{"title":"对于髋关节骨性关节炎疼痛患者,在超声引导下还是在透视引导下进行关节腔内皮质类固醇注射对缓解症状更有益?系统回顾与网络元分析》。","authors":"Peter Alan Brookes, Siobhan Stynes","doi":"10.1002/msc.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a common disabling musculoskeletal condition. Clinical guidelines recommend intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACSI) as a pharmacological adjunct to help manage pain. IACSI are typically image-guided either by ultrasound guidance (USG) or fluoroscopic guidance (FG) with no clear evidence towards the more efficacious guidance technique. This study aims to systematically review the scientific literature to determine the clinical effectiveness of USG compared with FG-IACSIs for people with pain-related hip OA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of major bibliographic databases from inception to 24 August 2023 was conducted. Randomised controlled trials of USG- and FG-IACSIs for patients with hip OA were included. The primary outcome measure was pain. Hedges' g calculated effect size and meta-analysis using the random-effects model-estimated pooled effect sizes. τ<sup>2</sup>, I<sup>2</sup> and Cochran's Q calculated heterogeneity. Network meta-analysis was completed to indirectly compare effect sizes. Quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1464 citations were identified; eight studies were included in the review. No studies directly compared imaging modalities. Two network meta-analyses indirectly comparing USG- to FG-IACSI via an image-guided comparator hip injection ([any comparator], [local anaesthetic or saline]) established effect sizes (g) of 2.61 and 2.46, respectively, both in favour of FG-IACSI. Heterogeneity was low in the USG studies and high in the FG studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>Evidence suggests that both USG and FG-IACSI are effective at reducing pain at 1 month in patients with painful hip OA. Although network meta-analyses favoured FG-IACSI, further high-quality trials are needed to determine the preferred guidance technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":46945,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Care","volume":"22 4","pages":"e70005"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Patients With Painful Hip Osteoarthritis, Is It More Beneficial to Offer Them an Ultrasound-Guided or a Fluoroscopic-Guided Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injection to Relieve Their Symptoms? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Alan Brookes, Siobhan Stynes\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/msc.70005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a common disabling musculoskeletal condition. Clinical guidelines recommend intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACSI) as a pharmacological adjunct to help manage pain. IACSI are typically image-guided either by ultrasound guidance (USG) or fluoroscopic guidance (FG) with no clear evidence towards the more efficacious guidance technique. This study aims to systematically review the scientific literature to determine the clinical effectiveness of USG compared with FG-IACSIs for people with pain-related hip OA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of major bibliographic databases from inception to 24 August 2023 was conducted. Randomised controlled trials of USG- and FG-IACSIs for patients with hip OA were included. The primary outcome measure was pain. Hedges' g calculated effect size and meta-analysis using the random-effects model-estimated pooled effect sizes. τ<sup>2</sup>, I<sup>2</sup> and Cochran's Q calculated heterogeneity. Network meta-analysis was completed to indirectly compare effect sizes. Quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1464 citations were identified; eight studies were included in the review. No studies directly compared imaging modalities. Two network meta-analyses indirectly comparing USG- to FG-IACSI via an image-guided comparator hip injection ([any comparator], [local anaesthetic or saline]) established effect sizes (g) of 2.61 and 2.46, respectively, both in favour of FG-IACSI. Heterogeneity was low in the USG studies and high in the FG studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>Evidence suggests that both USG and FG-IACSI are effective at reducing pain at 1 month in patients with painful hip OA. Although network meta-analyses favoured FG-IACSI, further high-quality trials are needed to determine the preferred guidance technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Musculoskeletal Care\",\"volume\":\"22 4\",\"pages\":\"e70005\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Musculoskeletal Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
In Patients With Painful Hip Osteoarthritis, Is It More Beneficial to Offer Them an Ultrasound-Guided or a Fluoroscopic-Guided Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injection to Relieve Their Symptoms? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Purpose: Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a common disabling musculoskeletal condition. Clinical guidelines recommend intra-articular corticosteroid injections (IACSI) as a pharmacological adjunct to help manage pain. IACSI are typically image-guided either by ultrasound guidance (USG) or fluoroscopic guidance (FG) with no clear evidence towards the more efficacious guidance technique. This study aims to systematically review the scientific literature to determine the clinical effectiveness of USG compared with FG-IACSIs for people with pain-related hip OA.
Methods: A systematic review of major bibliographic databases from inception to 24 August 2023 was conducted. Randomised controlled trials of USG- and FG-IACSIs for patients with hip OA were included. The primary outcome measure was pain. Hedges' g calculated effect size and meta-analysis using the random-effects model-estimated pooled effect sizes. τ2, I2 and Cochran's Q calculated heterogeneity. Network meta-analysis was completed to indirectly compare effect sizes. Quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB2).
Results: A total of 1464 citations were identified; eight studies were included in the review. No studies directly compared imaging modalities. Two network meta-analyses indirectly comparing USG- to FG-IACSI via an image-guided comparator hip injection ([any comparator], [local anaesthetic or saline]) established effect sizes (g) of 2.61 and 2.46, respectively, both in favour of FG-IACSI. Heterogeneity was low in the USG studies and high in the FG studies.
Conclusion(s): Evidence suggests that both USG and FG-IACSI are effective at reducing pain at 1 month in patients with painful hip OA. Although network meta-analyses favoured FG-IACSI, further high-quality trials are needed to determine the preferred guidance technique.
期刊介绍:
Musculoskeletal Care is a peer-reviewed journal for all health professionals committed to the clinical delivery of high quality care for people with musculoskeletal conditions and providing knowledge to support decision making by professionals, patients and policy makers. This journal publishes papers on original research, applied research, review articles and clinical guidelines. Regular topics include patient education, psychological and social impact, patient experiences of health care, clinical up dates and the effectiveness of therapy.