{"title":"全髋关节置换术后患者的室内和室外 10 米步行测试和定时起立行走：可靠性和比较研究。","authors":"Federico Temporiti, Chiara Casirati, Paola Adamo, Davide De Leo, Giorgia Marino, Guido Grappiolo, Roberto Gatti","doi":"10.33393/aop.2024.3267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) and Timed Up and Go (TUG) are valid tools for gait performance and mobility assessment after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The study aimed to assess test-retest reliability of 10MWT and TUG in indoor and outdoor environments in patients in acute phase after THA and compare their indoor vs. outdoor performance during these tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five inpatients performed 10MWT and TUG in indoor and outdoor settings on the second postoperative day. An additional evaluation session was performed after 1 hour under the supervision of the same operator. Test-retest reliability was assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC: 2.1) and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC<sub>95</sub>), while paired t-tests were used to compare indoor vs. outdoor performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Indoor (ICC: 0.94, MDC<sub>95</sub>: 0.13 m/s) and outdoor (ICC: 0.91, MDC<sub>95</sub>: 0.16 m/s) 10MWT at maximum speed and indoor (ICC: 0.92, MDC<sub>95</sub>: 2.5 s) and outdoor (ICC: 0.93, MDC<sub>95</sub>: 2.4 s) TUG revealed excellent reliability. Indoor (ICC: 0.86, MDC<sub>95</sub>: 0.16 m/s) and outdoor (ICC: 0.89, MDC<sub>95</sub>: 0.16 m/s) 10MWT at spontaneous speed revealed good reliability. Spontaneous (mean difference [MD]: 0.05 m/s, 95% confidence interval [CI<sub>95</sub>]: 0.03, 0.07, p < 0.001) and maximum (MD: 0.02 m/s, CI<sub>95</sub>: 0.01, 0.04, p < 0.001) 10MWT revealed higher gait speed when performed outdoors compared to indoors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Indoor and outdoor 10MWT and TUG are reliable tests in acute phase after THA. Higher gait speed during outdoor 10MWT may depend on test score variability, due to MDs being lower than MDC<sub>95</sub>.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indoor and outdoor 10-Meter Walk Test and Timed Up and Go in patients after total hip arthroplasty: a reliability and comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Federico Temporiti, Chiara Casirati, Paola Adamo, Davide De Leo, Giorgia Marino, Guido Grappiolo, Roberto Gatti\",\"doi\":\"10.33393/aop.2024.3267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) and Timed Up and Go (TUG) are valid tools for gait performance and mobility assessment after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The study aimed to assess test-retest reliability of 10MWT and TUG in indoor and outdoor environments in patients in acute phase after THA and compare their indoor vs. outdoor performance during these tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five inpatients performed 10MWT and TUG in indoor and outdoor settings on the second postoperative day. An additional evaluation session was performed after 1 hour under the supervision of the same operator. Test-retest reliability was assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC: 2.1) and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC<sub>95</sub>), while paired t-tests were used to compare indoor vs. outdoor performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Indoor (ICC: 0.94, MDC<sub>95</sub>: 0.13 m/s) and outdoor (ICC: 0.91, MDC<sub>95</sub>: 0.16 m/s) 10MWT at maximum speed and indoor (ICC: 0.92, MDC<sub>95</sub>: 2.5 s) and outdoor (ICC: 0.93, MDC<sub>95</sub>: 2.4 s) TUG revealed excellent reliability. Indoor (ICC: 0.86, MDC<sub>95</sub>: 0.16 m/s) and outdoor (ICC: 0.89, MDC<sub>95</sub>: 0.16 m/s) 10MWT at spontaneous speed revealed good reliability. Spontaneous (mean difference [MD]: 0.05 m/s, 95% confidence interval [CI<sub>95</sub>]: 0.03, 0.07, p < 0.001) and maximum (MD: 0.02 m/s, CI<sub>95</sub>: 0.01, 0.04, p < 0.001) 10MWT revealed higher gait speed when performed outdoors compared to indoors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Indoor and outdoor 10MWT and TUG are reliable tests in acute phase after THA. Higher gait speed during outdoor 10MWT may depend on test score variability, due to MDs being lower than MDC<sub>95</sub>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physiotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538899/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33393/aop.2024.3267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33393/aop.2024.3267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Indoor and outdoor 10-Meter Walk Test and Timed Up and Go in patients after total hip arthroplasty: a reliability and comparative study.
Introduction: The 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) and Timed Up and Go (TUG) are valid tools for gait performance and mobility assessment after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The study aimed to assess test-retest reliability of 10MWT and TUG in indoor and outdoor environments in patients in acute phase after THA and compare their indoor vs. outdoor performance during these tests.
Methods: Thirty-five inpatients performed 10MWT and TUG in indoor and outdoor settings on the second postoperative day. An additional evaluation session was performed after 1 hour under the supervision of the same operator. Test-retest reliability was assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC: 2.1) and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC95), while paired t-tests were used to compare indoor vs. outdoor performance.
Results: Indoor (ICC: 0.94, MDC95: 0.13 m/s) and outdoor (ICC: 0.91, MDC95: 0.16 m/s) 10MWT at maximum speed and indoor (ICC: 0.92, MDC95: 2.5 s) and outdoor (ICC: 0.93, MDC95: 2.4 s) TUG revealed excellent reliability. Indoor (ICC: 0.86, MDC95: 0.16 m/s) and outdoor (ICC: 0.89, MDC95: 0.16 m/s) 10MWT at spontaneous speed revealed good reliability. Spontaneous (mean difference [MD]: 0.05 m/s, 95% confidence interval [CI95]: 0.03, 0.07, p < 0.001) and maximum (MD: 0.02 m/s, CI95: 0.01, 0.04, p < 0.001) 10MWT revealed higher gait speed when performed outdoors compared to indoors.
Conclusions: Indoor and outdoor 10MWT and TUG are reliable tests in acute phase after THA. Higher gait speed during outdoor 10MWT may depend on test score variability, due to MDs being lower than MDC95.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
