{"title":"碳市场一体化、生产力和福利:定量分析","authors":"Yuying Liu, Yongjin Wang, Xiaofan Li","doi":"10.1111/joes.12637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>China's carbon market is far from being integrated. This paper studies how carbon emissions reduction and carbon market integration affect China's aggregate productivity and welfare via a quantitative spatial general equilibrium model with <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>CO</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm CO}_2$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> as a by-product of production. We find that (1) were carbon emission rights to be allowed to be traded across regions, (i) if there is no technological growth, China's overall productivity and real GDP would increase by 10.26%, and 27.19% respectively, and welfare would decline slightly by 0.92%; (ii) if the technology grows at the present growth rate, China's total output, real GDP and welfare would increase by 9.97, 38.57, and 7.79%, respectively; (2) were nine regional carbon trading markets integrated, China's overall productivity, real GDP and welfare would increase by 4.35, 29.17, and 7.75%, respectively. Carbon market integration enables China to achieve economic development at a lower <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>CO</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${\\rm CO}_2$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":51374,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Surveys","volume":"38 5","pages":"1819-1845"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon market integration, productivity, and welfare: A quantitative analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yuying Liu, Yongjin Wang, Xiaofan Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joes.12637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>China's carbon market is far from being integrated. This paper studies how carbon emissions reduction and carbon market integration affect China's aggregate productivity and welfare via a quantitative spatial general equilibrium model with <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>CO</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${\\\\rm CO}_2$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> as a by-product of production. We find that (1) were carbon emission rights to be allowed to be traded across regions, (i) if there is no technological growth, China's overall productivity and real GDP would increase by 10.26%, and 27.19% respectively, and welfare would decline slightly by 0.92%; (ii) if the technology grows at the present growth rate, China's total output, real GDP and welfare would increase by 9.97, 38.57, and 7.79%, respectively; (2) were nine regional carbon trading markets integrated, China's overall productivity, real GDP and welfare would increase by 4.35, 29.17, and 7.75%, respectively. Carbon market integration enables China to achieve economic development at a lower <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>CO</mi>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${\\\\rm CO}_2$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> cost.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Surveys\",\"volume\":\"38 5\",\"pages\":\"1819-1845\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Surveys\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joes.12637\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Surveys","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joes.12637","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
中国的碳市场远未实现一体化。本文通过一个定量空间一般均衡模型,以二氧化碳 ${\rm CO}_2$ 为生产副产品,研究碳减排和碳市场一体化如何影响中国的总体生产率和福利。我们发现:(1) 如果允许碳排放权跨地区交易,(i) 如果没有技术增长,中国的总体生产率和实际 GDP 将分别提高 10.26% 和 27.19%,福利将略微下降 0.92%;(ii) 如果允许碳排放权跨地区交易,如果没有技术增长,中国的总体生产率和实际 GDP 将分别提高 10.26% 和 27.19%,福利将略微下降 0.92%。92%;②如果技术以目前的增长率增长,中国的总产出、实际 GDP 和福利将分别增长 9.97%、38.57%和 7.79%;②如果 9 个区域碳交易市场实现一体化,中国的总体生产率、实际 GDP 和福利将分别增长 4.35%、29.17%和 7.75%。 碳市场一体化使中国能够以较低的二氧化碳排放成本实现经济发展。
Carbon market integration, productivity, and welfare: A quantitative analysis
China's carbon market is far from being integrated. This paper studies how carbon emissions reduction and carbon market integration affect China's aggregate productivity and welfare via a quantitative spatial general equilibrium model with as a by-product of production. We find that (1) were carbon emission rights to be allowed to be traded across regions, (i) if there is no technological growth, China's overall productivity and real GDP would increase by 10.26%, and 27.19% respectively, and welfare would decline slightly by 0.92%; (ii) if the technology grows at the present growth rate, China's total output, real GDP and welfare would increase by 9.97, 38.57, and 7.79%, respectively; (2) were nine regional carbon trading markets integrated, China's overall productivity, real GDP and welfare would increase by 4.35, 29.17, and 7.75%, respectively. Carbon market integration enables China to achieve economic development at a lower cost.
期刊介绍:
As economics becomes increasingly specialized, communication amongst economists becomes even more important. The Journal of Economic Surveys seeks to improve the communication of new ideas. It provides a means by which economists can keep abreast of recent developments beyond their immediate specialization. Areas covered include: - economics - econometrics - economic history - business economics