对于髋关节骨性关节炎疼痛患者,在超声引导下还是在透视引导下进行关节腔内皮质类固醇注射对缓解症状更有益?系统回顾与网络元分析》。

IF 1.6 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Peter Alan Brookes, Siobhan Stynes
{"title":"对于髋关节骨性关节炎疼痛患者,在超声引导下还是在透视引导下进行关节腔内皮质类固醇注射对缓解症状更有益?系统回顾与网络元分析》。","authors":"Peter Alan Brookes, Siobhan Stynes","doi":"10.1002/msc.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a common disabling musculoskeletal condition. Clinical guidelines recommend intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACSI) as a pharmacological adjunct to help manage pain. IACSI are typically image-guided either by ultrasound guidance (USG) or fluoroscopic guidance (FG) with no clear evidence towards the more efficacious guidance technique. This study aims to systematically review the scientific literature to determine the clinical effectiveness of USG compared with FG-IACSIs for people with pain-related hip OA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of major bibliographic databases from inception to 24 August 2023 was conducted. Randomised controlled trials of USG- and FG-IACSIs for patients with hip OA were included. The primary outcome measure was pain. Hedges' g calculated effect size and meta-analysis using the random-effects model-estimated pooled effect sizes. τ<sup>2</sup>, I<sup>2</sup> and Cochran's Q calculated heterogeneity. Network meta-analysis was completed to indirectly compare effect sizes. Quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1464 citations were identified; eight studies were included in the review. No studies directly compared imaging modalities. Two network meta-analyses indirectly comparing USG- to FG-IACSI via an image-guided comparator hip injection ([any comparator], [local anaesthetic or saline]) established effect sizes (g) of 2.61 and 2.46, respectively, both in favour of FG-IACSI. Heterogeneity was low in the USG studies and high in the FG studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>Evidence suggests that both USG and FG-IACSI are effective at reducing pain at 1 month in patients with painful hip OA. Although network meta-analyses favoured FG-IACSI, further high-quality trials are needed to determine the preferred guidance technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":46945,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Care","volume":"22 4","pages":"e70005"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Patients With Painful Hip Osteoarthritis, Is It More Beneficial to Offer Them an Ultrasound-Guided or a Fluoroscopic-Guided Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injection to Relieve Their Symptoms? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Alan Brookes, Siobhan Stynes\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/msc.70005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a common disabling musculoskeletal condition. Clinical guidelines recommend intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACSI) as a pharmacological adjunct to help manage pain. IACSI are typically image-guided either by ultrasound guidance (USG) or fluoroscopic guidance (FG) with no clear evidence towards the more efficacious guidance technique. This study aims to systematically review the scientific literature to determine the clinical effectiveness of USG compared with FG-IACSIs for people with pain-related hip OA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of major bibliographic databases from inception to 24 August 2023 was conducted. Randomised controlled trials of USG- and FG-IACSIs for patients with hip OA were included. The primary outcome measure was pain. Hedges' g calculated effect size and meta-analysis using the random-effects model-estimated pooled effect sizes. τ<sup>2</sup>, I<sup>2</sup> and Cochran's Q calculated heterogeneity. Network meta-analysis was completed to indirectly compare effect sizes. Quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1464 citations were identified; eight studies were included in the review. No studies directly compared imaging modalities. Two network meta-analyses indirectly comparing USG- to FG-IACSI via an image-guided comparator hip injection ([any comparator], [local anaesthetic or saline]) established effect sizes (g) of 2.61 and 2.46, respectively, both in favour of FG-IACSI. Heterogeneity was low in the USG studies and high in the FG studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>Evidence suggests that both USG and FG-IACSI are effective at reducing pain at 1 month in patients with painful hip OA. Although network meta-analyses favoured FG-IACSI, further high-quality trials are needed to determine the preferred guidance technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Musculoskeletal Care\",\"volume\":\"22 4\",\"pages\":\"e70005\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Musculoskeletal Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:髋关节骨关节炎(OA)是一种常见的致残性肌肉骨骼疾病。临床指南建议将关节内皮质类固醇注射(IACSI)作为一种药物辅助治疗方法,以帮助控制疼痛。IACSI 通常通过超声引导(USG)或透视引导(FG)进行图像引导,但没有明确证据表明哪种引导技术更有效。本研究旨在系统回顾科学文献,以确定 USG 与 FG-IACSI 对疼痛相关髋关节 OA 患者的临床疗效:方法:对从开始到 2023 年 8 月 24 日的主要文献数据库进行了系统性回顾。研究纳入了针对髋关节 OA 患者的 USG 和 FG-IACSI 随机对照试验。主要结果指标为疼痛。Hedges'g计算效应大小,使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,估计汇集效应大小。网络荟萃分析用于间接比较效应大小。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具(RoB2)对研究质量进行评估:结果:共发现 1464 条引文,其中 8 项研究被纳入综述。没有研究对成像模式进行直接比较。两项网络荟萃分析间接比较了 USG 与 FG-IACSI 通过图像引导的比较者髋关节注射([任何比较者]、[局麻药或生理盐水]),得出的效应量(g)分别为 2.61 和 2.46,均支持 FG-IACSI。USG研究的异质性较低,FG研究的异质性较高:有证据表明,USG 和 FG-IACSI 均能有效减轻髋关节 OA 疼痛患者 1 个月后的疼痛。尽管网络荟萃分析更倾向于 FG-IACSI,但仍需要进一步的高质量试验来确定首选的引导技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Patients With Painful Hip Osteoarthritis, Is It More Beneficial to Offer Them an Ultrasound-Guided or a Fluoroscopic-Guided Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injection to Relieve Their Symptoms? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Purpose: Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a common disabling musculoskeletal condition. Clinical guidelines recommend intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACSI) as a pharmacological adjunct to help manage pain. IACSI are typically image-guided either by ultrasound guidance (USG) or fluoroscopic guidance (FG) with no clear evidence towards the more efficacious guidance technique. This study aims to systematically review the scientific literature to determine the clinical effectiveness of USG compared with FG-IACSIs for people with pain-related hip OA.

Methods: A systematic review of major bibliographic databases from inception to 24 August 2023 was conducted. Randomised controlled trials of USG- and FG-IACSIs for patients with hip OA were included. The primary outcome measure was pain. Hedges' g calculated effect size and meta-analysis using the random-effects model-estimated pooled effect sizes. τ2, I2 and Cochran's Q calculated heterogeneity. Network meta-analysis was completed to indirectly compare effect sizes. Quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB2).

Results: A total of 1464 citations were identified; eight studies were included in the review. No studies directly compared imaging modalities. Two network meta-analyses indirectly comparing USG- to FG-IACSI via an image-guided comparator hip injection ([any comparator], [local anaesthetic or saline]) established effect sizes (g) of 2.61 and 2.46, respectively, both in favour of FG-IACSI. Heterogeneity was low in the USG studies and high in the FG studies.

Conclusion(s): Evidence suggests that both USG and FG-IACSI are effective at reducing pain at 1 month in patients with painful hip OA. Although network meta-analyses favoured FG-IACSI, further high-quality trials are needed to determine the preferred guidance technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Care
Musculoskeletal Care RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Care is a peer-reviewed journal for all health professionals committed to the clinical delivery of high quality care for people with musculoskeletal conditions and providing knowledge to support decision making by professionals, patients and policy makers. This journal publishes papers on original research, applied research, review articles and clinical guidelines. Regular topics include patient education, psychological and social impact, patient experiences of health care, clinical up dates and the effectiveness of therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信