在一项实用性试验中,对身心互补和综合保健疗法有效性的初步认识如何影响长期坚持治疗的情况。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnae070
Steven B Zeliadt, Scott Coggeshall, Xiaoyi Zhang, Ethan W Rosser, David E Reed Ii, A Rani Elwy, Barbara G Bokhour, Joy A Toyama, Stephanie L Taylor
{"title":"在一项实用性试验中,对身心互补和综合保健疗法有效性的初步认识如何影响长期坚持治疗的情况。","authors":"Steven B Zeliadt, Scott Coggeshall, Xiaoyi Zhang, Ethan W Rosser, David E Reed Ii, A Rani Elwy, Barbara G Bokhour, Joy A Toyama, Stephanie L Taylor","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnae070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Beliefs and perceptions about pain intervention effectiveness when initiating a therapy may influence long-term engagement. This study examines how early perceived effectiveness of complementary and integrative health therapies impacts long-term engagement in a pragmatic trial context.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain participating in a pragmatic trial of provider-delivered complementary and integrative health therapies (acupuncture, chiropractic care, or massage therapy) used alone compared to combining those therapies with self-care therapies (yoga, Tai Chi/Qigong, or meditation). This analysis focuses on 1713 participants using self-care therapies at baseline.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>18 Veterans Healthcare Administration Medical Facilities.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Predictors of total self-care complementary and integrative health therapy sessions over a 6-month assessment period were assessed using linear regression to determine how strongly perceptions of initial therapy effectiveness was associated with total utilization. Perception of initial therapy effectiveness was assessed at study entry across four domains (pain, mental health, fatigue, and general well-being).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 56% (1032/1713) of Veterans reported a positive perceived effectiveness of their recent complementary and integrative health therapy use at study initiation. Older individuals and those using meditation were more likely to report early positive perceptions. Mean number of therapy sessions over the 6-month study was 11 (range 1 to 168). Early positive perceptions had a small effect on overall use, increasing mean sessions by 2.5 (1.3 to 3.6). Other factors such as recent physical therapy use and distance to primary care explained more variation in total utilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pragmatic pain trials should examine factors associated with engagement across assigned treatment protocols, especially if any of the treatment protocols being tested are sensitive to long-term engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":"25 Supplement_1","pages":"S54-S63"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548863/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How initial perceptions of the effectiveness of mind and body complementary and integrative health therapies influence long-term adherence in a pragmatic trial.\",\"authors\":\"Steven B Zeliadt, Scott Coggeshall, Xiaoyi Zhang, Ethan W Rosser, David E Reed Ii, A Rani Elwy, Barbara G Bokhour, Joy A Toyama, Stephanie L Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pm/pnae070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Beliefs and perceptions about pain intervention effectiveness when initiating a therapy may influence long-term engagement. This study examines how early perceived effectiveness of complementary and integrative health therapies impacts long-term engagement in a pragmatic trial context.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain participating in a pragmatic trial of provider-delivered complementary and integrative health therapies (acupuncture, chiropractic care, or massage therapy) used alone compared to combining those therapies with self-care therapies (yoga, Tai Chi/Qigong, or meditation). This analysis focuses on 1713 participants using self-care therapies at baseline.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>18 Veterans Healthcare Administration Medical Facilities.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Predictors of total self-care complementary and integrative health therapy sessions over a 6-month assessment period were assessed using linear regression to determine how strongly perceptions of initial therapy effectiveness was associated with total utilization. Perception of initial therapy effectiveness was assessed at study entry across four domains (pain, mental health, fatigue, and general well-being).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 56% (1032/1713) of Veterans reported a positive perceived effectiveness of their recent complementary and integrative health therapy use at study initiation. Older individuals and those using meditation were more likely to report early positive perceptions. Mean number of therapy sessions over the 6-month study was 11 (range 1 to 168). Early positive perceptions had a small effect on overall use, increasing mean sessions by 2.5 (1.3 to 3.6). Other factors such as recent physical therapy use and distance to primary care explained more variation in total utilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pragmatic pain trials should examine factors associated with engagement across assigned treatment protocols, especially if any of the treatment protocols being tested are sensitive to long-term engagement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 Supplement_1\",\"pages\":\"S54-S63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548863/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnae070\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnae070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在开始接受治疗时,对疼痛干预效果的信念和看法可能会影响长期参与度。本研究探讨了在一项实用性试验中,早期感知的补充和综合健康疗法的有效性如何影响长期参与度:患有慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的退伍军人,他们参加了由医疗服务提供者提供的补充和综合健康疗法(针灸、整脊或按摩疗法)单独使用与将这些疗法与自我保健疗法(瑜伽、太极/气功或冥想)相结合的实用性试验。本分析主要针对基线使用自我保健疗法的 1713 名参与者:18家退伍军人医疗保健管理局医疗机构:设计:前瞻性队列研究:在为期 6 个月的评估期间,采用线性回归法对自我保健补充疗法和综合保健疗法总疗程的预测因素进行评估,以确定对初始疗法有效性的认知与总利用率之间的关联程度。在研究开始时,对初始治疗效果的感知在四个领域(疼痛、心理健康、疲劳和总体健康)进行评估:总共有 56% 的退伍军人(1032/1713)在研究开始时对他们最近使用的补充和综合保健疗法的有效性有积极的认知。年长者和使用冥想疗法的退伍军人更有可能在早期报告积极的感知。在为期 6 个月的研究中,平均治疗次数为 11 次(1 至 168 次不等)。早期的积极认知对总体治疗次数的影响较小,平均治疗次数增加了 2.5 次(1.3 至 3.6 次)。其他因素,如最近使用物理治疗和距离初级医疗机构的远近,则可以解释总使用量的更多变化:结论:务实的疼痛试验应检查与指定治疗方案中参与度相关的因素,尤其是如果测试的治疗方案对长期参与度敏感的话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How initial perceptions of the effectiveness of mind and body complementary and integrative health therapies influence long-term adherence in a pragmatic trial.

Objective: Beliefs and perceptions about pain intervention effectiveness when initiating a therapy may influence long-term engagement. This study examines how early perceived effectiveness of complementary and integrative health therapies impacts long-term engagement in a pragmatic trial context.

Participants: Veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain participating in a pragmatic trial of provider-delivered complementary and integrative health therapies (acupuncture, chiropractic care, or massage therapy) used alone compared to combining those therapies with self-care therapies (yoga, Tai Chi/Qigong, or meditation). This analysis focuses on 1713 participants using self-care therapies at baseline.

Setting: 18 Veterans Healthcare Administration Medical Facilities.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Methods: Predictors of total self-care complementary and integrative health therapy sessions over a 6-month assessment period were assessed using linear regression to determine how strongly perceptions of initial therapy effectiveness was associated with total utilization. Perception of initial therapy effectiveness was assessed at study entry across four domains (pain, mental health, fatigue, and general well-being).

Results: In total, 56% (1032/1713) of Veterans reported a positive perceived effectiveness of their recent complementary and integrative health therapy use at study initiation. Older individuals and those using meditation were more likely to report early positive perceptions. Mean number of therapy sessions over the 6-month study was 11 (range 1 to 168). Early positive perceptions had a small effect on overall use, increasing mean sessions by 2.5 (1.3 to 3.6). Other factors such as recent physical therapy use and distance to primary care explained more variation in total utilization.

Conclusions: Pragmatic pain trials should examine factors associated with engagement across assigned treatment protocols, especially if any of the treatment protocols being tested are sensitive to long-term engagement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信