再放疗加 pembrolizumab:针对复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者的 II 期研究

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Fabio M. Iwamoto, Shyam K. Tanguturi, Lakshmi Nayak, Tony J. Wang, Arati Desai, Robert A. Lustig, Stephen Bagley, Eric T. Wong, Lauren M. Hertan, Christine McCluskey, Julia Hayden, Alona Muzikansky, Shreya Nakhawa, Julia Japo, Connor C. Bossi, Maxime Meylan, Ye Tian, Graham L. Barlow, Paul Speliakos, Georges Ayoub, David M. Meredith, Keith L. Ligon, Daphne Haas-Kogan, Kun Huang, Kai W. Wucherpfennig, Patrick Y. Wen, David A. Reardon
{"title":"再放疗加 pembrolizumab:针对复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者的 II 期研究","authors":"Fabio M. Iwamoto, Shyam K. Tanguturi, Lakshmi Nayak, Tony J. Wang, Arati Desai, Robert A. Lustig, Stephen Bagley, Eric T. Wong, Lauren M. Hertan, Christine McCluskey, Julia Hayden, Alona Muzikansky, Shreya Nakhawa, Julia Japo, Connor C. Bossi, Maxime Meylan, Ye Tian, Graham L. Barlow, Paul Speliakos, Georges Ayoub, David M. Meredith, Keith L. Ligon, Daphne Haas-Kogan, Kun Huang, Kai W. Wucherpfennig, Patrick Y. Wen, David A. Reardon","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-1629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Radiation therapy may enhance anti-tumor immune responses by several mechanisms including induction of immunogenic cell death. We performed a phase 2 study of pembrolizumab with re-irradiation in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Methods: Sixty recurrent glioblastoma patients received pembrolizumab with re-irradiation alone (cohort A, bevacizumab-naïve; n=30) or with bevacizumab continuation (cohort B, n=30). Dual primary endpoints including overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival at either 12 (OS-12; cohort A) or six months (OS-6; cohort B) were assessed per cohort relative to historical benchmarks. Paired paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed tumor samples were assessed for immunologic biomarkers by immunohistochemistry using digital quantification and Co-Detection-by-InDEXing (CODEX). Results: Study therapy was well tolerated with most toxicities being grade ≤ 3. For cohort B, the primary endpoint of OS-6 was achieved (57%), however survival was not improved for cohort A patients. The ORR was 3.3% and 6.7% for cohorts A and B, respectively. CODEX analysis of paired tumor samples from 5 patients revealed an increase of activated T cells in the tumor microenvironment after study therapy. Conclusions: Compared to historical controls, re-irradiation plus pembrolizumab appeared to improve survival among bevacizumab-refractory patients but not among bevacizumab-naïve patients. CODEX revealed evidence of intratumoral infiltration of activated immune effector cells. A randomized, properly controlled trial of PD-1 blockade plus re-irradiation is warranted to further evaluate this regimen for bevacizumab refractory patients, but alternative approaches are needed for bevacizumab-naïve patients.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-irradiation plus pembrolizumab: Phase II study for recurrent glioblastoma patients\",\"authors\":\"Fabio M. Iwamoto, Shyam K. Tanguturi, Lakshmi Nayak, Tony J. Wang, Arati Desai, Robert A. Lustig, Stephen Bagley, Eric T. Wong, Lauren M. Hertan, Christine McCluskey, Julia Hayden, Alona Muzikansky, Shreya Nakhawa, Julia Japo, Connor C. Bossi, Maxime Meylan, Ye Tian, Graham L. Barlow, Paul Speliakos, Georges Ayoub, David M. Meredith, Keith L. Ligon, Daphne Haas-Kogan, Kun Huang, Kai W. Wucherpfennig, Patrick Y. Wen, David A. Reardon\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-1629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Radiation therapy may enhance anti-tumor immune responses by several mechanisms including induction of immunogenic cell death. We performed a phase 2 study of pembrolizumab with re-irradiation in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Methods: Sixty recurrent glioblastoma patients received pembrolizumab with re-irradiation alone (cohort A, bevacizumab-naïve; n=30) or with bevacizumab continuation (cohort B, n=30). Dual primary endpoints including overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival at either 12 (OS-12; cohort A) or six months (OS-6; cohort B) were assessed per cohort relative to historical benchmarks. Paired paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed tumor samples were assessed for immunologic biomarkers by immunohistochemistry using digital quantification and Co-Detection-by-InDEXing (CODEX). Results: Study therapy was well tolerated with most toxicities being grade ≤ 3. For cohort B, the primary endpoint of OS-6 was achieved (57%), however survival was not improved for cohort A patients. The ORR was 3.3% and 6.7% for cohorts A and B, respectively. CODEX analysis of paired tumor samples from 5 patients revealed an increase of activated T cells in the tumor microenvironment after study therapy. Conclusions: Compared to historical controls, re-irradiation plus pembrolizumab appeared to improve survival among bevacizumab-refractory patients but not among bevacizumab-naïve patients. CODEX revealed evidence of intratumoral infiltration of activated immune effector cells. A randomized, properly controlled trial of PD-1 blockade plus re-irradiation is warranted to further evaluate this regimen for bevacizumab refractory patients, but alternative approaches are needed for bevacizumab-naïve patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-1629\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-1629","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:放射治疗可通过多种机制(包括诱导免疫原性细胞死亡)增强抗肿瘤免疫反应。我们对复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者进行了pembrolizumab联合再放疗的2期研究。研究方法60名复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者接受了pembrolizumab联合再照射单独治疗(队列A,贝伐珠单抗无效;人数=30)或贝伐珠单抗继续治疗(队列B,人数=30)。相对于历史基准,对每个队列进行了双重主要终点评估,包括总反应率(ORR)和 12 个月(OS-12;队列 A)或 6 个月(OS-6;队列 B)的总存活率。使用数字量化和CODEX(Co-Detection-by-InDEXing)免疫组化技术对配对石蜡包埋福尔马林固定的肿瘤样本进行免疫生物标记物评估。研究结果研究治疗耐受性良好,大多数毒性反应≤3级。B组患者达到了OS-6的主要终点(57%),但A组患者的生存率并没有提高。A组和B组的ORR分别为3.3%和6.7%。对5名患者的配对肿瘤样本进行的CODEX分析显示,研究治疗后肿瘤微环境中的活化T细胞有所增加。结论与历史对照组相比,再照射加pembrolizumab似乎能提高贝伐珠单抗难治患者的生存率,但不能提高贝伐珠单抗无效患者的生存率。CODEX显示了活化免疫效应细胞在瘤内浸润的证据。有必要对PD-1阻断+再照射进行随机、适当的对照试验,以进一步评估贝伐珠单抗难治性患者的这一治疗方案,但对于贝伐珠单抗无效患者,则需要采用其他方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re-irradiation plus pembrolizumab: Phase II study for recurrent glioblastoma patients
Purpose: Radiation therapy may enhance anti-tumor immune responses by several mechanisms including induction of immunogenic cell death. We performed a phase 2 study of pembrolizumab with re-irradiation in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Methods: Sixty recurrent glioblastoma patients received pembrolizumab with re-irradiation alone (cohort A, bevacizumab-naïve; n=30) or with bevacizumab continuation (cohort B, n=30). Dual primary endpoints including overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival at either 12 (OS-12; cohort A) or six months (OS-6; cohort B) were assessed per cohort relative to historical benchmarks. Paired paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed tumor samples were assessed for immunologic biomarkers by immunohistochemistry using digital quantification and Co-Detection-by-InDEXing (CODEX). Results: Study therapy was well tolerated with most toxicities being grade ≤ 3. For cohort B, the primary endpoint of OS-6 was achieved (57%), however survival was not improved for cohort A patients. The ORR was 3.3% and 6.7% for cohorts A and B, respectively. CODEX analysis of paired tumor samples from 5 patients revealed an increase of activated T cells in the tumor microenvironment after study therapy. Conclusions: Compared to historical controls, re-irradiation plus pembrolizumab appeared to improve survival among bevacizumab-refractory patients but not among bevacizumab-naïve patients. CODEX revealed evidence of intratumoral infiltration of activated immune effector cells. A randomized, properly controlled trial of PD-1 blockade plus re-irradiation is warranted to further evaluate this regimen for bevacizumab refractory patients, but alternative approaches are needed for bevacizumab-naïve patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
1207
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信