治疗局部晚期胸腔食管鳞状细胞癌的术后肿瘤床放射治疗与 T 型场放射治疗:IIb 期多中心随机对照试验。

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ya Zeng, Jiancheng Li, Jingjun Ye, Gaohua Han, Wenguang Luo, Chaoyang Wu, Songbing Qin, Wendong Gu, Shengguang Zhao, Yufei Zhao, Bing Xia, Zhengfei Zhu, Xianghui Du, Yuan Liu, Jun Liu, Hongxuan Li, Jiaming Wang, Jindong Guo, Wen Yu, Qin Zhang, Changlu Wang, Wentao Fang, Zhigang Li, Xiaolong Fu, Xuwei Cai
{"title":"治疗局部晚期胸腔食管鳞状细胞癌的术后肿瘤床放射治疗与 T 型场放射治疗:IIb 期多中心随机对照试验。","authors":"Ya Zeng, Jiancheng Li, Jingjun Ye, Gaohua Han, Wenguang Luo, Chaoyang Wu, Songbing Qin, Wendong Gu, Shengguang Zhao, Yufei Zhao, Bing Xia, Zhengfei Zhu, Xianghui Du, Yuan Liu, Jun Liu, Hongxuan Li, Jiaming Wang, Jindong Guo, Wen Yu, Qin Zhang, Changlu Wang, Wentao Fang, Zhigang Li, Xiaolong Fu, Xuwei Cai","doi":"10.1186/s12916-024-03727-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is crucial for patients with thoracic locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC, pT3-4aN0-3M0) following esophagectomy. However, the appropriate radiation volume has not been well established. This study aimed to determine the optimal PORT volume for LA-ESCC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>LA-ESCC patients post-esophagectomy were randomly assigned to either the large-field irradiation (LFI, primary lesion and lymph node tumor bed plus elective nodal irradiation) group or the small-field irradiation (SFI, primary lesion and lymph node tumor bed alone) group. Stratification was based on T stage and the number of lymph node metastases. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), while the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), adverse events, and patterns of initial failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 401 patients were randomly assigned to the intention-to-treat analysis(LFI group, n = 210; SFI group, n = 191). The median DFS of patients in the LFI group was 47.9 months and 48.1 months in the SFI group (HR = 0.87, 95%CI, 0.65 to 1.16; p = 0.32). The estimated one-year and three-year OS rates were 89.2% and 63.2% for patients in the LFI group, compared to 86.6% and 60.7% for the SFI group, respectively. The difference of OS between the two groups was not significant (HR = 0.86, 95%CI, 0.63 to 1.16; p = 0.35). Fewer patients in the LFI group experienced locoregional recurrence compared to the SFI group (12.9% vs 20.4%, p = 0.013). Additionally, locoregional recurrence-free survival of the LFI group was significantly longer than that of SFI group (HR = 0.54, 95%CI, 0.34-0.87; p = 0.01). The most common toxicity was grade 2 esophagitis, observed in 22.9% of the LFI group and 16.8% of the SFI group. Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 6.7% of the LFI group and 2.6% of the SFI group. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed. Adverse events did not significantly differ between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Postoperative radiotherapy, with the specified radiation volume shows encouraging survival outcomes that are comparable to those of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with thoracic LA-ESCC. Both postoperative irradiation fields were found to be feasible and safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"22 1","pages":"522"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11545895/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative tumor bed radiation versus T-shaped field radiation in the treatment of locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase IIb multicenter randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ya Zeng, Jiancheng Li, Jingjun Ye, Gaohua Han, Wenguang Luo, Chaoyang Wu, Songbing Qin, Wendong Gu, Shengguang Zhao, Yufei Zhao, Bing Xia, Zhengfei Zhu, Xianghui Du, Yuan Liu, Jun Liu, Hongxuan Li, Jiaming Wang, Jindong Guo, Wen Yu, Qin Zhang, Changlu Wang, Wentao Fang, Zhigang Li, Xiaolong Fu, Xuwei Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12916-024-03727-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is crucial for patients with thoracic locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC, pT3-4aN0-3M0) following esophagectomy. However, the appropriate radiation volume has not been well established. This study aimed to determine the optimal PORT volume for LA-ESCC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>LA-ESCC patients post-esophagectomy were randomly assigned to either the large-field irradiation (LFI, primary lesion and lymph node tumor bed plus elective nodal irradiation) group or the small-field irradiation (SFI, primary lesion and lymph node tumor bed alone) group. Stratification was based on T stage and the number of lymph node metastases. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), while the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), adverse events, and patterns of initial failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 401 patients were randomly assigned to the intention-to-treat analysis(LFI group, n = 210; SFI group, n = 191). The median DFS of patients in the LFI group was 47.9 months and 48.1 months in the SFI group (HR = 0.87, 95%CI, 0.65 to 1.16; p = 0.32). The estimated one-year and three-year OS rates were 89.2% and 63.2% for patients in the LFI group, compared to 86.6% and 60.7% for the SFI group, respectively. The difference of OS between the two groups was not significant (HR = 0.86, 95%CI, 0.63 to 1.16; p = 0.35). Fewer patients in the LFI group experienced locoregional recurrence compared to the SFI group (12.9% vs 20.4%, p = 0.013). Additionally, locoregional recurrence-free survival of the LFI group was significantly longer than that of SFI group (HR = 0.54, 95%CI, 0.34-0.87; p = 0.01). The most common toxicity was grade 2 esophagitis, observed in 22.9% of the LFI group and 16.8% of the SFI group. Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 6.7% of the LFI group and 2.6% of the SFI group. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed. Adverse events did not significantly differ between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Postoperative radiotherapy, with the specified radiation volume shows encouraging survival outcomes that are comparable to those of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with thoracic LA-ESCC. Both postoperative irradiation fields were found to be feasible and safe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medicine\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"522\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11545895/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03727-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03727-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胸腔局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(LA-ESCC,pT3-4aN0-3M0)患者在接受食管切除术后,术后放疗(PORT)至关重要。然而,适当的放射量尚未得到很好的确定。本研究旨在确定 LA-ESCC 患者的最佳 PORT 放射量:方法:将食管切除术后的 LA-ESCC 患者随机分配到大野照射(LFI,原发病灶和淋巴结肿瘤床加选择性结节照射)组或小野照射(SFI,仅原发病灶和淋巴结肿瘤床)组。根据T分期和淋巴结转移数量进行分层。主要终点是无病生存期(DFS),次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、不良事件和初始失败模式:共有401名患者被随机分配到意向治疗分析中(LFI组,210人;SFI组,191人)。LFI 组患者的中位 DFS 为 47.9 个月,SFI 组为 48.1 个月(HR = 0.87,95%CI,0.65 至 1.16;P = 0.32)。LFI组患者一年和三年的估计OS率分别为89.2%和63.2%,而SFI组分别为86.6%和60.7%。两组患者的 OS 差异不大(HR = 0.86,95%CI,0.63 至 1.16;P = 0.35)。与SFI组相比,LFI组出现局部复发的患者更少(12.9% vs 20.4%,P = 0.013)。此外,LFI 组的无局部复发生存期明显长于 SFI 组(HR = 0.54,95%CI,0.34-0.87;P = 0.01)。最常见的毒性是2级食管炎,在LFI组和SFI组分别有22.9%和16.8%的患者出现2级食管炎。6.7% 的 LFI 组和 2.6% 的 SFI 组出现了 3 级不良反应。未观察到 4 级或 5 级毒性反应。两组患者的不良反应无明显差异:结论:在胸腔LA-ESCC患者中,术后放疗的指定照射量显示出令人鼓舞的生存效果,与新辅助化放疗的生存效果相当。两种术后照射区域均可行且安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postoperative tumor bed radiation versus T-shaped field radiation in the treatment of locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase IIb multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Background: Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is crucial for patients with thoracic locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC, pT3-4aN0-3M0) following esophagectomy. However, the appropriate radiation volume has not been well established. This study aimed to determine the optimal PORT volume for LA-ESCC patients.

Methods: LA-ESCC patients post-esophagectomy were randomly assigned to either the large-field irradiation (LFI, primary lesion and lymph node tumor bed plus elective nodal irradiation) group or the small-field irradiation (SFI, primary lesion and lymph node tumor bed alone) group. Stratification was based on T stage and the number of lymph node metastases. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), while the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), adverse events, and patterns of initial failure.

Results: A total of 401 patients were randomly assigned to the intention-to-treat analysis(LFI group, n = 210; SFI group, n = 191). The median DFS of patients in the LFI group was 47.9 months and 48.1 months in the SFI group (HR = 0.87, 95%CI, 0.65 to 1.16; p = 0.32). The estimated one-year and three-year OS rates were 89.2% and 63.2% for patients in the LFI group, compared to 86.6% and 60.7% for the SFI group, respectively. The difference of OS between the two groups was not significant (HR = 0.86, 95%CI, 0.63 to 1.16; p = 0.35). Fewer patients in the LFI group experienced locoregional recurrence compared to the SFI group (12.9% vs 20.4%, p = 0.013). Additionally, locoregional recurrence-free survival of the LFI group was significantly longer than that of SFI group (HR = 0.54, 95%CI, 0.34-0.87; p = 0.01). The most common toxicity was grade 2 esophagitis, observed in 22.9% of the LFI group and 16.8% of the SFI group. Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 6.7% of the LFI group and 2.6% of the SFI group. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed. Adverse events did not significantly differ between the two groups.

Conclusions: Postoperative radiotherapy, with the specified radiation volume shows encouraging survival outcomes that are comparable to those of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with thoracic LA-ESCC. Both postoperative irradiation fields were found to be feasible and safe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信