COVID-19 期间德国的集权战略:延续还是中断趋势?

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ines Marina Niehaus , Andreas Lehr , André Kaiser , Helena Sophie Müller , Ludwig Kuntz
{"title":"COVID-19 期间德国的集权战略:延续还是中断趋势?","authors":"Ines Marina Niehaus ,&nbsp;Andreas Lehr ,&nbsp;André Kaiser ,&nbsp;Helena Sophie Müller ,&nbsp;Ludwig Kuntz","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries applied centralization strategies to the distribution of power between national government and regional/local governments over responsibility for regulatory tasks. As a result, health-policy decision-making competences were shifted from the regional level to the national level (vertical shift of decision-making competences). This centralization trend for the purpose of infection control is evident in Germany. We conducted a quantitative and qualitative analysis of health-policy regulatory measures (March 2018 to March 2020) in order to investigate whether the vertical shift in decision-making competences was already a trend in Germany before the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond infection control. Our results show that the centralization strategy observed during COVID-19 does not continue a trend. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, what was most important was the distribution of power at national level between government and non-government institutions (horizontal allocation of decision-making competences). This long-term trend strengthens the decision-making competences of government institutions and weakens non-government institutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 105177"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"German centralization strategy during COVID-19: Continuing or interrupting a trend?\",\"authors\":\"Ines Marina Niehaus ,&nbsp;Andreas Lehr ,&nbsp;André Kaiser ,&nbsp;Helena Sophie Müller ,&nbsp;Ludwig Kuntz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries applied centralization strategies to the distribution of power between national government and regional/local governments over responsibility for regulatory tasks. As a result, health-policy decision-making competences were shifted from the regional level to the national level (vertical shift of decision-making competences). This centralization trend for the purpose of infection control is evident in Germany. We conducted a quantitative and qualitative analysis of health-policy regulatory measures (March 2018 to March 2020) in order to investigate whether the vertical shift in decision-making competences was already a trend in Germany before the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond infection control. Our results show that the centralization strategy observed during COVID-19 does not continue a trend. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, what was most important was the distribution of power at national level between government and non-government institutions (horizontal allocation of decision-making competences). This long-term trend strengthens the decision-making competences of government institutions and weakens non-government institutions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"150 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024001878\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024001878","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为应对 COVID-19 大流行病,许多国家在国家政府与地区/地方政府之间分配监管任 务的权力时采用了集中化战略。因此,卫生政策的决策权从地区一级转移到国家一级(决策权的纵向转移)。这种以感染控制为目的的中央集权趋势在德国非常明显。我们对卫生政策监管措施(2018 年 3 月至 2020 年 3 月)进行了定量和定性分析,以调查在 COVID-19 大流行之前,决策权的纵向转移在德国是否已经成为一种趋势,并且超出了感染控制的范围。我们的研究结果表明,在 COVID-19 期间观察到的集中化战略并没有延续这一趋势。在 COVID-19 大流行之前,最重要的是国家层面的权力在政府和非政府机构之间的分配(决策权的横向分配)。这一长期趋势加强了政府机构的决策能力,削弱了非政府机构的决策能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
German centralization strategy during COVID-19: Continuing or interrupting a trend?
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries applied centralization strategies to the distribution of power between national government and regional/local governments over responsibility for regulatory tasks. As a result, health-policy decision-making competences were shifted from the regional level to the national level (vertical shift of decision-making competences). This centralization trend for the purpose of infection control is evident in Germany. We conducted a quantitative and qualitative analysis of health-policy regulatory measures (March 2018 to March 2020) in order to investigate whether the vertical shift in decision-making competences was already a trend in Germany before the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond infection control. Our results show that the centralization strategy observed during COVID-19 does not continue a trend. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, what was most important was the distribution of power at national level between government and non-government institutions (horizontal allocation of decision-making competences). This long-term trend strengthens the decision-making competences of government institutions and weakens non-government institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信