Yasmina Hachem, Joshua Lakin, Winifred Teuteberg, Amelia Cullinan, Matthew J Gonzales, Charlotta Lindvall, Pallavi Kumar, Laura Dingfield, Laurel Kilpatrick, Jeff Greenwald, Angela Miller, Tamra Keeney, Erik K Fromme, Joanna Paladino
{"title":"电子病历重症对话仪表板:实施案例系列。","authors":"Yasmina Hachem, Joshua Lakin, Winifred Teuteberg, Amelia Cullinan, Matthew J Gonzales, Charlotta Lindvall, Pallavi Kumar, Laura Dingfield, Laurel Kilpatrick, Jeff Greenwald, Angela Miller, Tamra Keeney, Erik K Fromme, Joanna Paladino","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.10.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dashboards are used to track and visualize quality indicators within health systems to improve clinical performance. Structured serious illness conversation (SIC) documentation templates within electronic health records (EHR) have enabled the development of SIC dashboards for quality improvement. Little is known about the successes and challenges of SIC dashboards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This implementation case series describes findings from semi-structured interviews and surveys with nine palliative care leaders in eight health systems that implemented SIC dashboards. Interviews and case information were analyzed to identify themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five themes were identified. First, dashboards focus on process metrics. By creating transparent and efficient access to data on EHR-documented SICs, dashboards facilitated monitoring of the results of clinician training and quality improvement efforts. Second, palliative care leaders used dashboard data on documented SICs to implement clinician practice change strategies (e.g. data feedback; quality incentives), but clinicians had mixed reactions to data. Third, dashboards facilitated leadership investment in SIC efforts and required financial and technical resources to build and maintain. Fourth, while dashboards streamlined data collection for implementation teams, participants noted challenges with data reliability, including inadequate clinician use of structured SIC documentation templates (which most dashboards rely on for measurement). Fifth, needs and tensions arose with integrating patient-centered outcome measures as part of dashboards.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dashboards can be powerful tools for identifying gaps in SIC and driving interventions for clinician practice change. However, challenges related to clinician adoption of structured templates for SIC documentation and mixed clinician receptivity to data feedback may limit their reliability and use.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":"e139-e146"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic Health Record Serious Illness Conversation Dashboards: An Implementation Case Series.\",\"authors\":\"Yasmina Hachem, Joshua Lakin, Winifred Teuteberg, Amelia Cullinan, Matthew J Gonzales, Charlotta Lindvall, Pallavi Kumar, Laura Dingfield, Laurel Kilpatrick, Jeff Greenwald, Angela Miller, Tamra Keeney, Erik K Fromme, Joanna Paladino\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.10.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dashboards are used to track and visualize quality indicators within health systems to improve clinical performance. Structured serious illness conversation (SIC) documentation templates within electronic health records (EHR) have enabled the development of SIC dashboards for quality improvement. Little is known about the successes and challenges of SIC dashboards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This implementation case series describes findings from semi-structured interviews and surveys with nine palliative care leaders in eight health systems that implemented SIC dashboards. Interviews and case information were analyzed to identify themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five themes were identified. First, dashboards focus on process metrics. By creating transparent and efficient access to data on EHR-documented SICs, dashboards facilitated monitoring of the results of clinician training and quality improvement efforts. Second, palliative care leaders used dashboard data on documented SICs to implement clinician practice change strategies (e.g. data feedback; quality incentives), but clinicians had mixed reactions to data. Third, dashboards facilitated leadership investment in SIC efforts and required financial and technical resources to build and maintain. Fourth, while dashboards streamlined data collection for implementation teams, participants noted challenges with data reliability, including inadequate clinician use of structured SIC documentation templates (which most dashboards rely on for measurement). Fifth, needs and tensions arose with integrating patient-centered outcome measures as part of dashboards.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dashboards can be powerful tools for identifying gaps in SIC and driving interventions for clinician practice change. However, challenges related to clinician adoption of structured templates for SIC documentation and mixed clinician receptivity to data feedback may limit their reliability and use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e139-e146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.10.032\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.10.032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:仪表板用于跟踪和直观显示医疗系统内的质量指标,以提高临床绩效。电子病历(EHR)中的结构化重症会话(SIC)文档模板使得开发用于质量改进的 SIC 面板成为可能。人们对 SIC 面板的成功经验和挑战知之甚少:本实施案例系列描述了对八个医疗系统中九位实施了 SIC 面板的姑息关怀领导者进行的半结构化访谈和调查的结果。对访谈和案例信息进行分析,以确定主题:结果:确定了五个主题。首先,仪表盘侧重于流程指标。通过透明、高效地获取电子病历记录的 SIC 数据,仪表板有助于监测临床医生培训和质量改进工作的成果。其次,姑息关怀领导者利用仪表板上记录的 SIC 数据来实施临床医生实践变革策略(如数据反馈;质量激励),但临床医生对数据的反应不一。第三,仪表盘促进了领导层对 SIC 工作的投资,需要财政和技术资源来建立和维护。第四,虽然仪表盘简化了实施团队的数据收集工作,但参与者也注意到数据可靠性方面的挑战,包括临床医生对结构化 SIC 文件模板(大多数仪表盘都依赖于该模板进行测量)的使用不足。第五,在将以患者为中心的结果测量纳入仪表盘时出现了需求和矛盾:总结:仪表盘可以成为发现 SIC 差距和推动临床医生实践变革干预的有力工具。然而,临床医生在采用结构化模板记录 SIC 方面存在挑战,而且临床医生对数据反馈的接受程度参差不齐,这可能会限制仪表板的可靠性和使用。
Electronic Health Record Serious Illness Conversation Dashboards: An Implementation Case Series.
Introduction: Dashboards are used to track and visualize quality indicators within health systems to improve clinical performance. Structured serious illness conversation (SIC) documentation templates within electronic health records (EHR) have enabled the development of SIC dashboards for quality improvement. Little is known about the successes and challenges of SIC dashboards.
Methods: This implementation case series describes findings from semi-structured interviews and surveys with nine palliative care leaders in eight health systems that implemented SIC dashboards. Interviews and case information were analyzed to identify themes.
Results: Five themes were identified. First, dashboards focus on process metrics. By creating transparent and efficient access to data on EHR-documented SICs, dashboards facilitated monitoring of the results of clinician training and quality improvement efforts. Second, palliative care leaders used dashboard data on documented SICs to implement clinician practice change strategies (e.g. data feedback; quality incentives), but clinicians had mixed reactions to data. Third, dashboards facilitated leadership investment in SIC efforts and required financial and technical resources to build and maintain. Fourth, while dashboards streamlined data collection for implementation teams, participants noted challenges with data reliability, including inadequate clinician use of structured SIC documentation templates (which most dashboards rely on for measurement). Fifth, needs and tensions arose with integrating patient-centered outcome measures as part of dashboards.
Conclusion: Dashboards can be powerful tools for identifying gaps in SIC and driving interventions for clinician practice change. However, challenges related to clinician adoption of structured templates for SIC documentation and mixed clinician receptivity to data feedback may limit their reliability and use.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.