术中用稀释的聚维酮碘冲洗伤口能否预防脊柱手术的手术部位感染?

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Xiaoping Mu, Xiaodong Wei, Zhuhai Li, Minke Wei, Jianxun Wei
{"title":"术中用稀释的聚维酮碘冲洗伤口能否预防脊柱手术的手术部位感染?","authors":"Xiaoping Mu, Xiaodong Wei, Zhuhai Li, Minke Wei, Jianxun Wei","doi":"10.1530/EOR-24-0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study employed meta-analysis to evaluate whether the application of intraoperative wound irrigation (IOWI) with povidone-iodine (PI) in spine surgery effectively reduces the incidence of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study was conducted strictly following the methodological guidance provided by the Cochrane Handbook. The protocol of this work was registered with PROSPERO. Two researchers independently conducted electronic searches in Medline via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The bias risk of each included study was evaluated by two assessors. We performed statistical analysis on the dataset using STATA software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies involving a total of 6777 patients were included in the present work. The risk of bias of six included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was considered as low-to-moderate risk, and the quality scores of the eight included retrospective cohort studies were rated as high quality. The results of this meta-analysis indicated a significant difference in the incidence of postoperative SSI between the two groups (RR = 0.29, 95% CI: (0.18, 0.47)). Moreover, patients who underwent IOWI with PI had lower rates of deep and superficial infections after spine surgery compared with the controlled group (superficial infection: RR = 0.28, 95%CI: (0.14, 0.54); Deep infection: RR = 0.24, 95%CI: (0.10, 0.60)). The sensitivity analysis results indicated good robustness and high evidence strength after data consolidation in the overall rate of postoperative SSI and the incidence of deep/superficial infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IOWI with PI solution during spinal surgery can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative SSI.</p>","PeriodicalId":48598,"journal":{"name":"Efort Open Reviews","volume":"9 11","pages":"1087-1096"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11619726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does intraoperative wound irrigation with diluted povidone-iodine prevent surgical site infection in spine surgery?\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoping Mu, Xiaodong Wei, Zhuhai Li, Minke Wei, Jianxun Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1530/EOR-24-0091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study employed meta-analysis to evaluate whether the application of intraoperative wound irrigation (IOWI) with povidone-iodine (PI) in spine surgery effectively reduces the incidence of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study was conducted strictly following the methodological guidance provided by the Cochrane Handbook. The protocol of this work was registered with PROSPERO. Two researchers independently conducted electronic searches in Medline via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The bias risk of each included study was evaluated by two assessors. We performed statistical analysis on the dataset using STATA software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies involving a total of 6777 patients were included in the present work. The risk of bias of six included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was considered as low-to-moderate risk, and the quality scores of the eight included retrospective cohort studies were rated as high quality. The results of this meta-analysis indicated a significant difference in the incidence of postoperative SSI between the two groups (RR = 0.29, 95% CI: (0.18, 0.47)). Moreover, patients who underwent IOWI with PI had lower rates of deep and superficial infections after spine surgery compared with the controlled group (superficial infection: RR = 0.28, 95%CI: (0.14, 0.54); Deep infection: RR = 0.24, 95%CI: (0.10, 0.60)). The sensitivity analysis results indicated good robustness and high evidence strength after data consolidation in the overall rate of postoperative SSI and the incidence of deep/superficial infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IOWI with PI solution during spinal surgery can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative SSI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Efort Open Reviews\",\"volume\":\"9 11\",\"pages\":\"1087-1096\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11619726/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Efort Open Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-24-0091\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Efort Open Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-24-0091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究采用荟萃分析法评估脊柱手术中使用聚维酮碘(PI)进行术中伤口冲洗(IOWI)是否能有效降低术后手术部位感染(SSI)的发生率:本研究严格按照 Cochrane 手册提供的方法指导进行。研究方案已在 PROSPERO 注册。两名研究人员通过 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science 独立进行了 Medline 电子检索。每项纳入研究的偏倚风险均由两名评估人员进行评估。我们使用 STATA 软件对数据集进行了统计分析:本研究共纳入 14 项研究,涉及 6777 名患者。纳入的 6 项随机对照试验(RCT)的偏倚风险被视为低至中等风险,纳入的 8 项回顾性队列研究的质量评分被评为高质量。荟萃分析结果表明,两组患者术后 SSI 的发生率存在显著差异(RR = 0.29,95% CI:(0.18, 0.47))。此外,与对照组相比,接受 IOWI 和 PI 的患者在脊柱手术后的深层和表层感染率较低(表层感染:RR=0.28,95%CI:(0.14,0.54);深部感染:RR=0.24,95%CI:(0.10,0.60))。敏感性分析结果表明,经过数据整合后,术后SSI总发生率和深部/浅表感染发生率具有良好的稳健性和较高的证据强度:结论:脊柱手术中使用 PI 溶液进行 IOWI 可以有效降低术后 SSI 的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does intraoperative wound irrigation with diluted povidone-iodine prevent surgical site infection in spine surgery?

Purpose: This study employed meta-analysis to evaluate whether the application of intraoperative wound irrigation (IOWI) with povidone-iodine (PI) in spine surgery effectively reduces the incidence of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI).

Methods: The present study was conducted strictly following the methodological guidance provided by the Cochrane Handbook. The protocol of this work was registered with PROSPERO. Two researchers independently conducted electronic searches in Medline via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The bias risk of each included study was evaluated by two assessors. We performed statistical analysis on the dataset using STATA software.

Results: Fourteen studies involving a total of 6777 patients were included in the present work. The risk of bias of six included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was considered as low-to-moderate risk, and the quality scores of the eight included retrospective cohort studies were rated as high quality. The results of this meta-analysis indicated a significant difference in the incidence of postoperative SSI between the two groups (RR = 0.29, 95% CI: (0.18, 0.47)). Moreover, patients who underwent IOWI with PI had lower rates of deep and superficial infections after spine surgery compared with the controlled group (superficial infection: RR = 0.28, 95%CI: (0.14, 0.54); Deep infection: RR = 0.24, 95%CI: (0.10, 0.60)). The sensitivity analysis results indicated good robustness and high evidence strength after data consolidation in the overall rate of postoperative SSI and the incidence of deep/superficial infection.

Conclusions: IOWI with PI solution during spinal surgery can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative SSI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Efort Open Reviews
Efort Open Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EFORT Open Reviews publishes high-quality instructional review articles across the whole field of orthopaedics and traumatology. Commissioned, peer-reviewed articles from international experts summarize current knowledge and practice in orthopaedics, with the aim of providing systematic coverage of the field. All articles undergo rigorous scientific editing to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and clarity. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will provide integrated CME. It is an authoritative resource for educating trainees and supports practising orthopaedic surgeons in keeping informed about the latest clinical and scientific advances. One print issue containing a selection of papers from the journal will be published each year to coincide with the EFORT Annual Congress. EFORT Open Reviews is the official journal of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) and is published in partnership with The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信