童年时期的社区不利条件与 65 岁后核磁共振成像得出的大脑结构完整性。

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rachel L Peterson, Erika Meza, Kristen M George, Pauline Maillard, Charles DeCarli, Paola Gilsanz, Yenee Soh, Yi Lor, Amy J Kind, Lisa L Barnes, Rachel A Whitmer
{"title":"童年时期的社区不利条件与 65 岁后核磁共振成像得出的大脑结构完整性。","authors":"Rachel L Peterson, Erika Meza, Kristen M George, Pauline Maillard, Charles DeCarli, Paola Gilsanz, Yenee Soh, Yi Lor, Amy J Kind, Lisa L Barnes, Rachel A Whitmer","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Prior studies associate late-life community disadvantage with worse brain health. It is relatively unknown if childhood community disadvantage associates with late-life brain health.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test associations between childhood residence in an economically disadvantaged community, individual income and education, and late-life cortical brain volumes and white matter integrity.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study was conducted in the ongoing harmonized cohorts KHANDLE (Kaiser Healthy Aging and Diverse Life Experiences Study; initiated 2017) and STAR (Study of Healthy Aging in African Americans; initiated 2018) using all available data collected out of a regional integrated health care delivery network in California between cohort initiation and analysis initiation in June 2023. Eligible participants were Kaiser Permanente Northern California member ages 65 years or older. Data were analyzed between June and November 2023.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Residence at birth was geocoded and linked to historical Area Deprivation Indices (ADI). ADI is a nationally ranked percentile; community disadvantage was defined as ADI of 80 or higher.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Regional brain volumes and white matter integrity measures were derived from a random subset of participants who underwent 3T magnetic resonance imaging. Models adjusted for race and ethnicity, sex, and parental education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total 2161 individuals in the combined cohort, 443 individuals were eligible for imaging (mean [SD] age, 76.3 [6.5] years; 253 female [57.1%]; 56 Asian [12.6%], 212 Black [47.9%], 67 Latino [15.1%], 109 White [24.6%]). Imaging participants had a mean (SD) 15.0 (2.5) years of education, and 183 (41.3%) earned $55 000 to $99 999 annually. Fifty-four participants (12.2%) resided in a disadvantaged childhood community. Childhood community disadvantage was associated with smaller gray matter volumes overall (-0.39 cm3; 95% CI, -0.65 to -0.10 cm3) and in the cerebellum (-0.39 cm3; 95% CI, -0.66 to -0.09 cm3), hippocampus (-0.37 cm3; 95% CI, -0.68 to -0.04 cm3), and parietal cortex (-0.25 cm3; 95% CI, -0.46 to -0.04 cm3) and larger mean lateral ventricle (0.44 cm3; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.74 cm3), third ventricle (0.28 cm3; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.55 cm3), and white matter hyperintensity volume (0.31 cm3; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.56 cm3). Educational attainment and late-life income did not mediate these associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study of racially and ethnically diverse health plan members, childhood community disadvantage was associated with worse late-life brain health independent of individual socioeconomic status. Future work should explore alternative pathways (eg, cardiovascular health) that may explain observed associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2443703"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544493/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Childhood Community Disadvantage and MRI-Derived Structural Brain Integrity After Age 65 Years.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel L Peterson, Erika Meza, Kristen M George, Pauline Maillard, Charles DeCarli, Paola Gilsanz, Yenee Soh, Yi Lor, Amy J Kind, Lisa L Barnes, Rachel A Whitmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Prior studies associate late-life community disadvantage with worse brain health. It is relatively unknown if childhood community disadvantage associates with late-life brain health.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test associations between childhood residence in an economically disadvantaged community, individual income and education, and late-life cortical brain volumes and white matter integrity.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study was conducted in the ongoing harmonized cohorts KHANDLE (Kaiser Healthy Aging and Diverse Life Experiences Study; initiated 2017) and STAR (Study of Healthy Aging in African Americans; initiated 2018) using all available data collected out of a regional integrated health care delivery network in California between cohort initiation and analysis initiation in June 2023. Eligible participants were Kaiser Permanente Northern California member ages 65 years or older. Data were analyzed between June and November 2023.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Residence at birth was geocoded and linked to historical Area Deprivation Indices (ADI). ADI is a nationally ranked percentile; community disadvantage was defined as ADI of 80 or higher.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Regional brain volumes and white matter integrity measures were derived from a random subset of participants who underwent 3T magnetic resonance imaging. Models adjusted for race and ethnicity, sex, and parental education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total 2161 individuals in the combined cohort, 443 individuals were eligible for imaging (mean [SD] age, 76.3 [6.5] years; 253 female [57.1%]; 56 Asian [12.6%], 212 Black [47.9%], 67 Latino [15.1%], 109 White [24.6%]). Imaging participants had a mean (SD) 15.0 (2.5) years of education, and 183 (41.3%) earned $55 000 to $99 999 annually. Fifty-four participants (12.2%) resided in a disadvantaged childhood community. Childhood community disadvantage was associated with smaller gray matter volumes overall (-0.39 cm3; 95% CI, -0.65 to -0.10 cm3) and in the cerebellum (-0.39 cm3; 95% CI, -0.66 to -0.09 cm3), hippocampus (-0.37 cm3; 95% CI, -0.68 to -0.04 cm3), and parietal cortex (-0.25 cm3; 95% CI, -0.46 to -0.04 cm3) and larger mean lateral ventricle (0.44 cm3; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.74 cm3), third ventricle (0.28 cm3; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.55 cm3), and white matter hyperintensity volume (0.31 cm3; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.56 cm3). Educational attainment and late-life income did not mediate these associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study of racially and ethnically diverse health plan members, childhood community disadvantage was associated with worse late-life brain health independent of individual socioeconomic status. Future work should explore alternative pathways (eg, cardiovascular health) that may explain observed associations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"volume\":\"7 11\",\"pages\":\"e2443703\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544493/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43703\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43703","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:先前的研究表明,晚年的社区劣势与大脑健康状况有关。童年时期的社区劣势是否与晚年大脑健康有关,目前还相对未知:目的:检验童年时期居住在经济条件较差社区、个人收入和教育程度与晚年大脑皮质体积和白质完整性之间的关系:这项队列研究是在正在进行的协调队列 KHANDLE(凯撒健康老龄化和多样化生活经历研究;2017 年启动)和 STAR(非裔美国人健康老龄化研究;2018 年启动)中进行的,使用了从队列启动到 2023 年 6 月分析启动期间从加利福尼亚州一个地区性综合医疗保健服务网络收集到的所有可用数据。符合条件的参与者为北加州凯泽医疗集团 65 岁或以上的会员。数据分析时间为 2023 年 6 月至 11 月:出生时的居住地已进行地理编码,并与历史地区贫困指数 (ADI) 相关联。ADI 是全国排名的百分位数;ADI 为 80 或更高时,社区处境不利:区域脑容量和白质完整性指标来自接受 3T 磁共振成像的随机参与者子集。模型对种族、民族、性别和父母教育程度进行了调整:合并队列中共有 2161 人,其中 443 人符合成像条件(平均 [SD] 年龄为 76.3 [6.5] 岁;253 人为女性 [57.1%];56 人为亚裔 [12.6%];212 人为黑人 [47.9%];67 人为拉丁裔 [15.1%];109 人为白人 [24.6%])。造影参与者的平均受教育年限(标准差)为 15.0 (2.5)年,183 人(41.3%)的年收入在 55 000 美元至 99 999 美元之间。54名参与者(12.2%)居住在弱势儿童社区。童年社区的不利条件与灰质体积总体较小(-0.39 cm3; 95% CI, -0.65 to -0.10 cm3)以及小脑(-0.39 cm3; 95% CI, -0.66 to -0.09 cm3)、海马(-0.37 cm3; 95% CI, -0.68 to -0.04 cm3)和顶叶皮层(-0.25 cm3; 95% CI, -0.46 to -0.04 cm3),平均侧脑室(0.44 cm3; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.74 cm3)、第三脑室(0.28 cm3; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.55 cm3)和白质高密度体积(0.31 cm3; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.56 cm3)较大。教育程度和晚年收入并不影响这些关联:在这项针对不同种族和民族的健康计划成员的队列研究中,童年时期的社区不利条件与晚年大脑健康状况的恶化有关,而与个人的社会经济地位无关。未来的工作应探索可能解释观察到的关联的其他途径(如心血管健康)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Childhood Community Disadvantage and MRI-Derived Structural Brain Integrity After Age 65 Years.

Importance: Prior studies associate late-life community disadvantage with worse brain health. It is relatively unknown if childhood community disadvantage associates with late-life brain health.

Objective: To test associations between childhood residence in an economically disadvantaged community, individual income and education, and late-life cortical brain volumes and white matter integrity.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study was conducted in the ongoing harmonized cohorts KHANDLE (Kaiser Healthy Aging and Diverse Life Experiences Study; initiated 2017) and STAR (Study of Healthy Aging in African Americans; initiated 2018) using all available data collected out of a regional integrated health care delivery network in California between cohort initiation and analysis initiation in June 2023. Eligible participants were Kaiser Permanente Northern California member ages 65 years or older. Data were analyzed between June and November 2023.

Exposure: Residence at birth was geocoded and linked to historical Area Deprivation Indices (ADI). ADI is a nationally ranked percentile; community disadvantage was defined as ADI of 80 or higher.

Main outcomes and measures: Regional brain volumes and white matter integrity measures were derived from a random subset of participants who underwent 3T magnetic resonance imaging. Models adjusted for race and ethnicity, sex, and parental education.

Results: Of a total 2161 individuals in the combined cohort, 443 individuals were eligible for imaging (mean [SD] age, 76.3 [6.5] years; 253 female [57.1%]; 56 Asian [12.6%], 212 Black [47.9%], 67 Latino [15.1%], 109 White [24.6%]). Imaging participants had a mean (SD) 15.0 (2.5) years of education, and 183 (41.3%) earned $55 000 to $99 999 annually. Fifty-four participants (12.2%) resided in a disadvantaged childhood community. Childhood community disadvantage was associated with smaller gray matter volumes overall (-0.39 cm3; 95% CI, -0.65 to -0.10 cm3) and in the cerebellum (-0.39 cm3; 95% CI, -0.66 to -0.09 cm3), hippocampus (-0.37 cm3; 95% CI, -0.68 to -0.04 cm3), and parietal cortex (-0.25 cm3; 95% CI, -0.46 to -0.04 cm3) and larger mean lateral ventricle (0.44 cm3; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.74 cm3), third ventricle (0.28 cm3; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.55 cm3), and white matter hyperintensity volume (0.31 cm3; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.56 cm3). Educational attainment and late-life income did not mediate these associations.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of racially and ethnically diverse health plan members, childhood community disadvantage was associated with worse late-life brain health independent of individual socioeconomic status. Future work should explore alternative pathways (eg, cardiovascular health) that may explain observed associations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信