Ching-En Chen , Chun-Yu Ma , Chin-Jung Feng , Tien-Hsiang Wang , Yu-Chung Shih , Chih-Hsun Lin , Szu-Hsien Wu , Fu-Yin Hsiao , Mei-Chun Chen , Hsu Ma , Cherng-Kang Perng
{"title":"复合下颌缺损重建中游离腓骨瓣供体腿和受体血管选择的比较分析","authors":"Ching-En Chen , Chun-Yu Ma , Chin-Jung Feng , Tien-Hsiang Wang , Yu-Chung Shih , Chih-Hsun Lin , Szu-Hsien Wu , Fu-Yin Hsiao , Mei-Chun Chen , Hsu Ma , Cherng-Kang Perng","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.10.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The free fibula flap (FFF) is acknowledged as the primary choice for reconstructing composite oromandibular defects (COMDs), yet the impact of donor leg selection remains inadequately explored. This study aims to investigate the correlation between flap failure and the choice of donor leg and recipient vessel side.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>In a retrospective analysis spanning 2011 to 2020, FFFs for COMD were examined using electronic records. Patient data, comorbidities, radiation history, FFF details, and intraoperative variables were considered. Laterality was categorized into “Cis” and “Trans” groups, further subclassified based on blood supply. Analyses involved logistic regression, bivariate analysis, and propensity score matching.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 155 subjects with intraoral mucosal defects repaired only by the skin paddle of FFF were included. Cases were categorized into “Cis” (n = 65; 42%) and “Trans” (n = 90; 58%) groups based on COMD side and donor leg selection. No significant baseline differences emerged. Logistic regression found no laterality impact on total FFF failure. Initially, gender correlated with flap failure, but adjustment diminished the association. Partial skin paddle necrosis correlated with diabetes, not laterality. Propensity score matching revealed no significant differences between right and left legs in laterality or total flap failure risk. Subgroup analysis found no differences in parameters or flap failure rates within “Cis” and “Trans” groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Donor leg selection in COMD reconstruction with FFFs does not exhibit specificity. Furthermore, despite potential limitations in vessel anastomosis due to pedicle length or trauma history, recipient vessel side selection does not evidently affect flap failure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of free fibula flap donor leg and recipient vessel selection in composite oromandibular defect reconstructions\",\"authors\":\"Ching-En Chen , Chun-Yu Ma , Chin-Jung Feng , Tien-Hsiang Wang , Yu-Chung Shih , Chih-Hsun Lin , Szu-Hsien Wu , Fu-Yin Hsiao , Mei-Chun Chen , Hsu Ma , Cherng-Kang Perng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.10.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The free fibula flap (FFF) is acknowledged as the primary choice for reconstructing composite oromandibular defects (COMDs), yet the impact of donor leg selection remains inadequately explored. This study aims to investigate the correlation between flap failure and the choice of donor leg and recipient vessel side.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>In a retrospective analysis spanning 2011 to 2020, FFFs for COMD were examined using electronic records. Patient data, comorbidities, radiation history, FFF details, and intraoperative variables were considered. Laterality was categorized into “Cis” and “Trans” groups, further subclassified based on blood supply. Analyses involved logistic regression, bivariate analysis, and propensity score matching.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 155 subjects with intraoral mucosal defects repaired only by the skin paddle of FFF were included. Cases were categorized into “Cis” (n = 65; 42%) and “Trans” (n = 90; 58%) groups based on COMD side and donor leg selection. No significant baseline differences emerged. Logistic regression found no laterality impact on total FFF failure. Initially, gender correlated with flap failure, but adjustment diminished the association. Partial skin paddle necrosis correlated with diabetes, not laterality. Propensity score matching revealed no significant differences between right and left legs in laterality or total flap failure risk. Subgroup analysis found no differences in parameters or flap failure rates within “Cis” and “Trans” groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Donor leg selection in COMD reconstruction with FFFs does not exhibit specificity. Furthermore, despite potential limitations in vessel anastomosis due to pedicle length or trauma history, recipient vessel side selection does not evidently affect flap failure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524006624\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524006624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparative analysis of free fibula flap donor leg and recipient vessel selection in composite oromandibular defect reconstructions
Background
The free fibula flap (FFF) is acknowledged as the primary choice for reconstructing composite oromandibular defects (COMDs), yet the impact of donor leg selection remains inadequately explored. This study aims to investigate the correlation between flap failure and the choice of donor leg and recipient vessel side.
Materials and methods
In a retrospective analysis spanning 2011 to 2020, FFFs for COMD were examined using electronic records. Patient data, comorbidities, radiation history, FFF details, and intraoperative variables were considered. Laterality was categorized into “Cis” and “Trans” groups, further subclassified based on blood supply. Analyses involved logistic regression, bivariate analysis, and propensity score matching.
Results
A total of 155 subjects with intraoral mucosal defects repaired only by the skin paddle of FFF were included. Cases were categorized into “Cis” (n = 65; 42%) and “Trans” (n = 90; 58%) groups based on COMD side and donor leg selection. No significant baseline differences emerged. Logistic regression found no laterality impact on total FFF failure. Initially, gender correlated with flap failure, but adjustment diminished the association. Partial skin paddle necrosis correlated with diabetes, not laterality. Propensity score matching revealed no significant differences between right and left legs in laterality or total flap failure risk. Subgroup analysis found no differences in parameters or flap failure rates within “Cis” and “Trans” groups.
Conclusion
Donor leg selection in COMD reconstruction with FFFs does not exhibit specificity. Furthermore, despite potential limitations in vessel anastomosis due to pedicle length or trauma history, recipient vessel side selection does not evidently affect flap failure.
期刊介绍:
JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery.
The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.