在全人临床护理过程中衡量患者的健康状况:退伍军人健康管理局 Well-Beings Signs 实施试点的经验教训。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000002054
Bella Etingen, Adena Cohen-Bearak, Omonyele L Adjognon, Dawne Vogt, Timothy P Hogan, Lauren Gaj, Michelle B Orner, Anna M Barker, Barbara G Bokhour
{"title":"在全人临床护理过程中衡量患者的健康状况:退伍军人健康管理局 Well-Beings Signs 实施试点的经验教训。","authors":"Bella Etingen, Adena Cohen-Bearak, Omonyele L Adjognon, Dawne Vogt, Timothy P Hogan, Lauren Gaj, Michelle B Orner, Anna M Barker, Barbara G Bokhour","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measuring patient well-being during clinical care may enhance patient-centered communication and treatment planning. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) piloted the use of the Well-Being Signs (WBS), a self-report measure of psychosocial well-being, in clinical care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand early WBS implementation and health care team member experiences with its use before developing detailed support materials and finalizing the measure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of the WBS implementation pilot at 4 VHA facilities, including surveys of (n=4) Whole Health (WH) leaders/clinical leads, and semi-structured interviews with (n=11) clinical leads and team members. Survey data were characterized using descriptive statistics; interview data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Facilities supported WBS implementation by disseminating information to clinical team members, primarily during staff meetings (3/4 facilities), individual discussions (3/4), and email (3/4); only half provided training sessions. In interviews, some care team members expressed the need for more training on using the WBS in clinical care. Some interviewees also provided suggestions for changes to the draft measure, including response option format and question look-back period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there have been growing calls for attention to patient well-being in clinical care, our results suggest barriers to the implementation of well-being measures in this context. Findings were used to inform the development of enhanced training materials and make modifications to enhance the acceptability of the WBS to providers. Other identified barriers will need to be addressed in future implementation efforts, including bolstering leadership support and easing the added time and burden of administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548808/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Patient Well-Being During Whole-Person Clinical Care: Lessons From the Veterans Health Administration Well-Beings Signs Implementation Pilot.\",\"authors\":\"Bella Etingen, Adena Cohen-Bearak, Omonyele L Adjognon, Dawne Vogt, Timothy P Hogan, Lauren Gaj, Michelle B Orner, Anna M Barker, Barbara G Bokhour\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Measuring patient well-being during clinical care may enhance patient-centered communication and treatment planning. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) piloted the use of the Well-Being Signs (WBS), a self-report measure of psychosocial well-being, in clinical care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand early WBS implementation and health care team member experiences with its use before developing detailed support materials and finalizing the measure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of the WBS implementation pilot at 4 VHA facilities, including surveys of (n=4) Whole Health (WH) leaders/clinical leads, and semi-structured interviews with (n=11) clinical leads and team members. Survey data were characterized using descriptive statistics; interview data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Facilities supported WBS implementation by disseminating information to clinical team members, primarily during staff meetings (3/4 facilities), individual discussions (3/4), and email (3/4); only half provided training sessions. In interviews, some care team members expressed the need for more training on using the WBS in clinical care. Some interviewees also provided suggestions for changes to the draft measure, including response option format and question look-back period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there have been growing calls for attention to patient well-being in clinical care, our results suggest barriers to the implementation of well-being measures in this context. Findings were used to inform the development of enhanced training materials and make modifications to enhance the acceptability of the WBS to providers. Other identified barriers will need to be addressed in future implementation efforts, including bolstering leadership support and easing the added time and burden of administration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548808/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002054\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在临床护理过程中测量患者的健康状况可以加强以患者为中心的沟通和治疗计划。退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)试行在临床护理中使用 "幸福体征"(WBS),这是一种自我报告的心理社会幸福感测量方法:在制定详细的支持材料和最终确定测量方法之前,了解 WBS 的早期实施情况和医疗团队成员的使用体验:我们对 4 家退伍军人医疗保健机构的 WBS 实施试点进行了混合方法评估,包括对(人数=4)整体健康(WH)领导/临床负责人进行调查,以及对(人数=11)临床负责人和团队成员进行半结构化访谈。调查数据采用描述性统计;访谈数据采用快速定性分析:医疗机构主要通过员工会议(3/4 家医疗机构)、个别讨论(3/4 家医疗机构)和电子邮件(3/4 家医疗机构)向临床团队成员传播信息,以支持 WBS 的实施;只有一半医疗机构提供了培训课程。在访谈中,一些护理小组成员表示需要更多关于在临床护理中使用 WBS 的培训。一些受访者还对测量草案提出了修改建议,包括回答选项格式和问题回溯期:尽管在临床护理中关注患者福祉的呼声越来越高,但我们的研究结果表明,在这种情况下实施福祉测量存在障碍。我们利用研究结果编写了强化培训教材,并对其进行了修改,以提高服务提供者对 WBS 的接受度。在未来的实施工作中,还需要解决其他已发现的障碍,包括加强领导层的支持和减轻管理所增加的时间和负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring Patient Well-Being During Whole-Person Clinical Care: Lessons From the Veterans Health Administration Well-Beings Signs Implementation Pilot.

Background: Measuring patient well-being during clinical care may enhance patient-centered communication and treatment planning. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) piloted the use of the Well-Being Signs (WBS), a self-report measure of psychosocial well-being, in clinical care.

Objective: To understand early WBS implementation and health care team member experiences with its use before developing detailed support materials and finalizing the measure.

Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of the WBS implementation pilot at 4 VHA facilities, including surveys of (n=4) Whole Health (WH) leaders/clinical leads, and semi-structured interviews with (n=11) clinical leads and team members. Survey data were characterized using descriptive statistics; interview data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis.

Results: Facilities supported WBS implementation by disseminating information to clinical team members, primarily during staff meetings (3/4 facilities), individual discussions (3/4), and email (3/4); only half provided training sessions. In interviews, some care team members expressed the need for more training on using the WBS in clinical care. Some interviewees also provided suggestions for changes to the draft measure, including response option format and question look-back period.

Conclusions: Although there have been growing calls for attention to patient well-being in clinical care, our results suggest barriers to the implementation of well-being measures in this context. Findings were used to inform the development of enhanced training materials and make modifications to enhance the acceptability of the WBS to providers. Other identified barriers will need to be addressed in future implementation efforts, including bolstering leadership support and easing the added time and burden of administration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信