医学生对美国临床流产培训机会的看法

IF 1.4 3区医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.srhc.2024.101042

Tessa Meurer , Elise S. Cowley , Laura Jacques

{"title":"医学生对美国临床流产培训机会的看法","authors":"Tessa Meurer , Elise S. Cowley , Laura Jacques","doi":"10.1016/j.srhc.2024.101042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Federal abortion protection reversals have increased the importance of understanding and addressing regional disparities in clinical abortion training. We surveyed Medical Students for Choice leaders in July 2022 about abortion training and analyzed results by state abortion laws. Of 100 survey respondents, 50 % reported institutional access to abortion training (17.5 % in restrictive states; 71.2 % in permissive states; χ<sup>2</sup> = 25.9, p < 0.00001) and 46 % indicated that they or a peer had attended a visiting student elective (VSE) covering abortion care (47.5 % in restricted states; 51.9 % in permissive states). Availability of clinical abortion training varies geographically by state abortion laws. VSEs may be underutilized.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54199,"journal":{"name":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 101042"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical student perceptions of clinical abortion training opportunities across the United States\",\"authors\":\"Tessa Meurer , Elise S. Cowley , Laura Jacques\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.srhc.2024.101042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Federal abortion protection reversals have increased the importance of understanding and addressing regional disparities in clinical abortion training. We surveyed Medical Students for Choice leaders in July 2022 about abortion training and analyzed results by state abortion laws. Of 100 survey respondents, 50 % reported institutional access to abortion training (17.5 % in restrictive states; 71.2 % in permissive states; χ<sup>2</sup> = 25.9, p < 0.00001) and 46 % indicated that they or a peer had attended a visiting student elective (VSE) covering abortion care (47.5 % in restricted states; 51.9 % in permissive states). Availability of clinical abortion training varies geographically by state abortion laws. VSEs may be underutilized.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101042\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877575624000971\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877575624000971","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

联邦堕胎保护的撤销增加了了解和解决临床堕胎培训地区差异的重要性。2022 年 7 月，我们对 "医学生支持选择 "组织的领导人进行了有关堕胎培训的调查，并根据各州的堕胎法律对调查结果进行了分析。在 100 名调查对象中，50% 的人表示有机构提供堕胎培训（限制性州为 17.5%；允许性州为 71.2%；χ2 = 25.9，p < 0.00001），46% 的人表示他们或同伴参加过涵盖堕胎护理的访问学生选修课 (VSE)（限制性州为 47.5%；允许性州为 51.9%）。临床堕胎培训的提供情况因各州堕胎法律的不同而存在地域差异。VSE 可能未得到充分利用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Medical student perceptions of clinical abortion training opportunities across the United States

Federal abortion protection reversals have increased the importance of understanding and addressing regional disparities in clinical abortion training. We surveyed Medical Students for Choice leaders in July 2022 about abortion training and analyzed results by state abortion laws. Of 100 survey respondents, 50 % reported institutional access to abortion training (17.5 % in restrictive states; 71.2 % in permissive states; χ² = 25.9, p < 0.00001) and 46 % indicated that they or a peer had attended a visiting student elective (VSE) covering abortion care (47.5 % in restricted states; 51.9 % in permissive states). Availability of clinical abortion training varies geographically by state abortion laws. VSEs may be underutilized.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

5.60%

发文量

审稿时长

45 days