代谢组学结合转录组学和生理学揭示了大豆植物对干旱胁迫的调控响应。

IF 2.8 3区 生物学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Frontiers in Genetics Pub Date : 2024-10-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgene.2024.1458656
Liwei Wang, Peijin He, Mengmeng Hui, Hainan Li, Anni Sun, Hong Yin, Xining Gao
{"title":"代谢组学结合转录组学和生理学揭示了大豆植物对干旱胁迫的调控响应。","authors":"Liwei Wang, Peijin He, Mengmeng Hui, Hainan Li, Anni Sun, Hong Yin, Xining Gao","doi":"10.3389/fgene.2024.1458656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drought, a prevalent environmental stressor, has had significant consequences on soybean (<i>Glycine max</i> L.), notably impeding its growth and production. Therefore, it is crucial to gain insight into the regulatory responses of soybean plants exposed to drought stress during soybean flowering in the field. In this study, the cultivar 'Liaodou 15' was performed light drought (LD, 24.3% soil moisture content), moderate drought (MD, 20.6% soil moisture content) and severe drought (SD, 16.9% soil moisture content) treatments at flowering stages of soybean and then rehydrated (30% soil moisture content) until harvest. The yield-related indicators were measured and revealed that MD and SD treatments significantly reduced 6.3% and 10.8% of the 100-grain weight. Soybean plants subjected to three drought stresses showed that net photosynthetic rates were 20.8%, 51.5% and 71.8% lower in LD, MD and SD than that of CK. The WUE increased by 31.8%, 31.5% and 18.8% under three drought stress treatments compared to CK. In addition, proline content was 25.94%, 41.01% and 65.43% greater than that of CK under three drought stress treatments. The trend of the MDA content was consistent with that of the proline content. SOD activity was significantly increasing by 10.86%, 46.73% and 14.54% under three drought stress treatments. The activity of CAT in the SD treatment increased by 49.28%. All the indices recovered after rehydration. Furthermore, 54,78 and 51 different expressed metabolomics (DEMs) were identified in the LDCK/LD, MDCK/MD and SDCK/SD groups, respectively. There were 1,211, 1,265 and 1,288 different expressed genes (DEGs) were upregulated and 1,003, 1,819 and 1,747 DEGs were downregulated. Finally, combined transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis suggested that 437 DEGs and 24 DEMs of LDCK/LD group, 741 DEGs and 35 DEMs of MDCK/MD group, 633 DEGs and 23 DEMs of SDCK/SD group, were highly positively correlated in soybean plants under drought stress. Drought stress induced the expression of the <i>PAO1, PAO4, PAO5</i> and <i>P5CS</i> genes to promote the accumulation of spermidine and proline. Our study elucidates the responses of drought-stressed soybean plants in the field and provides a genetic basis for the breeding of drought-tolerant soybean plants.</p>","PeriodicalId":12750,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541050/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metabolomics combined with transcriptomics and physiology reveals the regulatory responses of soybean plants to drought stress.\",\"authors\":\"Liwei Wang, Peijin He, Mengmeng Hui, Hainan Li, Anni Sun, Hong Yin, Xining Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fgene.2024.1458656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Drought, a prevalent environmental stressor, has had significant consequences on soybean (<i>Glycine max</i> L.), notably impeding its growth and production. Therefore, it is crucial to gain insight into the regulatory responses of soybean plants exposed to drought stress during soybean flowering in the field. In this study, the cultivar 'Liaodou 15' was performed light drought (LD, 24.3% soil moisture content), moderate drought (MD, 20.6% soil moisture content) and severe drought (SD, 16.9% soil moisture content) treatments at flowering stages of soybean and then rehydrated (30% soil moisture content) until harvest. The yield-related indicators were measured and revealed that MD and SD treatments significantly reduced 6.3% and 10.8% of the 100-grain weight. Soybean plants subjected to three drought stresses showed that net photosynthetic rates were 20.8%, 51.5% and 71.8% lower in LD, MD and SD than that of CK. The WUE increased by 31.8%, 31.5% and 18.8% under three drought stress treatments compared to CK. In addition, proline content was 25.94%, 41.01% and 65.43% greater than that of CK under three drought stress treatments. The trend of the MDA content was consistent with that of the proline content. SOD activity was significantly increasing by 10.86%, 46.73% and 14.54% under three drought stress treatments. The activity of CAT in the SD treatment increased by 49.28%. All the indices recovered after rehydration. Furthermore, 54,78 and 51 different expressed metabolomics (DEMs) were identified in the LDCK/LD, MDCK/MD and SDCK/SD groups, respectively. There were 1,211, 1,265 and 1,288 different expressed genes (DEGs) were upregulated and 1,003, 1,819 and 1,747 DEGs were downregulated. Finally, combined transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis suggested that 437 DEGs and 24 DEMs of LDCK/LD group, 741 DEGs and 35 DEMs of MDCK/MD group, 633 DEGs and 23 DEMs of SDCK/SD group, were highly positively correlated in soybean plants under drought stress. Drought stress induced the expression of the <i>PAO1, PAO4, PAO5</i> and <i>P5CS</i> genes to promote the accumulation of spermidine and proline. Our study elucidates the responses of drought-stressed soybean plants in the field and provides a genetic basis for the breeding of drought-tolerant soybean plants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Genetics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541050/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2024.1458656\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2024.1458656","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

干旱是一种普遍存在的环境胁迫,对大豆(Glycine max L.)产生了重大影响,尤其是阻碍了其生长和产量。因此,深入了解大豆植株在田间大豆开花期间受到干旱胁迫时的调控反应至关重要。本研究在大豆开花期对栽培品种 "辽豆 15 号 "分别进行了轻度干旱(LD,土壤含水量 24.3%)、中度干旱(MD,土壤含水量 20.6%)和重度干旱(SD,土壤含水量 16.9%)处理,然后进行复水(土壤含水量 30%)直至收获。产量相关指标的测定结果表明,MD 和 SD 处理分别显著降低了 6.3% 和 10.8% 的百粒重。在三种干旱胁迫下,大豆植株的净光合速率在 LD、MD 和 SD 处理中分别比 CK 低 20.8%、51.5% 和 71.8%。与 CK 相比,三种干旱胁迫处理下的 WUE 分别增加了 31.8%、31.5% 和 18.8%。此外,在三种干旱胁迫处理下,脯氨酸含量分别比长江高 25.94%、41.01% 和 65.43%。MDA 含量的变化趋势与脯氨酸含量的变化趋势一致。在三种干旱胁迫处理下,SOD 活性明显提高了 10.86%、46.73% 和 14.54%。在 SD 处理中,CAT 的活性增加了 49.28%。补水后,所有指标均恢复正常。此外,在 LDCK/LD、MDCK/MD 和 SDCK/SD 组中分别发现了 54、78 和 51 种不同的表达代谢组学(DEMs)。分别有1211、1265和1288个不同表达基因(DEGs)被上调,1003、1819和1747个DEGs被下调。最后,结合转录组学和代谢组学分析表明,干旱胁迫下大豆植株的 LDCK/LD 组有 437 个 DEGs 和 24 个 DEMs、MDCK/MD 组有 741 个 DEGs 和 35 个 DEMs、SDCK/SD 组有 633 个 DEGs 和 23 个 DEMs 呈高度正相关。干旱胁迫诱导了 PAO1、PAO4、PAO5 和 P5CS 基因的表达,促进了精胺和脯氨酸的积累。我们的研究阐明了干旱胁迫大豆植株在田间的反应,为培育耐旱大豆植株提供了遗传基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Metabolomics combined with transcriptomics and physiology reveals the regulatory responses of soybean plants to drought stress.

Drought, a prevalent environmental stressor, has had significant consequences on soybean (Glycine max L.), notably impeding its growth and production. Therefore, it is crucial to gain insight into the regulatory responses of soybean plants exposed to drought stress during soybean flowering in the field. In this study, the cultivar 'Liaodou 15' was performed light drought (LD, 24.3% soil moisture content), moderate drought (MD, 20.6% soil moisture content) and severe drought (SD, 16.9% soil moisture content) treatments at flowering stages of soybean and then rehydrated (30% soil moisture content) until harvest. The yield-related indicators were measured and revealed that MD and SD treatments significantly reduced 6.3% and 10.8% of the 100-grain weight. Soybean plants subjected to three drought stresses showed that net photosynthetic rates were 20.8%, 51.5% and 71.8% lower in LD, MD and SD than that of CK. The WUE increased by 31.8%, 31.5% and 18.8% under three drought stress treatments compared to CK. In addition, proline content was 25.94%, 41.01% and 65.43% greater than that of CK under three drought stress treatments. The trend of the MDA content was consistent with that of the proline content. SOD activity was significantly increasing by 10.86%, 46.73% and 14.54% under three drought stress treatments. The activity of CAT in the SD treatment increased by 49.28%. All the indices recovered after rehydration. Furthermore, 54,78 and 51 different expressed metabolomics (DEMs) were identified in the LDCK/LD, MDCK/MD and SDCK/SD groups, respectively. There were 1,211, 1,265 and 1,288 different expressed genes (DEGs) were upregulated and 1,003, 1,819 and 1,747 DEGs were downregulated. Finally, combined transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis suggested that 437 DEGs and 24 DEMs of LDCK/LD group, 741 DEGs and 35 DEMs of MDCK/MD group, 633 DEGs and 23 DEMs of SDCK/SD group, were highly positively correlated in soybean plants under drought stress. Drought stress induced the expression of the PAO1, PAO4, PAO5 and P5CS genes to promote the accumulation of spermidine and proline. Our study elucidates the responses of drought-stressed soybean plants in the field and provides a genetic basis for the breeding of drought-tolerant soybean plants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Genetics
Frontiers in Genetics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
3491
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Genetics publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research on genes and genomes relating to all the domains of life, from humans to plants to livestock and other model organisms. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of the world’s leading experts, this multidisciplinary, open-access journal is at the forefront of communicating cutting-edge research to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public. The study of inheritance and the impact of the genome on various biological processes is well documented. However, the majority of discoveries are still to come. A new era is seeing major developments in the function and variability of the genome, the use of genetic and genomic tools and the analysis of the genetic basis of various biological phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信