{"title":"氯胺酮对脑外伤患者的临床疗效:系统综述。","authors":"Mohammad Sameer, Duaa Al Abbas","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_36_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current literature provides contradictory results concerning the impact of ketamine-induced anesthesia on traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the potential of ketamine boluses to influence the brain pathophysiology in TBI patients. Twenty-one studies (n = 886) were extracted from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. The primary endpoints included intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). The secondary endpoints were mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), electroencephalography (EEG), mean cerebral blood flow velocity, jugular oxygen saturation, ventilation, neurological outcomes, mortality, and overall efficacy and side-effects of ketamine-induced anesthesia. Four studies indicated a statistically significant decline in ICP in TBI patients, with ketamine sedation. Contrastingly, two studies revealed statistically significant ICP elevations, after ketamine-induced anesthesia, in TBI patients. Five studies negated any correlation between ketamine dosages and ICP changes. Three studies indicated a statistically significant increase in CPP after ketamine-induced anesthesia in TBI patients. One study revealed CPP decline after the administration of ketamine-midazolam treatment to TBI patients. Five studies revealed no noticeable influence of ketamine bolus on CPP in TBI patients. Similarly, inconsistent variations were observed in most of the secondary endpoints, including electroencephalography, neurologic outcomes, and ketamine-related side effects (all P <0.05). This systematic review emphasizes the role of ketamine-induced anesthesia in inconsistently improving or deteriorating clinical outcomes in patients with TBI. Future studies should evaluate the predominant causes (i.e., factors and attributes) of ketamine-related clinical outcomes in the TBI setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"14 3","pages":"160-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes of ketamine in patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Sameer, Duaa Al Abbas\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_36_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The current literature provides contradictory results concerning the impact of ketamine-induced anesthesia on traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the potential of ketamine boluses to influence the brain pathophysiology in TBI patients. Twenty-one studies (n = 886) were extracted from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. The primary endpoints included intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). The secondary endpoints were mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), electroencephalography (EEG), mean cerebral blood flow velocity, jugular oxygen saturation, ventilation, neurological outcomes, mortality, and overall efficacy and side-effects of ketamine-induced anesthesia. Four studies indicated a statistically significant decline in ICP in TBI patients, with ketamine sedation. Contrastingly, two studies revealed statistically significant ICP elevations, after ketamine-induced anesthesia, in TBI patients. Five studies negated any correlation between ketamine dosages and ICP changes. Three studies indicated a statistically significant increase in CPP after ketamine-induced anesthesia in TBI patients. One study revealed CPP decline after the administration of ketamine-midazolam treatment to TBI patients. Five studies revealed no noticeable influence of ketamine bolus on CPP in TBI patients. Similarly, inconsistent variations were observed in most of the secondary endpoints, including electroencephalography, neurologic outcomes, and ketamine-related side effects (all P <0.05). This systematic review emphasizes the role of ketamine-induced anesthesia in inconsistently improving or deteriorating clinical outcomes in patients with TBI. Future studies should evaluate the predominant causes (i.e., factors and attributes) of ketamine-related clinical outcomes in the TBI setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"160-175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540192/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_36_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_36_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical outcomes of ketamine in patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review.
The current literature provides contradictory results concerning the impact of ketamine-induced anesthesia on traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the potential of ketamine boluses to influence the brain pathophysiology in TBI patients. Twenty-one studies (n = 886) were extracted from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. The primary endpoints included intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). The secondary endpoints were mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), electroencephalography (EEG), mean cerebral blood flow velocity, jugular oxygen saturation, ventilation, neurological outcomes, mortality, and overall efficacy and side-effects of ketamine-induced anesthesia. Four studies indicated a statistically significant decline in ICP in TBI patients, with ketamine sedation. Contrastingly, two studies revealed statistically significant ICP elevations, after ketamine-induced anesthesia, in TBI patients. Five studies negated any correlation between ketamine dosages and ICP changes. Three studies indicated a statistically significant increase in CPP after ketamine-induced anesthesia in TBI patients. One study revealed CPP decline after the administration of ketamine-midazolam treatment to TBI patients. Five studies revealed no noticeable influence of ketamine bolus on CPP in TBI patients. Similarly, inconsistent variations were observed in most of the secondary endpoints, including electroencephalography, neurologic outcomes, and ketamine-related side effects (all P <0.05). This systematic review emphasizes the role of ketamine-induced anesthesia in inconsistently improving or deteriorating clinical outcomes in patients with TBI. Future studies should evaluate the predominant causes (i.e., factors and attributes) of ketamine-related clinical outcomes in the TBI setting.
期刊介绍:
IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.