运动前康复对心脏手术后恢复质量的影响:单中心随机对照试验。

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Derek K W Yau, Floria F Ng, Man-Kin H Wong, Malcolm J Underwood, Randolph H L Wong, Gavin M Joynt, Anna Lee
{"title":"运动前康复对心脏手术后恢复质量的影响:单中心随机对照试验。","authors":"Derek K W Yau, Floria F Ng, Man-Kin H Wong, Malcolm J Underwood, Randolph H L Wong, Gavin M Joynt, Anna Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical prehabilitation can enhance patient resilience to surgical stress, but its effects are unclear in vulnerable and frail patients. We aimed to determine the effect of a structured exercise prehabilitation programme on the quality of recovery after cardiac surgery in vulnerable and frail participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-blinded, parallel-arm, superiority, randomised controlled trial recruited patients with a Clinical Frailty Scale of 4-6 undergoing cardiac surgery. Patients were randomised to either physical prehabilitation (twice weekly) or standard care (control); both arms received standard perioperative care. The primary outcome was Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score on the third day after surgery. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), days alive and at home (DAH<sub>30</sub>), and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 metric.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 164 randomised patients, 138 were included in the primary analysis (median age 64 [interquartile range 60-69] yr; 70% males). Compliance with the 5-week prehabilitation programme was high (82%), with no adverse exercise-induced events reported. There were no between-group differences in QoR-15 scores (median difference -3, 95% confidence interval [CI] -9 to 3), early and late MACCE, and DAH<sub>30</sub> (P=0.779). Prehabilitated patients had lower disability levels than control patients (P=0.022) at 90 days after surgery (mean difference -9%, 95% CI -17% to -2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A 5-week programme of physical prehabilitation in predominately prefrail patients was safe, but it did not enhance quality of recovery scores after surgery. Prehabilitation resulted in a clinically meaningful decrease in disability scores at 90 days after surgery.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ChiCTR1800016098.</p>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of exercise prehabilitation on quality of recovery after cardiac surgery: a single-centre randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Derek K W Yau, Floria F Ng, Man-Kin H Wong, Malcolm J Underwood, Randolph H L Wong, Gavin M Joynt, Anna Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical prehabilitation can enhance patient resilience to surgical stress, but its effects are unclear in vulnerable and frail patients. We aimed to determine the effect of a structured exercise prehabilitation programme on the quality of recovery after cardiac surgery in vulnerable and frail participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-blinded, parallel-arm, superiority, randomised controlled trial recruited patients with a Clinical Frailty Scale of 4-6 undergoing cardiac surgery. Patients were randomised to either physical prehabilitation (twice weekly) or standard care (control); both arms received standard perioperative care. The primary outcome was Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score on the third day after surgery. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), days alive and at home (DAH<sub>30</sub>), and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 metric.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 164 randomised patients, 138 were included in the primary analysis (median age 64 [interquartile range 60-69] yr; 70% males). Compliance with the 5-week prehabilitation programme was high (82%), with no adverse exercise-induced events reported. There were no between-group differences in QoR-15 scores (median difference -3, 95% confidence interval [CI] -9 to 3), early and late MACCE, and DAH<sub>30</sub> (P=0.779). Prehabilitated patients had lower disability levels than control patients (P=0.022) at 90 days after surgery (mean difference -9%, 95% CI -17% to -2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A 5-week programme of physical prehabilitation in predominately prefrail patients was safe, but it did not enhance quality of recovery scores after surgery. Prehabilitation resulted in a clinically meaningful decrease in disability scores at 90 days after surgery.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ChiCTR1800016098.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.039\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.039","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:身体预康复可增强患者对手术压力的适应能力,但其对脆弱和虚弱患者的效果尚不明确。我们旨在确定结构化运动康复计划对脆弱和虚弱患者心脏手术后恢复质量的影响:这项单盲、平行臂、优势随机对照试验招募了临床虚弱度量表为 4-6 的心脏手术患者。患者被随机分配到物理预康复(每周两次)或标准护理(对照组);两组患者均接受标准的围手术期护理。主要结果是术后第三天的恢复质量-15(QoR-15)评分。次要结果包括主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)、在家存活天数(DAH30)和世界卫生组织残疾评估表(WHODAS)2.0指标:在 164 名随机抽取的患者中,138 人被纳入主要分析(中位年龄为 64 [四分位数范围 60-69] 岁;70% 为男性)。患者对为期 5 周的康复训练计划的依从性很高(82%),没有运动引起的不良事件报告。QoR-15评分(中位数差异-3,95%置信区间[CI] -9至3)、早期和晚期MACCE以及DAH30均无组间差异(P=0.779)。术后90天时,康复前患者的残疾程度低于对照组患者(P=0.022)(平均差异为-9%,95% CI为-17%至-2%):对以偏瘫为主的患者进行为期 5 周的身体预康复训练是安全的,但并不能提高术后康复质量评分。临床试验注册:临床试验注册:ChiCTR1800016098。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of exercise prehabilitation on quality of recovery after cardiac surgery: a single-centre randomised controlled trial.

Background: Physical prehabilitation can enhance patient resilience to surgical stress, but its effects are unclear in vulnerable and frail patients. We aimed to determine the effect of a structured exercise prehabilitation programme on the quality of recovery after cardiac surgery in vulnerable and frail participants.

Methods: This single-blinded, parallel-arm, superiority, randomised controlled trial recruited patients with a Clinical Frailty Scale of 4-6 undergoing cardiac surgery. Patients were randomised to either physical prehabilitation (twice weekly) or standard care (control); both arms received standard perioperative care. The primary outcome was Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score on the third day after surgery. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), days alive and at home (DAH30), and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 metric.

Results: Of 164 randomised patients, 138 were included in the primary analysis (median age 64 [interquartile range 60-69] yr; 70% males). Compliance with the 5-week prehabilitation programme was high (82%), with no adverse exercise-induced events reported. There were no between-group differences in QoR-15 scores (median difference -3, 95% confidence interval [CI] -9 to 3), early and late MACCE, and DAH30 (P=0.779). Prehabilitated patients had lower disability levels than control patients (P=0.022) at 90 days after surgery (mean difference -9%, 95% CI -17% to -2%).

Conclusions: A 5-week programme of physical prehabilitation in predominately prefrail patients was safe, but it did not enhance quality of recovery scores after surgery. Prehabilitation resulted in a clinically meaningful decrease in disability scores at 90 days after surgery.

Clinical trial registration: ChiCTR1800016098.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信