在数字导航员、心理健康专业人员和客户之间建立互利合作关系:自然观察案例研究。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Jmir Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.2196/58068
Carla Gorban, Sarah McKenna, Min K Chong, William Capon, Robert Battisti, Alison Crowley, Bradley Whitwell, Antonia Ottavio, Elizabeth M Scott, Ian B Hickie, Frank Iorfino
{"title":"在数字导航员、心理健康专业人员和客户之间建立互利合作关系:自然观察案例研究。","authors":"Carla Gorban, Sarah McKenna, Min K Chong, William Capon, Robert Battisti, Alison Crowley, Bradley Whitwell, Antonia Ottavio, Elizabeth M Scott, Ian B Hickie, Frank Iorfino","doi":"10.2196/58068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Despite the efficacy of digital mental health technologies (DMHTs) in clinical trials, low uptake and poor engagement are common in real-world settings. Accordingly, digital technology experts or \"digital navigators\" are increasingly being used to enhance engagement and shared decision-making between health professionals and clients. However, this area is relatively underexplored and there is a lack of data from naturalistic settings. In this paper, we report observational findings from the implementation of a digital navigator in a multidisciplinary mental health clinic in Sydney, Australia. The digital navigator supported clients and health professionals to use a measurement-based DMHT (the Innowell platform) for improved multidimensional outcome assessment and to guide personalized decision-making. Observational data are reported from implementation logs, platform usage statistics, and response rates to digital navigator emails and phone calls. Ultimately, support from the digital navigator led to improved data collection and clearer communications about goals for using the DMHT to track client outcomes; however, this required strong partnerships between health professionals, the digital navigator, and clients. The digital navigator helped to facilitate the integration of DMHT into care, rather than providing a stand-alone service. Thus, collaborations between health professionals and digital navigators are mutually beneficial and empower clients to be more engaged in their own care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48616,"journal":{"name":"Jmir Mental Health","volume":"11 ","pages":"e58068"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building Mutually Beneficial Collaborations Between Digital Navigators, Mental Health Professionals, and Clients: Naturalistic Observational Case Study.\",\"authors\":\"Carla Gorban, Sarah McKenna, Min K Chong, William Capon, Robert Battisti, Alison Crowley, Bradley Whitwell, Antonia Ottavio, Elizabeth M Scott, Ian B Hickie, Frank Iorfino\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/58068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Despite the efficacy of digital mental health technologies (DMHTs) in clinical trials, low uptake and poor engagement are common in real-world settings. Accordingly, digital technology experts or \\\"digital navigators\\\" are increasingly being used to enhance engagement and shared decision-making between health professionals and clients. However, this area is relatively underexplored and there is a lack of data from naturalistic settings. In this paper, we report observational findings from the implementation of a digital navigator in a multidisciplinary mental health clinic in Sydney, Australia. The digital navigator supported clients and health professionals to use a measurement-based DMHT (the Innowell platform) for improved multidimensional outcome assessment and to guide personalized decision-making. Observational data are reported from implementation logs, platform usage statistics, and response rates to digital navigator emails and phone calls. Ultimately, support from the digital navigator led to improved data collection and clearer communications about goals for using the DMHT to track client outcomes; however, this required strong partnerships between health professionals, the digital navigator, and clients. The digital navigator helped to facilitate the integration of DMHT into care, rather than providing a stand-alone service. Thus, collaborations between health professionals and digital navigators are mutually beneficial and empower clients to be more engaged in their own care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jmir Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"e58068\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559438/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jmir Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/58068\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jmir Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/58068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无标签:尽管数字心理健康技术(DMHTs)在临床试验中取得了很好的效果,但在现实环境中却普遍存在使用率低和参与度低的问题。因此,人们越来越多地使用数字技术专家或 "数字导航员 "来加强医疗专业人员和客户之间的参与和共同决策。然而,这一领域的研究相对不足,也缺乏来自自然环境的数据。在本文中,我们报告了在澳大利亚悉尼一家多学科心理健康诊所实施数字导航仪的观察结果。数字导航仪支持客户和医疗专业人员使用基于测量的 DMHT(Innowell 平台)来改进多维结果评估,并指导个性化决策。观察数据来自实施日志、平台使用统计以及对数字导航员电子邮件和电话的回复率。最终,在数字导航员的支持下,数据收集工作得到了改善,使用 DMHT 跟踪客户结果的目标也得到了更清晰的沟通;不过,这需要医疗专业人员、数字导航员和客户之间建立牢固的合作关系。数字导航员有助于促进将 DMHT 与护理工作相结合,而不是提供一项独立的服务。因此,医疗专业人员与数字导航员之间的合作是互惠互利的,能让客户更多地参与到自己的护理中来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Building Mutually Beneficial Collaborations Between Digital Navigators, Mental Health Professionals, and Clients: Naturalistic Observational Case Study.

Unlabelled: Despite the efficacy of digital mental health technologies (DMHTs) in clinical trials, low uptake and poor engagement are common in real-world settings. Accordingly, digital technology experts or "digital navigators" are increasingly being used to enhance engagement and shared decision-making between health professionals and clients. However, this area is relatively underexplored and there is a lack of data from naturalistic settings. In this paper, we report observational findings from the implementation of a digital navigator in a multidisciplinary mental health clinic in Sydney, Australia. The digital navigator supported clients and health professionals to use a measurement-based DMHT (the Innowell platform) for improved multidimensional outcome assessment and to guide personalized decision-making. Observational data are reported from implementation logs, platform usage statistics, and response rates to digital navigator emails and phone calls. Ultimately, support from the digital navigator led to improved data collection and clearer communications about goals for using the DMHT to track client outcomes; however, this required strong partnerships between health professionals, the digital navigator, and clients. The digital navigator helped to facilitate the integration of DMHT into care, rather than providing a stand-alone service. Thus, collaborations between health professionals and digital navigators are mutually beneficial and empower clients to be more engaged in their own care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jmir Mental Health
Jmir Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
104
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Mental Health (JMH, ISSN 2368-7959) is a PubMed-indexed, peer-reviewed sister journal of JMIR, the leading eHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175). JMIR Mental Health focusses on digital health and Internet interventions, technologies and electronic innovations (software and hardware) for mental health, addictions, online counselling and behaviour change. This includes formative evaluation and system descriptions, theoretical papers, review papers, viewpoint/vision papers, and rigorous evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信