{"title":"医疗保健专业人员跨组织访问电子健康记录:范围界定审查","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cross-organizational access to shared electronic health records can enhance integrated, people-centered health services. However, a gap remains between these potential benefits and the limited support currently offered by electronic health records. The Valkyrie research project aims to bridge this gap by developing a technical prototype of an architecture to promote healthcare service coordination.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To inform the Valkyrie project, we aimed to evaluate approaches for healthcare professionals’ access to electronic health records across healthcare providers and identify factors influencing the success and failure of these approaches.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Using the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for scoping reviews, searches were conducted in six research databases and grey literature, without limitations on year or language. Papers selected for full-text review were analyzed, and data was extracted using standardized forms that reflected the population, concept, and context framework and the categorization model used in the qualitative analysis of the barriers and facilitators reported in the included papers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 290 identified papers, five were deemed eligible for full-text review. The included papers were heterogeneous in country, year of publication, study setting, implementation level, and access approaches to electronic health records, highlighting various techniques, from federated to centralized, for accessing shared electronic health records.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><div>The review did not identify one single superior access approach. However, a hybrid approach incorporating components from the different approaches combined with emerging technologies may benefit the Valkyrie project. The key facilitators were identified as improved information quality and flexible and easy access. In contrast, lack of trust and poor information quality were significant barriers to successful cross-organizational access to electronic health records. Future research should explore alternative access approaches, considering information quality, user training, and collegial trust across healthcare providers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare professionals’ cross-organizational access to electronic health records: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cross-organizational access to shared electronic health records can enhance integrated, people-centered health services. However, a gap remains between these potential benefits and the limited support currently offered by electronic health records. The Valkyrie research project aims to bridge this gap by developing a technical prototype of an architecture to promote healthcare service coordination.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To inform the Valkyrie project, we aimed to evaluate approaches for healthcare professionals’ access to electronic health records across healthcare providers and identify factors influencing the success and failure of these approaches.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Using the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for scoping reviews, searches were conducted in six research databases and grey literature, without limitations on year or language. Papers selected for full-text review were analyzed, and data was extracted using standardized forms that reflected the population, concept, and context framework and the categorization model used in the qualitative analysis of the barriers and facilitators reported in the included papers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 290 identified papers, five were deemed eligible for full-text review. The included papers were heterogeneous in country, year of publication, study setting, implementation level, and access approaches to electronic health records, highlighting various techniques, from federated to centralized, for accessing shared electronic health records.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><div>The review did not identify one single superior access approach. However, a hybrid approach incorporating components from the different approaches combined with emerging technologies may benefit the Valkyrie project. The key facilitators were identified as improved information quality and flexible and easy access. In contrast, lack of trust and poor information quality were significant barriers to successful cross-organizational access to electronic health records. Future research should explore alternative access approaches, considering information quality, user training, and collegial trust across healthcare providers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Informatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505624003514\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505624003514","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Healthcare professionals’ cross-organizational access to electronic health records: A scoping review
Background
Cross-organizational access to shared electronic health records can enhance integrated, people-centered health services. However, a gap remains between these potential benefits and the limited support currently offered by electronic health records. The Valkyrie research project aims to bridge this gap by developing a technical prototype of an architecture to promote healthcare service coordination.
Objective
To inform the Valkyrie project, we aimed to evaluate approaches for healthcare professionals’ access to electronic health records across healthcare providers and identify factors influencing the success and failure of these approaches.
Materials and methods
Using the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for scoping reviews, searches were conducted in six research databases and grey literature, without limitations on year or language. Papers selected for full-text review were analyzed, and data was extracted using standardized forms that reflected the population, concept, and context framework and the categorization model used in the qualitative analysis of the barriers and facilitators reported in the included papers.
Results
Among the 290 identified papers, five were deemed eligible for full-text review. The included papers were heterogeneous in country, year of publication, study setting, implementation level, and access approaches to electronic health records, highlighting various techniques, from federated to centralized, for accessing shared electronic health records.
Discussion and conclusion
The review did not identify one single superior access approach. However, a hybrid approach incorporating components from the different approaches combined with emerging technologies may benefit the Valkyrie project. The key facilitators were identified as improved information quality and flexible and easy access. In contrast, lack of trust and poor information quality were significant barriers to successful cross-organizational access to electronic health records. Future research should explore alternative access approaches, considering information quality, user training, and collegial trust across healthcare providers.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings.
The scope of journal covers:
Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.;
Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc.
Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general;
Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.