抗生素药物可能持续存在的味觉、嗅觉和听觉药物不良反应信号:利用 EudraVigilance 数据库进行的比例失调分析。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sara Ferraro, Emiliano Cappello, Marco Fornili, Irma Convertino, Marco Bonaso, Ersilia Lucenteforte, Marco Tuccori
{"title":"抗生素药物可能持续存在的味觉、嗅觉和听觉药物不良反应信号:利用 EudraVigilance 数据库进行的比例失调分析。","authors":"Sara Ferraro, Emiliano Cappello, Marco Fornili, Irma Convertino, Marco Bonaso, Ersilia Lucenteforte, Marco Tuccori","doi":"10.1007/s40264-024-01491-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2018, the European Medicines Agency issued some risk minimisation measures related to unresolved adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported for fluoroquinolones, including sensory ADRs. Spontaneous reporting databases frequently report unresolved outcomes for gustatory, olfactory and auditory (GOA) ADRs. However, such a high volume of unresolved GOA ADRs could reflect an under-investigated clinical issue or an intrinsic difficulty in the outcome assessment.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of the study were: (1) to investigate whether unresolved outcomes are reported more frequently for GOA ADRs than for other ADRs to systemic antibiotics and (2) to identify possible signals of unresolved GOA ADRs for systemic antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the EudraVigilance database to extract the number of ADRs to systemic antibiotics of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical class J01 up to February 2019. We classified ADRs in \"non-GOA ADRs\" and \"GOA ADRs\". Adverse drug reactions were categorised in three groups according to the outcome: defined, persistent/permanent (unresolved) and undetermined ADRs. We performed disproportionality analyses with the case/non-case methodology, by calculating the crude reporting odds ratio (ROR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Cases were all persistent/permanent ADRs, and non-cases were defined and undetermined ADRs. For the first objective, index groups were gustatory or olfactory or auditory ADRs, while reference group included all non-GOA ADRs. For the second objective, we performed a disproportionality analysis by using the sub-set of GOA ADRs. Index and reference groups varied with subgroups of drugs and drug class, so that each drug and drug class was compared with the others. We conducted two sensitivity analyses for each analysis by varying the case definition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We extracted 748,798 ADRs, including 10,770 GOA ADRs. The first analysis showed that GOA ADRs were reported more frequently as unresolved events compared with all other ADRs (ROR: 2.68 95% CI 2.51-2.85; ROR: 5.20 95% CI 4.66-5.81; and ROR: 2.64 (95% CI 2.51-2.79, respectively). Gustatory ADRs were reported more frequently as unresolved for doxycycline (ROR: 1.69, 95% CI 1.18-2.41, p = 0.0038), azithromycin (ROR: 2.07, 95% CI 1.58-2.72, p < 0.0001) and levofloxacin (ROR: 1.59, 95% CI 1.22-2.07, p < 0.001) compared with GOA ADRs of all other antibiotics. Olfactory ADRs were reported more frequently as unresolved for doxycycline (ROR: 2.4, 95% CI 1.26-4.58, p = 0.0078) and levofloxacin (ROR: 1.92, 95% CI 1.28-2.86, p = 0.0014). Auditory ADRs were reported more frequently as unresolved for doxycycline (ROR: 1.52, 95% CI 1.09-2.12, p = 0.013) and clarithromycin (ROR: 1.31, 95% CI 1.09-1.59, p = 0.0049).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We tested and used an appropriate expected frequency standard, which allows us to identify possible signals of unresolved GOA ADRs to antibiotic drugs in the EudraVigilance database. This approach could be used to generate signals of persistent or even irreversible events for other drugs or adverse reactions. However, these signals must be confirmed with a thorough clinical assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11382,"journal":{"name":"Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Signals of Possibly Persistent Gustatory, Olfactory and Auditory Adverse Drug Reactions to Antibiotic Drugs: A Disproportionality Analysis Using the EudraVigilance Database.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Ferraro, Emiliano Cappello, Marco Fornili, Irma Convertino, Marco Bonaso, Ersilia Lucenteforte, Marco Tuccori\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40264-024-01491-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2018, the European Medicines Agency issued some risk minimisation measures related to unresolved adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported for fluoroquinolones, including sensory ADRs. Spontaneous reporting databases frequently report unresolved outcomes for gustatory, olfactory and auditory (GOA) ADRs. However, such a high volume of unresolved GOA ADRs could reflect an under-investigated clinical issue or an intrinsic difficulty in the outcome assessment.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of the study were: (1) to investigate whether unresolved outcomes are reported more frequently for GOA ADRs than for other ADRs to systemic antibiotics and (2) to identify possible signals of unresolved GOA ADRs for systemic antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the EudraVigilance database to extract the number of ADRs to systemic antibiotics of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical class J01 up to February 2019. We classified ADRs in \\\"non-GOA ADRs\\\" and \\\"GOA ADRs\\\". Adverse drug reactions were categorised in three groups according to the outcome: defined, persistent/permanent (unresolved) and undetermined ADRs. We performed disproportionality analyses with the case/non-case methodology, by calculating the crude reporting odds ratio (ROR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Cases were all persistent/permanent ADRs, and non-cases were defined and undetermined ADRs. For the first objective, index groups were gustatory or olfactory or auditory ADRs, while reference group included all non-GOA ADRs. For the second objective, we performed a disproportionality analysis by using the sub-set of GOA ADRs. Index and reference groups varied with subgroups of drugs and drug class, so that each drug and drug class was compared with the others. We conducted two sensitivity analyses for each analysis by varying the case definition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We extracted 748,798 ADRs, including 10,770 GOA ADRs. The first analysis showed that GOA ADRs were reported more frequently as unresolved events compared with all other ADRs (ROR: 2.68 95% CI 2.51-2.85; ROR: 5.20 95% CI 4.66-5.81; and ROR: 2.64 (95% CI 2.51-2.79, respectively). Gustatory ADRs were reported more frequently as unresolved for doxycycline (ROR: 1.69, 95% CI 1.18-2.41, p = 0.0038), azithromycin (ROR: 2.07, 95% CI 1.58-2.72, p < 0.0001) and levofloxacin (ROR: 1.59, 95% CI 1.22-2.07, p < 0.001) compared with GOA ADRs of all other antibiotics. Olfactory ADRs were reported more frequently as unresolved for doxycycline (ROR: 2.4, 95% CI 1.26-4.58, p = 0.0078) and levofloxacin (ROR: 1.92, 95% CI 1.28-2.86, p = 0.0014). Auditory ADRs were reported more frequently as unresolved for doxycycline (ROR: 1.52, 95% CI 1.09-2.12, p = 0.013) and clarithromycin (ROR: 1.31, 95% CI 1.09-1.59, p = 0.0049).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We tested and used an appropriate expected frequency standard, which allows us to identify possible signals of unresolved GOA ADRs to antibiotic drugs in the EudraVigilance database. This approach could be used to generate signals of persistent or even irreversible events for other drugs or adverse reactions. However, these signals must be confirmed with a thorough clinical assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-024-01491-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-024-01491-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2018 年,欧洲药品管理局发布了一些与氟喹诺酮类药物(包括感官 ADR)报告的未解决药物不良反应(ADR)相关的风险最小化措施。自发报告数据库经常报告未解决的味觉、嗅觉和听觉(GOA)ADR 结果。然而,大量未解决的味觉、嗅觉和听觉不良反应可能反映出临床问题未得到充分调查或结果评估存在内在困难:本研究的目的是研究目的:(1)调查与全身用抗生素的其他不良反应相比,GOA ADR 的未解决结果报告是否更频繁;(2)确定全身用抗生素的 GOA ADR 未解决的可能信号:我们使用 EudraVigilance 数据库提取了截至 2019 年 2 月的解剖治疗化学类 J01 全身用抗生素的 ADR 数量。我们将ADR分为 "非GOA ADR "和 "GOA ADR"。药物不良反应根据结果分为三类:已确定、持续/永久(未解决)和未确定的 ADR。我们采用病例/非病例方法进行了比例失调分析,计算了粗报告几率比(ROR)和 95% 置信区间(CI)。病例是指所有持续性/永久性 ADR,非病例是指已确定和未确定的 ADR。在第一个目标中,指标组为味觉、嗅觉或听觉 ADR,参照组包括所有非 GOA ADR。对于第二个目标,我们使用全球海洋观测系统 ADR 子集进行了比例失调分析。指数组和参照组随着药物和药物类别的分组而变化,因此每种药物和药物类别都与其他药物和药物类别进行了比较。通过改变病例定义,我们对每项分析进行了两次敏感性分析:我们提取了 748,798 例 ADR,其中包括 10,770 例 GOA ADR。第一项分析表明,与所有其他 ADR 相比,GOA ADR 作为未解决事件报告的频率更高(ROR:2.68 95% CI 2.51-2.85;ROR:5.20 95% CI 4.66-5.81;ROR:2.64 (95% CI 2.51-2.79,分别为 2.68、5.20 和 2.64)。与所有其他抗生素的GOA ADR相比,多西环素(ROR:1.69,95% CI 1.18-2.41,p = 0.0038)、阿奇霉素(ROR:2.07,95% CI 1.58-2.72,p < 0.0001)和左氧氟沙星(ROR:1.59,95% CI 1.22-2.07,p < 0.001)的口腔ADR未解决的报告频率更高。多西环素(ROR:2.4,95% CI 1.26-4.58,p = 0.0078)和左氧氟沙星(ROR:1.92,95% CI 1.28-2.86,p = 0.0014)的嗅觉 ADR 更常被报告为未解决。多西环素(ROR:1.52,95% CI 1.09-2.12,p = 0.013)和克拉霉素(ROR:1.31,95% CI 1.09-1.59,p = 0.0049)的听觉 ADR 更常被报告为未解决:我们测试并使用了一种适当的预期频率标准,该标准使我们能够识别 EudraVigilance 数据库中可能存在的抗生素药物未解决的 GOA ADR 信号。这种方法可用于生成其他药物或不良反应的持续性甚至不可逆事件信号。不过,这些信号必须通过全面的临床评估加以确认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Signals of Possibly Persistent Gustatory, Olfactory and Auditory Adverse Drug Reactions to Antibiotic Drugs: A Disproportionality Analysis Using the EudraVigilance Database.

Background: In 2018, the European Medicines Agency issued some risk minimisation measures related to unresolved adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported for fluoroquinolones, including sensory ADRs. Spontaneous reporting databases frequently report unresolved outcomes for gustatory, olfactory and auditory (GOA) ADRs. However, such a high volume of unresolved GOA ADRs could reflect an under-investigated clinical issue or an intrinsic difficulty in the outcome assessment.

Objectives: The objectives of the study were: (1) to investigate whether unresolved outcomes are reported more frequently for GOA ADRs than for other ADRs to systemic antibiotics and (2) to identify possible signals of unresolved GOA ADRs for systemic antibiotics.

Methods: We used the EudraVigilance database to extract the number of ADRs to systemic antibiotics of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical class J01 up to February 2019. We classified ADRs in "non-GOA ADRs" and "GOA ADRs". Adverse drug reactions were categorised in three groups according to the outcome: defined, persistent/permanent (unresolved) and undetermined ADRs. We performed disproportionality analyses with the case/non-case methodology, by calculating the crude reporting odds ratio (ROR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Cases were all persistent/permanent ADRs, and non-cases were defined and undetermined ADRs. For the first objective, index groups were gustatory or olfactory or auditory ADRs, while reference group included all non-GOA ADRs. For the second objective, we performed a disproportionality analysis by using the sub-set of GOA ADRs. Index and reference groups varied with subgroups of drugs and drug class, so that each drug and drug class was compared with the others. We conducted two sensitivity analyses for each analysis by varying the case definition.

Results: We extracted 748,798 ADRs, including 10,770 GOA ADRs. The first analysis showed that GOA ADRs were reported more frequently as unresolved events compared with all other ADRs (ROR: 2.68 95% CI 2.51-2.85; ROR: 5.20 95% CI 4.66-5.81; and ROR: 2.64 (95% CI 2.51-2.79, respectively). Gustatory ADRs were reported more frequently as unresolved for doxycycline (ROR: 1.69, 95% CI 1.18-2.41, p = 0.0038), azithromycin (ROR: 2.07, 95% CI 1.58-2.72, p < 0.0001) and levofloxacin (ROR: 1.59, 95% CI 1.22-2.07, p < 0.001) compared with GOA ADRs of all other antibiotics. Olfactory ADRs were reported more frequently as unresolved for doxycycline (ROR: 2.4, 95% CI 1.26-4.58, p = 0.0078) and levofloxacin (ROR: 1.92, 95% CI 1.28-2.86, p = 0.0014). Auditory ADRs were reported more frequently as unresolved for doxycycline (ROR: 1.52, 95% CI 1.09-2.12, p = 0.013) and clarithromycin (ROR: 1.31, 95% CI 1.09-1.59, p = 0.0049).

Conclusions: We tested and used an appropriate expected frequency standard, which allows us to identify possible signals of unresolved GOA ADRs to antibiotic drugs in the EudraVigilance database. This approach could be used to generate signals of persistent or even irreversible events for other drugs or adverse reactions. However, these signals must be confirmed with a thorough clinical assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Safety
Drug Safety 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Safety is the official journal of the International Society of Pharmacovigilance. The journal includes: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues. Comprehensive narrative reviews that provide an authoritative source of information on epidemiology, clinical features, prevention and management of adverse effects of individual drugs and drug classes. In-depth benefit-risk assessment of adverse effect and efficacy data for a drug in a defined therapeutic area. Systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. Original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies in disciplines such as pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilance, pharmacology and toxicology, and pharmacogenomics. Editorials and commentaries on topical issues. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Drug Safety Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信