股骨远端截骨术后下肢长度不一致对临床效果的影响。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Youngji Kim, Shintaro Onishi, Mitsuaki Kubota, Muneaki Ishijima, Ahmed Mabrouk, Christophe Jacquet, Matthieu Ollivier
{"title":"股骨远端截骨术后下肢长度不一致对临床效果的影响。","authors":"Youngji Kim, Shintaro Onishi, Mitsuaki Kubota, Muneaki Ishijima, Ahmed Mabrouk, Christophe Jacquet, Matthieu Ollivier","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) improves valgus limb alignment. However, it might affect lower limb length discrepancy (LLD) and influence functional scores. This study aims to evaluate functional scores and radiographic parameters associated with LLD after DFO.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>It was hypothesized that the presence of LLD after DFO affects functional scores and associated with femoral length.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 50 patients who underwent DFO, including 24 closed wedge (CW) DFO and 26 open wedge (OW) DFO, were included. Patients were divided into three groups according to the presence of LLD after DFO: LLD-Absent group, LLD-CW group and LLD-OW group. Patient demographics, functional scores (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)), and radiographic parameters were evaluated and compared between the three groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the radiographic parameter associated with the presence of post-operative LLD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between the three groups in demographic data, correction angles, complications including hinge fractures, time to osteotomy union, and functional scores. However, the return to sports (RTS) was significantly different between three groups. By further analysis between CWDFO and OWDFO, RTS in CWDFO was faster than those in OWDFO. There were significant differences in post-operative mLDFA and Δ femur length. Additionally, post-operative mLDFA was significantly associated with the presence of LLD (Odds ratio 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.49, p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Functional scores and postoperative outcomes following DFO are not affected by the presence of LLD. RTS is independent of LLD, but rather dependent on the surgical procedure and RTS in CWDFO was faster than those in OWDFO. Postoperative mLDFA is the radiographic parameter associated with the presence of LLD. These findings are clinically relevant and should be accounted for in preoperative planning of DFO.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iii: </strong>Retrospective with comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence in clinical results of lower limb length discrepancy following distal femoral osteotomy.\",\"authors\":\"Youngji Kim, Shintaro Onishi, Mitsuaki Kubota, Muneaki Ishijima, Ahmed Mabrouk, Christophe Jacquet, Matthieu Ollivier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) improves valgus limb alignment. However, it might affect lower limb length discrepancy (LLD) and influence functional scores. This study aims to evaluate functional scores and radiographic parameters associated with LLD after DFO.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>It was hypothesized that the presence of LLD after DFO affects functional scores and associated with femoral length.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 50 patients who underwent DFO, including 24 closed wedge (CW) DFO and 26 open wedge (OW) DFO, were included. Patients were divided into three groups according to the presence of LLD after DFO: LLD-Absent group, LLD-CW group and LLD-OW group. Patient demographics, functional scores (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)), and radiographic parameters were evaluated and compared between the three groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the radiographic parameter associated with the presence of post-operative LLD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between the three groups in demographic data, correction angles, complications including hinge fractures, time to osteotomy union, and functional scores. However, the return to sports (RTS) was significantly different between three groups. By further analysis between CWDFO and OWDFO, RTS in CWDFO was faster than those in OWDFO. There were significant differences in post-operative mLDFA and Δ femur length. Additionally, post-operative mLDFA was significantly associated with the presence of LLD (Odds ratio 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.49, p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Functional scores and postoperative outcomes following DFO are not affected by the presence of LLD. RTS is independent of LLD, but rather dependent on the surgical procedure and RTS in CWDFO was faster than those in OWDFO. Postoperative mLDFA is the radiographic parameter associated with the presence of LLD. These findings are clinically relevant and should be accounted for in preoperative planning of DFO.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iii: </strong>Retrospective with comparative study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104034\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:股骨远端截骨术(DFO)可改善外翻肢体的对位。然而,它可能会影响下肢长度差异(LLD)并影响功能评分。本研究旨在评估DFO术后与LLD相关的功能评分和影像学参数:假设:DFO术后LLD的存在会影响功能评分,并与股骨长度相关:共纳入 50 例接受 DFO 的患者,包括 24 例闭合楔形 (CW) DFO 和 26 例开放楔形 (OW) DFO。根据 DFO 后是否出现 LLD 将患者分为三组:无 LLD 组、LLD-CW 组和 LLD-OW 组。对三组患者的人口统计学特征、功能评分(膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS))和影像学参数进行评估和比较。采用多变量逻辑回归分析评估与术后 LLD 存在相关的影像学参数:结果:三组患者在人口统计学数据、矫正角度、包括铰链骨折在内的并发症、截骨结合时间和功能评分方面均无明显差异。但是,三组患者的运动恢复能力(RTS)有显著差异。通过对CWDFO和OWDFO的进一步分析,CWDFO的恢复运动时间比OWDFO快。术后 mLDFA 和 Δ 股骨长度有明显差异。此外,术后 mLDFA 与 LLD 的存在显著相关(Odds ratio 0.11,95% CI 0.01 至 0.49,p = 0.03):结论:DFO术后的功能评分和术后结果不受LLD的影响。RTS与LLD无关,而是取决于手术方法,CWDFO患者的RTS快于OWDFO患者。术后 mLDFA 是与 LLD 存在相关的放射学参数。这些发现与临床相关,应在DFO的术前计划中加以考虑:证据等级:Ⅲ;回顾性对比研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence in clinical results of lower limb length discrepancy following distal femoral osteotomy.

Background: Distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) improves valgus limb alignment. However, it might affect lower limb length discrepancy (LLD) and influence functional scores. This study aims to evaluate functional scores and radiographic parameters associated with LLD after DFO.

Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that the presence of LLD after DFO affects functional scores and associated with femoral length.

Patients and methods: A total of 50 patients who underwent DFO, including 24 closed wedge (CW) DFO and 26 open wedge (OW) DFO, were included. Patients were divided into three groups according to the presence of LLD after DFO: LLD-Absent group, LLD-CW group and LLD-OW group. Patient demographics, functional scores (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)), and radiographic parameters were evaluated and compared between the three groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the radiographic parameter associated with the presence of post-operative LLD.

Results: There were no significant differences between the three groups in demographic data, correction angles, complications including hinge fractures, time to osteotomy union, and functional scores. However, the return to sports (RTS) was significantly different between three groups. By further analysis between CWDFO and OWDFO, RTS in CWDFO was faster than those in OWDFO. There were significant differences in post-operative mLDFA and Δ femur length. Additionally, post-operative mLDFA was significantly associated with the presence of LLD (Odds ratio 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.49, p = 0.03).

Conclusion: Functional scores and postoperative outcomes following DFO are not affected by the presence of LLD. RTS is independent of LLD, but rather dependent on the surgical procedure and RTS in CWDFO was faster than those in OWDFO. Postoperative mLDFA is the radiographic parameter associated with the presence of LLD. These findings are clinically relevant and should be accounted for in preoperative planning of DFO.

Level of evidence iii: Retrospective with comparative study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信