to evaluate the eligibility criteria of the studies. The RoB-2 tool was used to determine the risk of bias in each randomized trial. Pooled estimations of standardized mean difference and heterogeneity (quantified with I2) were obtained using a random-effects model. The stability of the pooled result was then assessed using the leave-one-out approach. STATA 17.0 was used to run the meta-analysis.

Findings: Non-pharmacological interventions were effective in reducing pain immediately after intervention (pooled SMDs: -0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.06 to -0.53; p < 0.001). The approach involving acupuncture, aquatic therapy, or laser therapy and rehabilitation training was effective for post-stroke hemiplegic shoulder pain. A pooled analysis of non-pharmacological interventions showed that both less than 4 weeks and more than 4 weeks of interventions were effective in alleviating pain in stroke patients.

Conclusion: Non-pharmacological approaches appear to be beneficial for reducing post-stroke pain. The outcomes based on the modalities merit further research.

Clinical relevance: Further studies are needed to determine the effects of different modalities on pain intensity following a stroke. Furthermore, to avoid overestimation of intervention efficacy, future randomized trials should consider blinding approaches to the interventions delivered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信