后处理程序对生物相容性 3D 打印树脂的影响。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Sergio López-García, Miguel Ramón Pecci-Lloret, María Pilar Pecci-Lloret, David García-Bernal, Ricardo Elías Oñate-Sánchez
{"title":"后处理程序对生物相容性 3D 打印树脂的影响。","authors":"Sergio López-García, Miguel Ramón Pecci-Lloret, María Pilar Pecci-Lloret, David García-Bernal, Ricardo Elías Oñate-Sánchez","doi":"10.1111/jopr.13980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of a biocompatible 3D-printed resin material for occlusal devices after post-processing with two different high-intensity UV-polymerization devices and two rinsing solvents, in the presence of human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Sample discs from the 3D-printed resin material were printed (2 mm in height and 6 mm in diameter [N = 40]) and divided into 4 groups (n = 10) based on post-processing methods: a high-intensity UV polymerization device with isopropyl alcohol, a high-intensity UV polymerization device with a modified glycol solvent, a UV cleaning and curing unit with isopropyl alcohol, a UV cleaning and curing unit with a modified glycol solvent, and a control group cultured in DMEM medium. Different tests were performed to evaluate their cytocompatibility on HGFs: MTT assay, cell migration assay, cell cytoskeleton staining, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and cell apoptosis and generation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS). Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc test (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cytocompatibility, MTT assay, cell migration assay, cell cytoskeleton staining, and SEM images were similar, regardless of the post-processing protocol, compared with the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No differences were found in the cytotoxicity of the 3D-printed resin material for occlusal devices after the following post-processing methods: two different UV-polymerization devices and two rinsing solvents (isopropyl alcohol and a modified glycol solvent).</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of the post-processing protocol on a biocompatible 3D-printed resin.\",\"authors\":\"Sergio López-García, Miguel Ramón Pecci-Lloret, María Pilar Pecci-Lloret, David García-Bernal, Ricardo Elías Oñate-Sánchez\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jopr.13980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of a biocompatible 3D-printed resin material for occlusal devices after post-processing with two different high-intensity UV-polymerization devices and two rinsing solvents, in the presence of human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Sample discs from the 3D-printed resin material were printed (2 mm in height and 6 mm in diameter [N = 40]) and divided into 4 groups (n = 10) based on post-processing methods: a high-intensity UV polymerization device with isopropyl alcohol, a high-intensity UV polymerization device with a modified glycol solvent, a UV cleaning and curing unit with isopropyl alcohol, a UV cleaning and curing unit with a modified glycol solvent, and a control group cultured in DMEM medium. Different tests were performed to evaluate their cytocompatibility on HGFs: MTT assay, cell migration assay, cell cytoskeleton staining, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and cell apoptosis and generation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS). Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc test (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cytocompatibility, MTT assay, cell migration assay, cell cytoskeleton staining, and SEM images were similar, regardless of the post-processing protocol, compared with the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No differences were found in the cytotoxicity of the 3D-printed resin material for occlusal devices after the following post-processing methods: two different UV-polymerization devices and two rinsing solvents (isopropyl alcohol and a modified glycol solvent).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13980\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13980","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估一种用于咬合器械的生物相容性三维打印树脂材料在使用两种不同的高强度紫外线聚合设备和两种漂洗溶剂进行后处理后,在人牙龈成纤维细胞(HGFs)存在的情况下的细胞毒性:用三维打印树脂材料打印样品盘(高 2 毫米,直径 6 毫米[N = 40]),并根据后处理方法分为 4 组(n = 10):使用异丙醇的高强度紫外线聚合装置、使用改性乙二醇溶剂的高强度紫外线聚合装置、使用异丙醇的紫外线清洗和固化装置、使用改性乙二醇溶剂的紫外线清洗和固化装置,以及在 DMEM 培养基中培养的对照组。为评估它们对 HGFs 的细胞相容性,进行了不同的测试:分别进行了 MTT 试验、细胞迁移试验、细胞骨架染色、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、细胞凋亡和细胞内活性氧(ROS)的生成。统计分析采用单因素方差分析和 Tukey 后检验(α = 0.05):结果:与对照组相比,无论后处理方案如何,细胞相容性、MTT 试验、细胞迁移试验、细胞细胞骨架染色和扫描电镜图像均相似:在采用以下后处理方法(两种不同的紫外线聚合装置和两种漂洗溶剂(异丙醇和改性乙二醇溶剂))后,用于咬合装置的三维打印树脂材料的细胞毒性没有发现差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of the post-processing protocol on a biocompatible 3D-printed resin.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of a biocompatible 3D-printed resin material for occlusal devices after post-processing with two different high-intensity UV-polymerization devices and two rinsing solvents, in the presence of human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs).

Material and methods: Sample discs from the 3D-printed resin material were printed (2 mm in height and 6 mm in diameter [N = 40]) and divided into 4 groups (n = 10) based on post-processing methods: a high-intensity UV polymerization device with isopropyl alcohol, a high-intensity UV polymerization device with a modified glycol solvent, a UV cleaning and curing unit with isopropyl alcohol, a UV cleaning and curing unit with a modified glycol solvent, and a control group cultured in DMEM medium. Different tests were performed to evaluate their cytocompatibility on HGFs: MTT assay, cell migration assay, cell cytoskeleton staining, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and cell apoptosis and generation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS). Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc test (α = 0.05).

Results: Cytocompatibility, MTT assay, cell migration assay, cell cytoskeleton staining, and SEM images were similar, regardless of the post-processing protocol, compared with the control group.

Conclusions: No differences were found in the cytotoxicity of the 3D-printed resin material for occlusal devices after the following post-processing methods: two different UV-polymerization devices and two rinsing solvents (isopropyl alcohol and a modified glycol solvent).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信