在医院急诊环境中,对中性粒细胞的体积、电导率和散射(VCS)指数诊断败血症的准确性进行分析观察研究。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Anandita Bharti, Anshu Palta, Ravneet Kaur Bedi, Sanjay D Cruz
{"title":"在医院急诊环境中,对中性粒细胞的体积、电导率和散射(VCS)指数诊断败血症的准确性进行分析观察研究。","authors":"Anandita Bharti, Anshu Palta, Ravneet Kaur Bedi, Sanjay D Cruz","doi":"10.25259/ijmr_1898_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background & objectives The newer technique using an innovative volume conductivity scatter (VCS) technology is emerging as a surrogate for sepsis diagnosis. The VCS technology offers a more objective method to measure cell volume (V), characterize conductivity (C) and light scatter (S) directly from more than 8,000 white blood cells (WBCs). However, diagnostic performance of VCS parameters in sepsis has not been extensively tested in routine hospital emergency settings. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of VCS markers of neutrophils in our local hospital emergency setting. Methods It was an observational analytical study with 41 cases of sepsis and 43 healthy controls aged above 18 yr. Individuals with acute coronary syndrome and individuals with already diagnosed Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection were excluded from the study. Results The mean neutrophil volume (MNV) values were not significantly different between cases and controls (P 0.138) whereas mean neutrophil conductance (MNC) and mean neutrophil scatter (MNS) measurements were significantly higher among cases as compared to controls (both P-values <0.001). According to Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROCs) curve analysis, MNV in our study failed to show statistically significant discriminatory ability in sepsis (AUC 0.54) whereas MNC (AUC 0.98) and MNS (AUC 0.95) showed marked discriminatory ability in diagnosing sepsis in this study cohort. Interpretation & conclusions Among VCS parameters, MNV failed as a standalone biomarker of sepsis in routine emergency setting whereas MNC and MNS had statistically significant diagnostic and discriminatory accuracies among hospitalized affected individuals with sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13349,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","volume":"160 2","pages":"179-185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An analytical observational study for diagnostic accuracy of volume, conductivity & scatter (VCS) indices of neutrophils for diagnosis of sepsis in an emergency hospital setting.\",\"authors\":\"Anandita Bharti, Anshu Palta, Ravneet Kaur Bedi, Sanjay D Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/ijmr_1898_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background & objectives The newer technique using an innovative volume conductivity scatter (VCS) technology is emerging as a surrogate for sepsis diagnosis. The VCS technology offers a more objective method to measure cell volume (V), characterize conductivity (C) and light scatter (S) directly from more than 8,000 white blood cells (WBCs). However, diagnostic performance of VCS parameters in sepsis has not been extensively tested in routine hospital emergency settings. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of VCS markers of neutrophils in our local hospital emergency setting. Methods It was an observational analytical study with 41 cases of sepsis and 43 healthy controls aged above 18 yr. Individuals with acute coronary syndrome and individuals with already diagnosed Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection were excluded from the study. Results The mean neutrophil volume (MNV) values were not significantly different between cases and controls (P 0.138) whereas mean neutrophil conductance (MNC) and mean neutrophil scatter (MNS) measurements were significantly higher among cases as compared to controls (both P-values <0.001). According to Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROCs) curve analysis, MNV in our study failed to show statistically significant discriminatory ability in sepsis (AUC 0.54) whereas MNC (AUC 0.98) and MNS (AUC 0.95) showed marked discriminatory ability in diagnosing sepsis in this study cohort. Interpretation & conclusions Among VCS parameters, MNV failed as a standalone biomarker of sepsis in routine emergency setting whereas MNC and MNS had statistically significant diagnostic and discriminatory accuracies among hospitalized affected individuals with sepsis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"160 2\",\"pages\":\"179-185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544566/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijmr_1898_23\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijmr_1898_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的 采用创新性体积传导散射(VCS)技术的较新技术正在成为败血症诊断的替代方法。VCS 技术提供了一种更客观的方法,可直接测量 8000 多个白细胞(WBC)的细胞体积(V)、电导率(C)和光散射(S)。然而,脓毒症中 VCS 参数的诊断性能尚未在常规医院急诊环境中得到广泛测试。因此,本研究旨在调查中性粒细胞 VCS 指标在本地医院急诊环境中的诊断和预后性能。研究排除了急性冠脉综合征患者和已确诊的人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染者。结果 病例和对照组的平均中性粒细胞体积(MNV)值无明显差异(P 0.138),而病例的平均中性粒细胞传导性(MNC)和平均中性粒细胞散射(MNS)测量值则明显高于对照组(P 值均为 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An analytical observational study for diagnostic accuracy of volume, conductivity & scatter (VCS) indices of neutrophils for diagnosis of sepsis in an emergency hospital setting.

Background & objectives The newer technique using an innovative volume conductivity scatter (VCS) technology is emerging as a surrogate for sepsis diagnosis. The VCS technology offers a more objective method to measure cell volume (V), characterize conductivity (C) and light scatter (S) directly from more than 8,000 white blood cells (WBCs). However, diagnostic performance of VCS parameters in sepsis has not been extensively tested in routine hospital emergency settings. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of VCS markers of neutrophils in our local hospital emergency setting. Methods It was an observational analytical study with 41 cases of sepsis and 43 healthy controls aged above 18 yr. Individuals with acute coronary syndrome and individuals with already diagnosed Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection were excluded from the study. Results The mean neutrophil volume (MNV) values were not significantly different between cases and controls (P 0.138) whereas mean neutrophil conductance (MNC) and mean neutrophil scatter (MNS) measurements were significantly higher among cases as compared to controls (both P-values <0.001). According to Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROCs) curve analysis, MNV in our study failed to show statistically significant discriminatory ability in sepsis (AUC 0.54) whereas MNC (AUC 0.98) and MNS (AUC 0.95) showed marked discriminatory ability in diagnosing sepsis in this study cohort. Interpretation & conclusions Among VCS parameters, MNV failed as a standalone biomarker of sepsis in routine emergency setting whereas MNC and MNS had statistically significant diagnostic and discriminatory accuracies among hospitalized affected individuals with sepsis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
191
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Medical Research (IJMR) [ISSN 0971-5916] is one of the oldest medical Journals not only in India, but probably in Asia, as it started in the year 1913. The Journal was started as a quarterly (4 issues/year) in 1913 and made bimonthly (6 issues/year) in 1958. It became monthly (12 issues/year) in the year 1964.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信