初级保健诊所的健康知识指导减肥干预。

Q2 Medicine
Health literacy research and practice Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.3928/24748307-20240618-01
Terry Davis, Connie Arnold, Dachuan Zhang, Corby K Martin, Robert L Newton, Candice Myers, Kara D Denstel, Emily F Mire, Christoph Höchsmann, John Apolzan, Peter T Katzmarzyk
{"title":"初级保健诊所的健康知识指导减肥干预。","authors":"Terry Davis, Connie Arnold, Dachuan Zhang, Corby K Martin, Robert L Newton, Candice Myers, Kara D Denstel, Emily F Mire, Christoph Höchsmann, John Apolzan, Peter T Katzmarzyk","doi":"10.3928/24748307-20240618-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low income and low health literacy are associated with poorer health knowledge, health behaviors and poor health outcomes. The effectiveness of health literacy-directed weight loss treatment interventions in primary care clinics is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to conduct a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial (PROmoting Successful Weight Loss in Primary CarE in Louisiana ([PROPEL]) to test the effectiveness of a 24-month, patient-centered, literacy-directed obesity treatment program delivered within primary care in an underserved population. This study reports the association between health literacy and program effectiveness, examining potential correlates of weight loss related to patient adherence to the program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly assigned 18 clinics to usual care (UC) or a health literacy-directed lifestyle intervention (HLI). The primary outcome was percent weight loss at 24 months.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Of 803 adult participants (84% women; 67% Black), 31% had limited health literacy. Patients in UC lost an average of 0.44%of their enrollment weight after 24 months. Those with adequate literacy lost 0.57% and those with limited literacy lost 0.30%, which was not significantly different. The HLI patient group lost an average of 4.9% of their enrollment weight. Those with adequate literacy lost 5.2% and those with limited literacy, 4.7%, which was not significantly different. The advantage of adequate health literacy was consistent across the 24-month study period, though not significant. Patients in the HLI group with adequate health literacy had greater percent weight loss by a margin of 0.50 ± 0.75 (<i>p</i> = .50), while the UC margin was 0.27 ± 0.84 (<i>p</i> = .74). The percent weight loss difference between HLI and UC groups was 4.6 ± 0.8 (<i>p</i> < .001) among patients with adequate health literacy and 4.4 ± 1.0 (<i>p</i> < .001) among patients with limited health literacy. The difference in percent weight loss between the HLI and UC groups was 0.2 ± 1.1 (<i>p</i> = .84) higher for adequate literacy patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A health literacy directed health coaching intervention in community clinics led to significant weight loss over 24 months but did not vary by level of patient health literacy. [<b><i>HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice</i>. 2024;8(4):e204-e211.</b>].</p>","PeriodicalId":36651,"journal":{"name":"Health literacy research and practice","volume":"8 4","pages":"e204-e211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540448/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Literacy Directed Weight Loss Intervention in Primary Care Clinics.\",\"authors\":\"Terry Davis, Connie Arnold, Dachuan Zhang, Corby K Martin, Robert L Newton, Candice Myers, Kara D Denstel, Emily F Mire, Christoph Höchsmann, John Apolzan, Peter T Katzmarzyk\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/24748307-20240618-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low income and low health literacy are associated with poorer health knowledge, health behaviors and poor health outcomes. The effectiveness of health literacy-directed weight loss treatment interventions in primary care clinics is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to conduct a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial (PROmoting Successful Weight Loss in Primary CarE in Louisiana ([PROPEL]) to test the effectiveness of a 24-month, patient-centered, literacy-directed obesity treatment program delivered within primary care in an underserved population. This study reports the association between health literacy and program effectiveness, examining potential correlates of weight loss related to patient adherence to the program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly assigned 18 clinics to usual care (UC) or a health literacy-directed lifestyle intervention (HLI). The primary outcome was percent weight loss at 24 months.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Of 803 adult participants (84% women; 67% Black), 31% had limited health literacy. Patients in UC lost an average of 0.44%of their enrollment weight after 24 months. Those with adequate literacy lost 0.57% and those with limited literacy lost 0.30%, which was not significantly different. The HLI patient group lost an average of 4.9% of their enrollment weight. Those with adequate literacy lost 5.2% and those with limited literacy, 4.7%, which was not significantly different. The advantage of adequate health literacy was consistent across the 24-month study period, though not significant. Patients in the HLI group with adequate health literacy had greater percent weight loss by a margin of 0.50 ± 0.75 (<i>p</i> = .50), while the UC margin was 0.27 ± 0.84 (<i>p</i> = .74). The percent weight loss difference between HLI and UC groups was 4.6 ± 0.8 (<i>p</i> < .001) among patients with adequate health literacy and 4.4 ± 1.0 (<i>p</i> < .001) among patients with limited health literacy. The difference in percent weight loss between the HLI and UC groups was 0.2 ± 1.1 (<i>p</i> = .84) higher for adequate literacy patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A health literacy directed health coaching intervention in community clinics led to significant weight loss over 24 months but did not vary by level of patient health literacy. [<b><i>HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice</i>. 2024;8(4):e204-e211.</b>].</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health literacy research and practice\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"e204-e211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540448/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health literacy research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20240618-01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health literacy research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20240618-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:低收入和低健康素养与较差的健康知识、健康行为和较差的健康结果有关。在初级保健诊所中,以健康素养为导向的减肥治疗干预措施的有效性尚缺乏研究:本研究旨在开展一项务实的分组随机试验(PROmoting Successful Weight Loss in Primary CarE in Louisiana([PROPEL])),以测试在初级保健中针对服务不足人群开展的为期 24 个月、以患者为中心、以健康素养为导向的肥胖治疗项目的有效性。本研究报告了健康素养与项目效果之间的关联,并探讨了与患者坚持项目有关的体重减轻的潜在关联因素:我们将 18 家诊所随机分配给常规护理(UC)或健康素养指导的生活方式干预(HLI)。主要结果是 24 个月后体重减轻的百分比:在 803 名成年参与者(84% 为女性;67% 为黑人)中,31% 的人健康素养有限。24 个月后,UC 患者的体重平均下降了 0.44%。识字水平足够的患者体重减轻了 0.57%,识字水平有限的患者体重减轻了 0.30%,两者没有明显差异。HLI患者组平均体重减轻了4.9%。识字水平足够的患者体重减轻了 5.2%,识字水平有限的患者体重减轻了 4.7%,差异不大。在为期 24 个月的研究中,健康素养达标者的优势是一致的,但并不显著。健康素养充足的 HLI 组患者的体重减轻率为 0.50 ± 0.75(p = .50),而 UC 组患者的体重减轻率为 0.27 ± 0.84(p = .74)。在健康知识掌握充分的患者中,HLI 组和 UC 组的体重减轻百分比差异为 4.6 ± 0.8(p < .001),在健康知识掌握有限的患者中,HLI 组和 UC 组的体重减轻百分比差异为 4.4 ± 1.0(p < .001)。在健康素养充足的患者中,HLI组和UC组的体重减轻百分比差异为0.2 ± 1.1 (p = .84):结论:在社区诊所开展以健康素养为导向的健康指导干预,可在 24 个月内显著减轻体重,但患者的健康素养水平并无差异。[HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2024;8(4):e204-e211.]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health Literacy Directed Weight Loss Intervention in Primary Care Clinics.

Background: Low income and low health literacy are associated with poorer health knowledge, health behaviors and poor health outcomes. The effectiveness of health literacy-directed weight loss treatment interventions in primary care clinics is lacking.

Objective: The aim of this study was to conduct a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial (PROmoting Successful Weight Loss in Primary CarE in Louisiana ([PROPEL]) to test the effectiveness of a 24-month, patient-centered, literacy-directed obesity treatment program delivered within primary care in an underserved population. This study reports the association between health literacy and program effectiveness, examining potential correlates of weight loss related to patient adherence to the program.

Methods: We randomly assigned 18 clinics to usual care (UC) or a health literacy-directed lifestyle intervention (HLI). The primary outcome was percent weight loss at 24 months.

Key results: Of 803 adult participants (84% women; 67% Black), 31% had limited health literacy. Patients in UC lost an average of 0.44%of their enrollment weight after 24 months. Those with adequate literacy lost 0.57% and those with limited literacy lost 0.30%, which was not significantly different. The HLI patient group lost an average of 4.9% of their enrollment weight. Those with adequate literacy lost 5.2% and those with limited literacy, 4.7%, which was not significantly different. The advantage of adequate health literacy was consistent across the 24-month study period, though not significant. Patients in the HLI group with adequate health literacy had greater percent weight loss by a margin of 0.50 ± 0.75 (p = .50), while the UC margin was 0.27 ± 0.84 (p = .74). The percent weight loss difference between HLI and UC groups was 4.6 ± 0.8 (p < .001) among patients with adequate health literacy and 4.4 ± 1.0 (p < .001) among patients with limited health literacy. The difference in percent weight loss between the HLI and UC groups was 0.2 ± 1.1 (p = .84) higher for adequate literacy patients.

Conclusions: A health literacy directed health coaching intervention in community clinics led to significant weight loss over 24 months but did not vary by level of patient health literacy. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2024;8(4):e204-e211.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health literacy research and practice
Health literacy research and practice Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信