在临床护理、健康研究和人口健康评估中衡量全人的福祉:第 XVIII 届退伍军人健康管理局最新会议的结论和建议》。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Medical Care Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000002084
Dawne Vogt, Benjamin Kligler, Kathleen Darchuk, Eric Elbogen, Justin M List, Tara McMullen, Jennifer L Murphy, Barbara Bokhour
{"title":"在临床护理、健康研究和人口健康评估中衡量全人的福祉:第 XVIII 届退伍军人健康管理局最新会议的结论和建议》。","authors":"Dawne Vogt, Benjamin Kligler, Kathleen Darchuk, Eric Elbogen, Justin M List, Tara McMullen, Jennifer L Murphy, Barbara Bokhour","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In 2023, the U.S. Veterans Health Administration convened a State of the Art meeting to evaluate the existing evidence and make recommendations for measuring the well-being of the whole person in clinical care, health research, and population health evaluation. In this article, we describe findings and recommendations concerning each of these health care system functions, as well as key takeaways from the meeting as a whole.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been a growing call for health care organizations to expand their focus beyond disease-based concepts to consider both positive aspects of health and indicators of well-being that extend beyond the health domain. Yet, knowledge remains limited regarding how best to integrate these types of measurements in clinical care, health research, and population health evaluation efforts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>State of the Art activities were organized into 3 workstreams, each focused on a core health care system function (clinical care, health research, and population health evaluation). Drawing from existing literature on the measurement of the well-being of the whole person in the assigned health care function, workgroups evaluated the existing state of knowledge and made recommendations for future work on well-being measurement in the health care setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cross-cutting themes included: (1) difficulty evaluating the current state of knowledge due to varied use of terminology in this literature; (2) appreciation for the value of well-being measurement in each health care function; (3) need for additional research on the use and benefits of well-being measures, including their role as predictors and moderators of health and health care outcomes; (4) importance of ensuring that measures are applicable for diverse patient groups and adequately reflect the \"patient voice;\" and (5) need for additional leadership investment and resource allocation to support use of these measures in the health care setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Knowledge from this meeting can be applied to enhance the use and application of measurement of well-being to improve patients' health and health care outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":"62 12 Suppl 1","pages":"S4-S12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the Well-Being of the Whole Person in Clinical Care, Health Research, and Population Health Evaluation: Findings and Recommendations From the XVIII Veterans Health Administration State of the Art Meeting.\",\"authors\":\"Dawne Vogt, Benjamin Kligler, Kathleen Darchuk, Eric Elbogen, Justin M List, Tara McMullen, Jennifer L Murphy, Barbara Bokhour\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In 2023, the U.S. Veterans Health Administration convened a State of the Art meeting to evaluate the existing evidence and make recommendations for measuring the well-being of the whole person in clinical care, health research, and population health evaluation. In this article, we describe findings and recommendations concerning each of these health care system functions, as well as key takeaways from the meeting as a whole.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been a growing call for health care organizations to expand their focus beyond disease-based concepts to consider both positive aspects of health and indicators of well-being that extend beyond the health domain. Yet, knowledge remains limited regarding how best to integrate these types of measurements in clinical care, health research, and population health evaluation efforts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>State of the Art activities were organized into 3 workstreams, each focused on a core health care system function (clinical care, health research, and population health evaluation). Drawing from existing literature on the measurement of the well-being of the whole person in the assigned health care function, workgroups evaluated the existing state of knowledge and made recommendations for future work on well-being measurement in the health care setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cross-cutting themes included: (1) difficulty evaluating the current state of knowledge due to varied use of terminology in this literature; (2) appreciation for the value of well-being measurement in each health care function; (3) need for additional research on the use and benefits of well-being measures, including their role as predictors and moderators of health and health care outcomes; (4) importance of ensuring that measures are applicable for diverse patient groups and adequately reflect the \\\"patient voice;\\\" and (5) need for additional leadership investment and resource allocation to support use of these measures in the health care setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Knowledge from this meeting can be applied to enhance the use and application of measurement of well-being to improve patients' health and health care outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Care\",\"volume\":\"62 12 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"S4-S12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548809/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002084\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002084","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:2023 年,美国退伍军人健康管理局召开了一次 "艺术现状 "会议,对现有证据进行评估,并就衡量临床护理、健康研究和人口健康评估中的全人福祉提出建议。在本文中,我们将介绍与这些医疗保健系统功能有关的发现和建议,以及整个会议的主要收获:越来越多的人呼吁医疗机构将关注点从基于疾病的概念扩展到考虑健康的积极方面以及超出健康领域的幸福指标。然而,对于如何在临床护理、健康研究和人口健康评估工作中最好地整合这些类型的衡量指标,人们的了解仍然有限:方法:"艺术现状 "活动分为 3 个工作流,每个工作流都侧重于医疗保健系统的核心功能(临床护理、健康研究和人口健康评估)。各工作组从现有文献中汲取了有关在指定医疗保健职能中衡量全人福祉的内容,对现有知识状况进行了评估,并就今后在医疗保健环境中衡量福祉的工作提出了建议:交叉主题包括结果:交叉主题包括:(1) 由于文献中使用的术语不同,评估现有知识状况存在困难;(2) 认识到幸福感测量在每项医疗保健职能中的价值;(3) 需要对幸福感测量的使用和益处进行更多研究,包括其作为健康和医疗保健结果的预测因子和调节因子的作用;(4) 确保测量适用于不同患者群体并充分反映 "患者声音 "的重要性;(5) 需要更多的领导投资和资源分配,以支持在医疗保健环境中使用这些测量:本次会议的知识可用于加强幸福感测量的使用和应用,以改善患者的健康和医疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring the Well-Being of the Whole Person in Clinical Care, Health Research, and Population Health Evaluation: Findings and Recommendations From the XVIII Veterans Health Administration State of the Art Meeting.

Objectives: In 2023, the U.S. Veterans Health Administration convened a State of the Art meeting to evaluate the existing evidence and make recommendations for measuring the well-being of the whole person in clinical care, health research, and population health evaluation. In this article, we describe findings and recommendations concerning each of these health care system functions, as well as key takeaways from the meeting as a whole.

Background: There has been a growing call for health care organizations to expand their focus beyond disease-based concepts to consider both positive aspects of health and indicators of well-being that extend beyond the health domain. Yet, knowledge remains limited regarding how best to integrate these types of measurements in clinical care, health research, and population health evaluation efforts.

Method: State of the Art activities were organized into 3 workstreams, each focused on a core health care system function (clinical care, health research, and population health evaluation). Drawing from existing literature on the measurement of the well-being of the whole person in the assigned health care function, workgroups evaluated the existing state of knowledge and made recommendations for future work on well-being measurement in the health care setting.

Results: Cross-cutting themes included: (1) difficulty evaluating the current state of knowledge due to varied use of terminology in this literature; (2) appreciation for the value of well-being measurement in each health care function; (3) need for additional research on the use and benefits of well-being measures, including their role as predictors and moderators of health and health care outcomes; (4) importance of ensuring that measures are applicable for diverse patient groups and adequately reflect the "patient voice;" and (5) need for additional leadership investment and resource allocation to support use of these measures in the health care setting.

Conclusions: Knowledge from this meeting can be applied to enhance the use and application of measurement of well-being to improve patients' health and health care outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信