作为神经病理学诊断支持工具的大型语言模型。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Katherine J Hewitt, Isabella C Wiest, Zunamys I Carrero, Laura Bejan, Thomas O Millner, Sebastian Brandner, Jakob Nikolas Kather
{"title":"作为神经病理学诊断支持工具的大型语言模型。","authors":"Katherine J Hewitt, Isabella C Wiest, Zunamys I Carrero, Laura Bejan, Thomas O Millner, Sebastian Brandner, Jakob Nikolas Kather","doi":"10.1002/2056-4538.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The WHO guidelines for classifying central nervous system (CNS) tumours are changing considerably with each release. The classification of CNS tumours is uniquely complex among most other solid tumours as it incorporates not just morphology, but also genetic and epigenetic features. Keeping current with these changes across medical fields can be challenging, even for clinical specialists. Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated their ability to parse and process complex medical text, but their utility in neuro-oncology has not been systematically tested. We hypothesised that LLMs can effectively diagnose neuro-oncology cases from free-text histopathology reports according to the latest WHO guidelines. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated the performance of ChatGPT-4o, Claude-3.5-sonnet, and Llama3 across 30 challenging neuropathology cases, which each presented a complex mix of morphological and genetic information relevant to the diagnosis. Furthermore, we integrated these models with the latest WHO guidelines through Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and again assessed their diagnostic accuracy. Our data show that LLMs equipped with RAG, but not without RAG, can accurately diagnose the neuropathological tumour subtype in 90% of the tested cases. This study lays the groundwork for a new generation of computational tools that can assist neuropathologists in their daily reporting practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large language models as a diagnostic support tool in neuropathology.\",\"authors\":\"Katherine J Hewitt, Isabella C Wiest, Zunamys I Carrero, Laura Bejan, Thomas O Millner, Sebastian Brandner, Jakob Nikolas Kather\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/2056-4538.70009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The WHO guidelines for classifying central nervous system (CNS) tumours are changing considerably with each release. The classification of CNS tumours is uniquely complex among most other solid tumours as it incorporates not just morphology, but also genetic and epigenetic features. Keeping current with these changes across medical fields can be challenging, even for clinical specialists. Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated their ability to parse and process complex medical text, but their utility in neuro-oncology has not been systematically tested. We hypothesised that LLMs can effectively diagnose neuro-oncology cases from free-text histopathology reports according to the latest WHO guidelines. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated the performance of ChatGPT-4o, Claude-3.5-sonnet, and Llama3 across 30 challenging neuropathology cases, which each presented a complex mix of morphological and genetic information relevant to the diagnosis. Furthermore, we integrated these models with the latest WHO guidelines through Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and again assessed their diagnostic accuracy. Our data show that LLMs equipped with RAG, but not without RAG, can accurately diagnose the neuropathological tumour subtype in 90% of the tested cases. This study lays the groundwork for a new generation of computational tools that can assist neuropathologists in their daily reporting practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540532/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/2056-4538.70009\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/2056-4538.70009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界卫生组织(WHO)的中枢神经系统(CNS)肿瘤分类指南每次发布都有很大变化。在大多数其他实体瘤中,中枢神经系统肿瘤的分类是独一无二的复杂,因为它不仅包括形态学特征,还包括遗传学和表观遗传学特征。即使是临床专家,要跟上医学领域的这些变化也是一项挑战。大语言模型(LLM)已经证明了其解析和处理复杂医学文本的能力,但其在神经肿瘤学中的实用性尚未得到系统测试。我们假设大型语言模型可以根据最新的世界卫生组织指南,从自由文本组织病理学报告中有效诊断神经肿瘤病例。为了验证这一假设,我们评估了 ChatGPT-4o、Claude-3.5-sonnet 和 Llama3 在 30 个具有挑战性的神经病理学病例中的表现,每个病例都呈现了与诊断相关的形态学和遗传学信息的复杂组合。此外,我们还通过检索增强生成(RAG)将这些模型与最新的世界卫生组织指南相结合,并再次评估了它们的诊断准确性。我们的数据显示,在 90% 的测试病例中,配备了 RAG 的 LLMs 可以准确诊断出神经病理学肿瘤亚型,而未配备 RAG 的 LLMs 则无法准确诊断出神经病理学肿瘤亚型。这项研究为新一代计算工具奠定了基础,这些工具可以帮助神经病理学家进行日常报告实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Large language models as a diagnostic support tool in neuropathology.

The WHO guidelines for classifying central nervous system (CNS) tumours are changing considerably with each release. The classification of CNS tumours is uniquely complex among most other solid tumours as it incorporates not just morphology, but also genetic and epigenetic features. Keeping current with these changes across medical fields can be challenging, even for clinical specialists. Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated their ability to parse and process complex medical text, but their utility in neuro-oncology has not been systematically tested. We hypothesised that LLMs can effectively diagnose neuro-oncology cases from free-text histopathology reports according to the latest WHO guidelines. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated the performance of ChatGPT-4o, Claude-3.5-sonnet, and Llama3 across 30 challenging neuropathology cases, which each presented a complex mix of morphological and genetic information relevant to the diagnosis. Furthermore, we integrated these models with the latest WHO guidelines through Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and again assessed their diagnostic accuracy. Our data show that LLMs equipped with RAG, but not without RAG, can accurately diagnose the neuropathological tumour subtype in 90% of the tested cases. This study lays the groundwork for a new generation of computational tools that can assist neuropathologists in their daily reporting practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
47
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research and The Journal of Pathology serve as translational bridges between basic biomedical science and clinical medicine with particular emphasis on, but not restricted to, tissue based studies. The focus of The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research is the publication of studies that illuminate the clinical relevance of research in the broad area of the study of disease. Appropriately powered and validated studies with novel diagnostic, prognostic and predictive significance, and biomarker discover and validation, will be welcomed. Studies with a predominantly mechanistic basis will be more appropriate for the companion Journal of Pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信