用于诊断疑似骨关节结核的骨关节组织元基因组下一代测序。

IF 3.7 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Guangxuan Yan, Zhifeng Liu, Tianlu Teng, Weijie Dong, Tinglong Lan, Jun Fan, Kai Tang, Shibing Qin, Wenjuan Nie
{"title":"用于诊断疑似骨关节结核的骨关节组织元基因组下一代测序。","authors":"Guangxuan Yan, Zhifeng Liu, Tianlu Teng, Weijie Dong, Tinglong Lan, Jun Fan, Kai Tang, Shibing Qin, Wenjuan Nie","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.03598-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of the study is to determine the accuracy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing osteoarticular tuberculosis (TB) infection and to compare it with mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT) and Xpert assays. We retrospectively analyzed 162 patients admitted with suspected osteoarticular TB. Osteoarticular tissue (66.67%) and abscess specimens (33.33%) from patients were tested for MGIT, GeneXpert/RIF, and mNGS. mNGS assay detected 76 cases (46.9%) with bacterial, 63 cases (38.9%) with mycobacterial, 22 cases (13.6%) with fungal, and 1 case (0.6%) with actinomycetal organisms. These 162 pathogens were classified into 21 species. The most frequent species detected was <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex</i> (29.0%), followed by <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (20.4%), <i>Mycobacterium abscessus</i> (5.6%), and <i>Candida albicans</i> (5.6%). Taking the \"gold standard\" TB diagnosis as the standard, the positive predictive values of mNGS, Xpert, and MGIT culture were both 100.00%. The negative predictive values of mNGS, Xpert, and MGIT culture and assays were 94.26%, 98.29%, and 88.46%, respectively. The sensitivity of mNGS detection (85.11%) was similar to that of Xpert (95.74%) and higher than that of MGIT culture (68.08%). The specificities of mNGS detection, Xpert, and MGIT culture were both 100.00%. The area under the curve value of the mNGS assay was 0.895 (95% CI: 0.830, 0.960), which was greater than that of the MGIT culture-based assay of 0.840 (95% CI: 0.757, 0.924), which was similar to 0.979 (95% CI: 0.945, 1.000) for Xpert assay. The pathogen detection rate of mNGS in diagnosing suspected osteoarticular TB exceeded that of conventional methods.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>In the detection of unknown infectious disease pathogens, the overall efficacy of traditional detection methods, such as culture, is low, and traditional PCR testing is also limited to the gene sequences of known pathogenic microorganisms. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) performs DNA sequencing by studying the entire microbial community genome in a given sample, without the need for isolation and culture. Previous studies have shown that mNGS performs better on pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples when compared with Xpert, traditional pathogenetic tests, and even parallel diagnostics. However, it should be emphasized that only a few studies have explored the performance of mNGS in detecting <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> in clinical samples associated with bone and joint infections. We conducted this retrospective study to provide additional data to support the use of mNGS in the clinical setting to identify pathogens within abscesses or tissue samples associated with bone and joint infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metagenomic next-generation sequencing of osteoarticular tissue for the diagnosis of suspected osteoarticular tuberculosis.\",\"authors\":\"Guangxuan Yan, Zhifeng Liu, Tianlu Teng, Weijie Dong, Tinglong Lan, Jun Fan, Kai Tang, Shibing Qin, Wenjuan Nie\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/spectrum.03598-23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of the study is to determine the accuracy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing osteoarticular tuberculosis (TB) infection and to compare it with mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT) and Xpert assays. We retrospectively analyzed 162 patients admitted with suspected osteoarticular TB. Osteoarticular tissue (66.67%) and abscess specimens (33.33%) from patients were tested for MGIT, GeneXpert/RIF, and mNGS. mNGS assay detected 76 cases (46.9%) with bacterial, 63 cases (38.9%) with mycobacterial, 22 cases (13.6%) with fungal, and 1 case (0.6%) with actinomycetal organisms. These 162 pathogens were classified into 21 species. The most frequent species detected was <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex</i> (29.0%), followed by <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (20.4%), <i>Mycobacterium abscessus</i> (5.6%), and <i>Candida albicans</i> (5.6%). Taking the \\\"gold standard\\\" TB diagnosis as the standard, the positive predictive values of mNGS, Xpert, and MGIT culture were both 100.00%. The negative predictive values of mNGS, Xpert, and MGIT culture and assays were 94.26%, 98.29%, and 88.46%, respectively. The sensitivity of mNGS detection (85.11%) was similar to that of Xpert (95.74%) and higher than that of MGIT culture (68.08%). The specificities of mNGS detection, Xpert, and MGIT culture were both 100.00%. The area under the curve value of the mNGS assay was 0.895 (95% CI: 0.830, 0.960), which was greater than that of the MGIT culture-based assay of 0.840 (95% CI: 0.757, 0.924), which was similar to 0.979 (95% CI: 0.945, 1.000) for Xpert assay. The pathogen detection rate of mNGS in diagnosing suspected osteoarticular TB exceeded that of conventional methods.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>In the detection of unknown infectious disease pathogens, the overall efficacy of traditional detection methods, such as culture, is low, and traditional PCR testing is also limited to the gene sequences of known pathogenic microorganisms. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) performs DNA sequencing by studying the entire microbial community genome in a given sample, without the need for isolation and culture. Previous studies have shown that mNGS performs better on pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples when compared with Xpert, traditional pathogenetic tests, and even parallel diagnostics. However, it should be emphasized that only a few studies have explored the performance of mNGS in detecting <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> in clinical samples associated with bone and joint infections. We conducted this retrospective study to provide additional data to support the use of mNGS in the clinical setting to identify pathogens within abscesses or tissue samples associated with bone and joint infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.03598-23\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.03598-23","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定元基因组下一代测序(mNGS)诊断骨关节结核(TB)感染的准确性,并将其与分枝杆菌生长指示管(MGIT)和 Xpert 检测进行比较。我们对 162 名疑似骨关节结核患者进行了回顾性分析。通过 MGIT、GeneXpert/RIF 和 mNGS 检测了患者的骨关节组织(66.67%)和脓肿标本(33.33%)。mNGS 检测发现 76 例(46.9%)为细菌,63 例(38.9%)为分枝杆菌,22 例(13.6%)为真菌,1 例(0.6%)为放线菌。这 162 种病原体被分为 21 个物种。最常见的病原体是复合结核分枝杆菌(29.0%),其次是金黄色葡萄球菌(20.4%)、脓肿分枝杆菌(5.6%)和白色念珠菌(5.6%)。以结核病诊断的 "金标准 "为标准,mNGS、Xpert 和 MGIT 培养的阳性预测值均为 100.00%。mNGS、Xpert 和 MGIT 培养和检测的阴性预测值分别为 94.26%、98.29% 和 88.46%。mNGS 检测的灵敏度(85.11%)与 Xpert(95.74%)相似,高于 MGIT 培养(68.08%)。mNGS 检测、Xpert 和 MGIT 培养的特异性均为 100.00%。mNGS 检测的曲线下面积值为 0.895(95% CI:0.830,0.960),高于 MGIT 培养检测的 0.840(95% CI:0.757,0.924),与 Xpert 检测的 0.979(95% CI:0.945,1.000)相近。在诊断疑似骨关节结核时,mNGS 的病原体检出率超过了传统方法:在未知传染病病原体的检测中,培养等传统检测方法的总体效率较低,传统的 PCR 检测也仅限于已知病原微生物的基因序列。元基因组新一代测序(mNGS)通过研究给定样本中的整个微生物群落基因组进行 DNA 测序,无需分离和培养。以往的研究表明,与 Xpert、传统病原学检测甚至平行诊断相比,mNGS 在肺部和肺外样本中的表现更好。但需要强调的是,只有少数研究探讨了 mNGS 在检测与骨关节感染相关的临床样本中结核分枝杆菌的性能。我们进行了这项回顾性研究,旨在提供更多数据,支持在临床环境中使用 mNGS 识别与骨关节感染相关的脓肿或组织样本中的病原体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Metagenomic next-generation sequencing of osteoarticular tissue for the diagnosis of suspected osteoarticular tuberculosis.

The objective of the study is to determine the accuracy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing osteoarticular tuberculosis (TB) infection and to compare it with mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT) and Xpert assays. We retrospectively analyzed 162 patients admitted with suspected osteoarticular TB. Osteoarticular tissue (66.67%) and abscess specimens (33.33%) from patients were tested for MGIT, GeneXpert/RIF, and mNGS. mNGS assay detected 76 cases (46.9%) with bacterial, 63 cases (38.9%) with mycobacterial, 22 cases (13.6%) with fungal, and 1 case (0.6%) with actinomycetal organisms. These 162 pathogens were classified into 21 species. The most frequent species detected was Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (29.0%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (20.4%), Mycobacterium abscessus (5.6%), and Candida albicans (5.6%). Taking the "gold standard" TB diagnosis as the standard, the positive predictive values of mNGS, Xpert, and MGIT culture were both 100.00%. The negative predictive values of mNGS, Xpert, and MGIT culture and assays were 94.26%, 98.29%, and 88.46%, respectively. The sensitivity of mNGS detection (85.11%) was similar to that of Xpert (95.74%) and higher than that of MGIT culture (68.08%). The specificities of mNGS detection, Xpert, and MGIT culture were both 100.00%. The area under the curve value of the mNGS assay was 0.895 (95% CI: 0.830, 0.960), which was greater than that of the MGIT culture-based assay of 0.840 (95% CI: 0.757, 0.924), which was similar to 0.979 (95% CI: 0.945, 1.000) for Xpert assay. The pathogen detection rate of mNGS in diagnosing suspected osteoarticular TB exceeded that of conventional methods.

Importance: In the detection of unknown infectious disease pathogens, the overall efficacy of traditional detection methods, such as culture, is low, and traditional PCR testing is also limited to the gene sequences of known pathogenic microorganisms. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) performs DNA sequencing by studying the entire microbial community genome in a given sample, without the need for isolation and culture. Previous studies have shown that mNGS performs better on pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples when compared with Xpert, traditional pathogenetic tests, and even parallel diagnostics. However, it should be emphasized that only a few studies have explored the performance of mNGS in detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples associated with bone and joint infections. We conducted this retrospective study to provide additional data to support the use of mNGS in the clinical setting to identify pathogens within abscesses or tissue samples associated with bone and joint infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microbiology spectrum
Microbiology spectrum Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
1800
期刊介绍: Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信