日本机器人辅助根治性子宫切除术中期分析:一项多中心、前瞻性介入单臂临床试验。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Hiroe Ito, Yoshihito Yokoyama, Satoru Kyo, Masaki Mandai, Kenzo Kosaka, Hiroaki Kobayashi, Etsuko Miyagi, Mamiko Onuki, Koji Matsumoto, Noriomi Matsumura, Kota Umemura, Hideki Ishikawa, Keiichi Isaka
{"title":"日本机器人辅助根治性子宫切除术中期分析:一项多中心、前瞻性介入单臂临床试验。","authors":"Hiroe Ito, Yoshihito Yokoyama, Satoru Kyo, Masaki Mandai, Kenzo Kosaka, Hiroaki Kobayashi, Etsuko Miyagi, Mamiko Onuki, Koji Matsumoto, Noriomi Matsumura, Kota Umemura, Hideki Ishikawa, Keiichi Isaka","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13090-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (RARH) as a minimally invasive procedure in patients with cervical cancer that is curable by surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm clinical trial. The short-term outcome of open radical hysterectomy was used as the historical control. The primary endpoint was successful surgery with minimal blood loss (300 mL or less) and negative surgical margins. Secondary endpoints included surgical outcomes, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 101 cases were enrolled in this study at 10 participating medical institutions and 100 underwent RARH. Among these cases, 89 met the primary endpoint, exceeding the threshold of 0.75 set by the lower limit. At 2 years postoperatively, 17 cases had recurrences, 4 were classified as International federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Stage IB1 or lower, while 13 as IB2 or higher. There were three deaths, including one in Stage IB1 and two in Stage IIB in the second postoperative year, all of which had lymph node metastasis. The oncological outcomes for all cases showed RFS and OS rates of 82.7% and 96.9%, respectively, over a median observation period of 37 months. For cases with Stage IB1, RFS and OS were 94.1% and 98.5%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RARH demonstrated a significant reduction in blood loss while ensuring radicality, indicating the safety and efficacy of this procedure compared to conventional RH. Although it is conceivable that the results of this oncological analysis could change, as the data collection has not been fully completed, we plan to further evaluate the oncologic outcomes of RARH in future studies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>UMIN-CTR: UMIN000022278, registered on 11th May 2016.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1360"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interim analysis of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy in Japan: a multicenter, prospective interventional single-arm clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroe Ito, Yoshihito Yokoyama, Satoru Kyo, Masaki Mandai, Kenzo Kosaka, Hiroaki Kobayashi, Etsuko Miyagi, Mamiko Onuki, Koji Matsumoto, Noriomi Matsumura, Kota Umemura, Hideki Ishikawa, Keiichi Isaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12885-024-13090-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (RARH) as a minimally invasive procedure in patients with cervical cancer that is curable by surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm clinical trial. The short-term outcome of open radical hysterectomy was used as the historical control. The primary endpoint was successful surgery with minimal blood loss (300 mL or less) and negative surgical margins. Secondary endpoints included surgical outcomes, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 101 cases were enrolled in this study at 10 participating medical institutions and 100 underwent RARH. Among these cases, 89 met the primary endpoint, exceeding the threshold of 0.75 set by the lower limit. At 2 years postoperatively, 17 cases had recurrences, 4 were classified as International federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Stage IB1 or lower, while 13 as IB2 or higher. There were three deaths, including one in Stage IB1 and two in Stage IIB in the second postoperative year, all of which had lymph node metastasis. The oncological outcomes for all cases showed RFS and OS rates of 82.7% and 96.9%, respectively, over a median observation period of 37 months. For cases with Stage IB1, RFS and OS were 94.1% and 98.5%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RARH demonstrated a significant reduction in blood loss while ensuring radicality, indicating the safety and efficacy of this procedure compared to conventional RH. Although it is conceivable that the results of this oncological analysis could change, as the data collection has not been fully completed, we plan to further evaluate the oncologic outcomes of RARH in future studies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>UMIN-CTR: UMIN000022278, registered on 11th May 2016.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"1360\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542374/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13090-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13090-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究机器人辅助根治性子宫切除术(RARH)作为一种微创手术对可通过手术治愈的宫颈癌患者的有效性和安全性:本研究是一项多中心、开放标签、单臂临床试验。以开腹根治性子宫切除术的短期疗效作为历史对照。主要终点是手术成功,失血量最少(300 毫升或更少),手术边缘阴性。次要终点包括手术结果、无复发生存率(RFS)和总生存率(OS):10家参与研究的医疗机构共招募了101例病例,其中100例接受了RARH手术。在这些病例中,89 例达到了主要终点,超过了下限设定的阈值 0.75。术后 2 年,17 例复发,4 例被归类为国际妇产科联盟 IB1 期或更低,13 例被归类为 IB2 期或更高。术后第二年有3例死亡,其中1例为IB1期,2例为IIB期,均为淋巴结转移。所有病例的肿瘤治疗结果显示,在37个月的中位观察期内,RFS和OS率分别为82.7%和96.9%。IB1期病例的RFS和OS分别为94.1%和98.5%:结论:RARH在确保根治性的同时显著减少了失血量,表明该手术与传统RH相比具有安全性和有效性。尽管由于数据收集尚未完全完成,本次肿瘤学分析的结果可能会发生变化,但我们计划在未来的研究中进一步评估 RARH 的肿瘤学结果:UMIN-CTR:UMIN000022278,注册日期:2016年5月11日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interim analysis of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy in Japan: a multicenter, prospective interventional single-arm clinical trial.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (RARH) as a minimally invasive procedure in patients with cervical cancer that is curable by surgery.

Materials and methods: This study was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm clinical trial. The short-term outcome of open radical hysterectomy was used as the historical control. The primary endpoint was successful surgery with minimal blood loss (300 mL or less) and negative surgical margins. Secondary endpoints included surgical outcomes, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) rates.

Results: Overall, 101 cases were enrolled in this study at 10 participating medical institutions and 100 underwent RARH. Among these cases, 89 met the primary endpoint, exceeding the threshold of 0.75 set by the lower limit. At 2 years postoperatively, 17 cases had recurrences, 4 were classified as International federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Stage IB1 or lower, while 13 as IB2 or higher. There were three deaths, including one in Stage IB1 and two in Stage IIB in the second postoperative year, all of which had lymph node metastasis. The oncological outcomes for all cases showed RFS and OS rates of 82.7% and 96.9%, respectively, over a median observation period of 37 months. For cases with Stage IB1, RFS and OS were 94.1% and 98.5%, respectively.

Conclusion: RARH demonstrated a significant reduction in blood loss while ensuring radicality, indicating the safety and efficacy of this procedure compared to conventional RH. Although it is conceivable that the results of this oncological analysis could change, as the data collection has not been fully completed, we plan to further evaluate the oncologic outcomes of RARH in future studies.

Trial registration: UMIN-CTR: UMIN000022278, registered on 11th May 2016.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信