Paweł Marek Łajczak , Sebastian Sirek , Dorota Wyględowska-Promieńska
{"title":"揭示人工智能在眼底图像乳头水肿诊断中的作用:通过诊断测试准确性荟萃分析和人类专家表现比较进行系统回顾。","authors":"Paweł Marek Łajczak , Sebastian Sirek , Dorota Wyględowska-Promieńska","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Papilledema is a condition, which is characterized by optic disc swelling due to increased intracranial pressure. Diagnostic modalities include fundus camera and other ophthalmology imaging techniques. The Frisén scale is used to grade the severity of this condition. In this paper, we investigate the application of artificial intelligence (AI) for detecting and grading papilledema from fundus images.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Following the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, a search of five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane) was conducted using MeSH terms related to AI and papilledema. The inclusion criteria were original articles that discussed AI applications for detecting or grading papilledema from fundus images. Extracted data included sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and technical and demographic characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The systematic review included 21 studies. In the meta-analysis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.97 and 0.98, respectively. High heterogeneity was observed (I<sup>2</sup> > 96%). Deep learning models outperformed traditional machine learning algorithms, with detection models being more effective than grading models. Publication bias was observed with Deek's plot. Several publications compared AI to human experts, showing superiority or non-inferiority of computer algorithms to humans.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AI models show high diagnostic accuracy in detecting papilledema, often surpassing human experts in sensitivity, though not always in specificity. Despite limitations related to patient selection, image sourcing, and heterogeneity, AI holds potential to significantly improve diagnostic accuracy and clinical workflows in ophthalmology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10578,"journal":{"name":"Computers in biology and medicine","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 109350"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling AI's role in papilledema diagnosis from fundus images: A systematic review with diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis and comparison of human expert performance\",\"authors\":\"Paweł Marek Łajczak , Sebastian Sirek , Dorota Wyględowska-Promieńska\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Papilledema is a condition, which is characterized by optic disc swelling due to increased intracranial pressure. Diagnostic modalities include fundus camera and other ophthalmology imaging techniques. The Frisén scale is used to grade the severity of this condition. In this paper, we investigate the application of artificial intelligence (AI) for detecting and grading papilledema from fundus images.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Following the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, a search of five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane) was conducted using MeSH terms related to AI and papilledema. The inclusion criteria were original articles that discussed AI applications for detecting or grading papilledema from fundus images. Extracted data included sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and technical and demographic characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The systematic review included 21 studies. In the meta-analysis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.97 and 0.98, respectively. High heterogeneity was observed (I<sup>2</sup> > 96%). Deep learning models outperformed traditional machine learning algorithms, with detection models being more effective than grading models. Publication bias was observed with Deek's plot. Several publications compared AI to human experts, showing superiority or non-inferiority of computer algorithms to humans.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AI models show high diagnostic accuracy in detecting papilledema, often surpassing human experts in sensitivity, though not always in specificity. Despite limitations related to patient selection, image sourcing, and heterogeneity, AI holds potential to significantly improve diagnostic accuracy and clinical workflows in ophthalmology.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in biology and medicine\",\"volume\":\"184 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109350\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in biology and medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482524014355\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482524014355","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unveiling AI's role in papilledema diagnosis from fundus images: A systematic review with diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis and comparison of human expert performance
Background
Papilledema is a condition, which is characterized by optic disc swelling due to increased intracranial pressure. Diagnostic modalities include fundus camera and other ophthalmology imaging techniques. The Frisén scale is used to grade the severity of this condition. In this paper, we investigate the application of artificial intelligence (AI) for detecting and grading papilledema from fundus images.
Method
Following the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, a search of five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane) was conducted using MeSH terms related to AI and papilledema. The inclusion criteria were original articles that discussed AI applications for detecting or grading papilledema from fundus images. Extracted data included sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and technical and demographic characteristics.
Results
The systematic review included 21 studies. In the meta-analysis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.97 and 0.98, respectively. High heterogeneity was observed (I2 > 96%). Deep learning models outperformed traditional machine learning algorithms, with detection models being more effective than grading models. Publication bias was observed with Deek's plot. Several publications compared AI to human experts, showing superiority or non-inferiority of computer algorithms to humans.
Conclusions
AI models show high diagnostic accuracy in detecting papilledema, often surpassing human experts in sensitivity, though not always in specificity. Despite limitations related to patient selection, image sourcing, and heterogeneity, AI holds potential to significantly improve diagnostic accuracy and clinical workflows in ophthalmology.
期刊介绍:
Computers in Biology and Medicine is an international forum for sharing groundbreaking advancements in the use of computers in bioscience and medicine. This journal serves as a medium for communicating essential research, instruction, ideas, and information regarding the rapidly evolving field of computer applications in these domains. By encouraging the exchange of knowledge, we aim to facilitate progress and innovation in the utilization of computers in biology and medicine.