连接公共卫生研究与州一级政策:德克萨斯州研究到政策合作项目。

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Deanna M Hoelscher, Alexandra van den Berg, Amelia Roebuck, Shelby Flores-Thorpe, Kathleen Manuel, Tiffni Menendez, Christine Jovanovic, Aliya Hussaini, John T Menchaca, Elizabeth Long, D Max Crowley, J Taylor Scott
{"title":"连接公共卫生研究与州一级政策:德克萨斯州研究到政策合作项目。","authors":"Deanna M Hoelscher, Alexandra van den Berg, Amelia Roebuck, Shelby Flores-Thorpe, Kathleen Manuel, Tiffni Menendez, Christine Jovanovic, Aliya Hussaini, John T Menchaca, Elizabeth Long, D Max Crowley, J Taylor Scott","doi":"10.5888/pcd21.240171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose and objectives: </strong>Significant barriers to the implementation of evidence-based policy exist. Establishing an infrastructure and resources to support this process at the state level can accelerate the translation of research into practice. This study describes the adaptation and initial evaluation of the Texas Research-to-Policy Collaboration (TX RPC) Project, focusing on the adaptation process, legislative public health policy priorities, and baseline researcher policy knowledge and self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Intervention approach: </strong>The federal Research-to-Policy Collaboration (RPC) method was adapted to the Texas legislative process in 2020. Policymakers and public health researchers were recruited using direct outreach and referrals. Legislators or their aides were interviewed to determine health policy needs, which directed the development of legislator resources, webinars, and recruitment of additional public health researchers with specific expertise. Researchers were trained to facilitate communication with policymakers, and TX RPC Project staff facilitated legislator and researcher meetings to provide data and policy input.</p><p><strong>Evaluation methods: </strong>Baseline surveys were completed with legislators to assess the use of health researchers in policy. Surveys were also administered before training to researchers assessing self-efficacy, knowledge, and training needs. Qualitative data from the legislator interviews were analyzed using inductive and deductive approaches. Quantitative survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics for scales and individual survey items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Legislative offices (n = 21) identified health care access, mental health, and health disparities as key health issues. Legislators reported that health data were important but did not actively involve researchers in legislation. Researchers (n = 73) reported that policy informed their work but had low engagement with legislators. Researcher training surveys indicated lower policy self-efficacy and knowledge and the need for additional training.</p><p><strong>Implications for public health: </strong>Adaptation of the RPC model for state-level health policy is feasible but necessitates logistical changes based on the unique legislative body. Researchers need training and resources to engage with policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":51273,"journal":{"name":"Preventing Chronic Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"E87"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging Public Health Research and State-Level Policy: The Texas Research-to-Policy Collaboration Project.\",\"authors\":\"Deanna M Hoelscher, Alexandra van den Berg, Amelia Roebuck, Shelby Flores-Thorpe, Kathleen Manuel, Tiffni Menendez, Christine Jovanovic, Aliya Hussaini, John T Menchaca, Elizabeth Long, D Max Crowley, J Taylor Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.5888/pcd21.240171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose and objectives: </strong>Significant barriers to the implementation of evidence-based policy exist. Establishing an infrastructure and resources to support this process at the state level can accelerate the translation of research into practice. This study describes the adaptation and initial evaluation of the Texas Research-to-Policy Collaboration (TX RPC) Project, focusing on the adaptation process, legislative public health policy priorities, and baseline researcher policy knowledge and self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Intervention approach: </strong>The federal Research-to-Policy Collaboration (RPC) method was adapted to the Texas legislative process in 2020. Policymakers and public health researchers were recruited using direct outreach and referrals. Legislators or their aides were interviewed to determine health policy needs, which directed the development of legislator resources, webinars, and recruitment of additional public health researchers with specific expertise. Researchers were trained to facilitate communication with policymakers, and TX RPC Project staff facilitated legislator and researcher meetings to provide data and policy input.</p><p><strong>Evaluation methods: </strong>Baseline surveys were completed with legislators to assess the use of health researchers in policy. Surveys were also administered before training to researchers assessing self-efficacy, knowledge, and training needs. Qualitative data from the legislator interviews were analyzed using inductive and deductive approaches. Quantitative survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics for scales and individual survey items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Legislative offices (n = 21) identified health care access, mental health, and health disparities as key health issues. Legislators reported that health data were important but did not actively involve researchers in legislation. Researchers (n = 73) reported that policy informed their work but had low engagement with legislators. Researcher training surveys indicated lower policy self-efficacy and knowledge and the need for additional training.</p><p><strong>Implications for public health: </strong>Adaptation of the RPC model for state-level health policy is feasible but necessitates logistical changes based on the unique legislative body. Researchers need training and resources to engage with policymakers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventing Chronic Disease\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"E87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567515/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventing Chronic Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd21.240171\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventing Chronic Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd21.240171","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的和目标:实施循证政策存在重大障碍。在州一级建立支持这一过程的基础设施和资源,可以加快将研究成果转化为实践。本研究描述了德克萨斯州研究到政策协作(Texas Research-to-Policy Collaboration,TX RPC)项目的调整和初步评估,重点关注调整过程、立法公共卫生政策优先事项以及研究人员的政策知识和自我效能基线:干预方法:2020 年,联邦研究到政策合作(RPC)方法被调整到德克萨斯州的立法程序中。通过直接外联和转介招募了政策制定者和公共卫生研究人员。对立法者或其助手进行访谈,以确定卫生政策需求,从而指导立法者资源的开发、网络研讨会以及招募更多具有特定专业知识的公共卫生研究人员。研究人员接受了促进与政策制定者沟通的培训,德克萨斯州 RPC 项目工作人员为立法者和研究人员会议提供便利,以提供数据和政策意见:与立法者一起完成了基线调查,以评估卫生研究人员在政策中的使用情况。在对研究人员进行培训之前,还对其进行了调查,以评估其自我效能、知识和培训需求。立法者访谈的定性数据采用归纳和演绎的方法进行分析。定量调查数据则采用描述性统计方法对量表和单个调查项目进行分析:立法办公室(n = 21)将医疗保健的获取、心理健康和健康差异确定为主要的健康问题。立法者称健康数据很重要,但并没有积极地让研究人员参与立法。研究人员(n = 73)表示,政策为他们的工作提供了信息,但与立法者的接触较少。研究人员培训调查显示,政策自我效能和知识水平较低,需要额外培训:将 RPC 模式应用于州级卫生政策是可行的,但需要根据独特的立法机构进行后勤方面的调整。研究人员需要培训和资源,以便与政策制定者接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging Public Health Research and State-Level Policy: The Texas Research-to-Policy Collaboration Project.

Purpose and objectives: Significant barriers to the implementation of evidence-based policy exist. Establishing an infrastructure and resources to support this process at the state level can accelerate the translation of research into practice. This study describes the adaptation and initial evaluation of the Texas Research-to-Policy Collaboration (TX RPC) Project, focusing on the adaptation process, legislative public health policy priorities, and baseline researcher policy knowledge and self-efficacy.

Intervention approach: The federal Research-to-Policy Collaboration (RPC) method was adapted to the Texas legislative process in 2020. Policymakers and public health researchers were recruited using direct outreach and referrals. Legislators or their aides were interviewed to determine health policy needs, which directed the development of legislator resources, webinars, and recruitment of additional public health researchers with specific expertise. Researchers were trained to facilitate communication with policymakers, and TX RPC Project staff facilitated legislator and researcher meetings to provide data and policy input.

Evaluation methods: Baseline surveys were completed with legislators to assess the use of health researchers in policy. Surveys were also administered before training to researchers assessing self-efficacy, knowledge, and training needs. Qualitative data from the legislator interviews were analyzed using inductive and deductive approaches. Quantitative survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics for scales and individual survey items.

Results: Legislative offices (n = 21) identified health care access, mental health, and health disparities as key health issues. Legislators reported that health data were important but did not actively involve researchers in legislation. Researchers (n = 73) reported that policy informed their work but had low engagement with legislators. Researcher training surveys indicated lower policy self-efficacy and knowledge and the need for additional training.

Implications for public health: Adaptation of the RPC model for state-level health policy is feasible but necessitates logistical changes based on the unique legislative body. Researchers need training and resources to engage with policymakers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Preventing Chronic Disease
Preventing Chronic Disease PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Preventing Chronic Disease (PCD) is a peer-reviewed electronic journal established by the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. The mission of PCD is to promote the open exchange of information and knowledge among researchers, practitioners, policy makers, and others who strive to improve the health of the public through chronic disease prevention. The vision of PCD is to be the premier forum where practitioners and policy makers inform research and researchers help practitioners and policy makers more effectively improve the health of the population. Articles focus on preventing and controlling chronic diseases and conditions, promoting health, and examining the biological, behavioral, physical, and social determinants of health and their impact on quality of life, morbidity, and mortality across the life span.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信