以疾病为重点的电子健康记录仪表板对门诊肺动脉高压护理诊所临床人员预诊患者审查效率的影响。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1790552
Tapendra Koirala, Charles D Burger, Rajeev Chaudhry, Patricia Benitez, Heather A Heaton, Nilaa Gopikrishnan, Scott A Helgeson
{"title":"以疾病为重点的电子健康记录仪表板对门诊肺动脉高压护理诊所临床人员预诊患者审查效率的影响。","authors":"Tapendra Koirala, Charles D Burger, Rajeev Chaudhry, Patricia Benitez, Heather A Heaton, Nilaa Gopikrishnan, Scott A Helgeson","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1790552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong> We aimed to improve the operational efficiency of clinical staff, including physicians and allied health professionals, in the previsit review of patients by implementing a disease-focused dashboard within the electronic health record system. The dashboard was tailored to the unique requirements of the clinic and patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A prospective quality improvement study was conducted at an accredited pulmonary hypertension (PH) clinic within a large academic center, staffed by two full time physicians and two allied health professionals. Physicians' review time before and after implementation of the PH dashboard was measured using activity log data derived from an EHR database. The review time for clinic staff was measured through direct observation, with review method-either conventional or newly implemented dashboard-randomly assigned.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Over the study period, the median number of patients reviewed by physicians per day increased slightly from 5.50 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.35) before to 5.95 (IQR: 0.85) after the implementation of the PH dashboard (<i>p</i> = 0.535). The median review time for the physicians decreased with the use of the dashboard, from 7.0 minutes (IQR: 1.55) to 4.95 minutes (IQR: 1.35; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Based on the observed timing of 70 patient encounters among allied clinical staff, no significant difference was found for experienced members (4.65 minutes [IQR: 2.02] vs. 4.43 minutes [IQR: 0.69], <i>p</i> = 0.752), while inexperienced staff saw a significant reduction in review time after familiarization with the dashboard (5.06 minutes [IQR: 1.51] vs. 4.12 minutes [IQR: 1.99], <i>p</i> = 0.034). Subjective feedback highlighted the need for further optimization of the dashboard to align with the workflow of allied health staff to achieve similar efficiency benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> A disease-focused dashboard significantly reduced physician previsit review time while that for clinic staff remained unchanged. Validation studies are necessary with our patient populations to explore further qualitative impacts on patient care efficiency and long-term benefits on workflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":"15 5","pages":"928-938"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a Disease-Focused Electronic Health Record Dashboard on Clinical Staff Efficiency in Previsit Patient Review in an Ambulatory Pulmonary Hypertension Care Clinic.\",\"authors\":\"Tapendra Koirala, Charles D Burger, Rajeev Chaudhry, Patricia Benitez, Heather A Heaton, Nilaa Gopikrishnan, Scott A Helgeson\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1790552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong> We aimed to improve the operational efficiency of clinical staff, including physicians and allied health professionals, in the previsit review of patients by implementing a disease-focused dashboard within the electronic health record system. The dashboard was tailored to the unique requirements of the clinic and patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A prospective quality improvement study was conducted at an accredited pulmonary hypertension (PH) clinic within a large academic center, staffed by two full time physicians and two allied health professionals. Physicians' review time before and after implementation of the PH dashboard was measured using activity log data derived from an EHR database. The review time for clinic staff was measured through direct observation, with review method-either conventional or newly implemented dashboard-randomly assigned.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Over the study period, the median number of patients reviewed by physicians per day increased slightly from 5.50 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.35) before to 5.95 (IQR: 0.85) after the implementation of the PH dashboard (<i>p</i> = 0.535). The median review time for the physicians decreased with the use of the dashboard, from 7.0 minutes (IQR: 1.55) to 4.95 minutes (IQR: 1.35; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Based on the observed timing of 70 patient encounters among allied clinical staff, no significant difference was found for experienced members (4.65 minutes [IQR: 2.02] vs. 4.43 minutes [IQR: 0.69], <i>p</i> = 0.752), while inexperienced staff saw a significant reduction in review time after familiarization with the dashboard (5.06 minutes [IQR: 1.51] vs. 4.12 minutes [IQR: 1.99], <i>p</i> = 0.034). Subjective feedback highlighted the need for further optimization of the dashboard to align with the workflow of allied health staff to achieve similar efficiency benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> A disease-focused dashboard significantly reduced physician previsit review time while that for clinic staff remained unchanged. Validation studies are necessary with our patient populations to explore further qualitative impacts on patient care efficiency and long-term benefits on workflow.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"928-938\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540472/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1790552\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1790552","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:我们旨在通过在电子健康记录系统中实施以疾病为重点的仪表板,提高临床工作人员(包括医生和专职医疗人员)在对患者进行诊前检查时的操作效率。该仪表板是根据诊所和患者群体的独特需求量身定制的:方法:一项前瞻性质量改进研究在一家大型学术中心的认可肺动脉高压(PH)诊所进行,该诊所由两名全职医生和两名专职医疗人员组成。使用从电子病历数据库中提取的活动日志数据,对实施 PH 面板前后医生的复查时间进行了测量。诊所工作人员的复查时间则通过直接观察进行测量,复查方法为随机分配的传统方法或新实施的仪表板:结果:在研究期间,医生每天复查病人数的中位数略有增加,从实施 PH 面板前的 5.50(四分位数间距 [IQR]:1.35)增加到实施 PH 面板后的 5.95(四分位数间距 [IQR]:0.85)(p = 0.535)。使用仪表板后,医生审查时间的中位数从 7.0 分钟(IQR:1.55)减少到 4.95 分钟(IQR:1.35;p = 0.752),而缺乏经验的员工在熟悉仪表板后审查时间显著减少(5.06 分钟 [IQR: 1.51] vs. 4.12 分钟 [IQR: 1.99],p = 0.034)。主观反馈强调需要进一步优化仪表板,使其符合专职医疗人员的工作流程,以实现类似的效率效益:结论:以疾病为重点的仪表板大大缩短了医生的诊前审查时间,而诊所员工的时间则保持不变。有必要对我们的患者群体进行验证研究,以探索对患者护理效率的进一步定性影响以及对工作流程的长期益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of a Disease-Focused Electronic Health Record Dashboard on Clinical Staff Efficiency in Previsit Patient Review in an Ambulatory Pulmonary Hypertension Care Clinic.

Objectives:  We aimed to improve the operational efficiency of clinical staff, including physicians and allied health professionals, in the previsit review of patients by implementing a disease-focused dashboard within the electronic health record system. The dashboard was tailored to the unique requirements of the clinic and patient population.

Methods:  A prospective quality improvement study was conducted at an accredited pulmonary hypertension (PH) clinic within a large academic center, staffed by two full time physicians and two allied health professionals. Physicians' review time before and after implementation of the PH dashboard was measured using activity log data derived from an EHR database. The review time for clinic staff was measured through direct observation, with review method-either conventional or newly implemented dashboard-randomly assigned.

Results:  Over the study period, the median number of patients reviewed by physicians per day increased slightly from 5.50 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.35) before to 5.95 (IQR: 0.85) after the implementation of the PH dashboard (p = 0.535). The median review time for the physicians decreased with the use of the dashboard, from 7.0 minutes (IQR: 1.55) to 4.95 minutes (IQR: 1.35; p < 0.001). Based on the observed timing of 70 patient encounters among allied clinical staff, no significant difference was found for experienced members (4.65 minutes [IQR: 2.02] vs. 4.43 minutes [IQR: 0.69], p = 0.752), while inexperienced staff saw a significant reduction in review time after familiarization with the dashboard (5.06 minutes [IQR: 1.51] vs. 4.12 minutes [IQR: 1.99], p = 0.034). Subjective feedback highlighted the need for further optimization of the dashboard to align with the workflow of allied health staff to achieve similar efficiency benefits.

Conclusion:  A disease-focused dashboard significantly reduced physician previsit review time while that for clinic staff remained unchanged. Validation studies are necessary with our patient populations to explore further qualitative impacts on patient care efficiency and long-term benefits on workflow.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信