一例疼痛性视力丧失病例--急诊科眼眶隔室综合征的处理方法。

Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-31 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.21980/J8N35D
Jessica Pelletier, Alexander Croft, Michael Pajor, Matthew Santos, Douglas Char, Marc Mendelsohn, Ernesto Romo
{"title":"一例疼痛性视力丧失病例--急诊科眼眶隔室综合征的处理方法。","authors":"Jessica Pelletier, Alexander Croft, Michael Pajor, Matthew Santos, Douglas Char, Marc Mendelsohn, Ernesto Romo","doi":"10.21980/J8N35D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Audience: </strong>Emergency medicine (EM) residents. This simulation curriculum may also be utilized for senior medical students conducting EM rotations.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Ophthalmologic education represents only a small portion of medical school curriculums and continues to decrease over time, leaving physicians poorly equipped to diagnose and manage eye complaints.1 Of emergency physicians (EPs) surveyed, 72.5% felt that they could diagnose orbital compartment syndrome (OCS), yet only 40.3% felt comfortable performing a necessary lateral canthotomy and cantholysis (LCC).2 These survey results demonstrate the urgent need for improved ophthalmology education in EM residency to help us diagnose and manage potentially vision-threatening pathology.</p><p><strong>Educational objectives: </strong>By the end of this simulation, learners will be able to: 1) demonstrate the major components and a systematic approach to the emergency ophthalmologic examination, 2) develop a differential diagnosis of sight-threatening etiologies that could cause eye pain or vision loss, 3) demonstrate proficiency in performing potentially vision-saving procedures within the scope of EM practice.</p><p><strong>Educational methods: </strong>Low-fidelity simulation was conducted using a novel model adapted from that used by Phillips et al. during their ophthalmology day in the Department of Emergency Medicine at Vanderbilt University.3 The simulation case was developed by an interdepartmental team of ophthalmologists and EPs at our institution.</p><p><strong>Research objectives: </strong>To evaluate for statistically significant changes in self-efficacy, knowledge, and performance after an educational intervention. Our primary outcome was defined as a checklist-based performance on a simulated case of orbital compartment syndrome necessitating LCC.</p><p><strong>Research methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center prospective pre- and post-interventional study evaluating the impact of an educational intervention on EM resident management of a simulated case of OCS. Our two-part study intervention consisted of a lecture on OCS followed by a four and a half hour ophthalmology education day (OED). Residents were evaluated using self-efficacy scales (SES), multiple-choice questions (MCQ), and a performance checklist (developed via a modified Delphi process) at three timepoints: Pre-intervention, immediate post-intervention, and three months post-intervention. Post-graduate year (PGY)-1 through PGY-4 EM residents at an Urban Level 1 Trauma Center participated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initial recruitment consisted of 18 residents (PGY-1 through PGY-4), and 16 residents (PGY-1 through PGY-3) completed the study. Nine residents participated in the OED and seven residents did not. There were no pre-existing differences in median checklist-based performance, MCQ, or SES scores prior to the intervention. At three months post-OED, the OED attendees scored statistically significantly higher on checklist-based performance than non-attendees (lecture only).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Ophthalmology education in physician training is limited, and EP comfort with performing vision-saving procedures is poor. We developed a simulation case involving such a vision-saving procedure as well as an ophthalmology curriculum that increased skill retention surrounding management of ophthalmologic emergencies.</p><p><strong>Topics: </strong>Emergency medicine (EM), ophthalmology, orbital compartment syndrome (OCS), retrobulbar hematoma, vision loss, eye pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":73721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537727/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Case of Painful Visual Loss - Managing Orbital Compartment Syndrome in the Emergency Department.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Pelletier, Alexander Croft, Michael Pajor, Matthew Santos, Douglas Char, Marc Mendelsohn, Ernesto Romo\",\"doi\":\"10.21980/J8N35D\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Audience: </strong>Emergency medicine (EM) residents. This simulation curriculum may also be utilized for senior medical students conducting EM rotations.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Ophthalmologic education represents only a small portion of medical school curriculums and continues to decrease over time, leaving physicians poorly equipped to diagnose and manage eye complaints.1 Of emergency physicians (EPs) surveyed, 72.5% felt that they could diagnose orbital compartment syndrome (OCS), yet only 40.3% felt comfortable performing a necessary lateral canthotomy and cantholysis (LCC).2 These survey results demonstrate the urgent need for improved ophthalmology education in EM residency to help us diagnose and manage potentially vision-threatening pathology.</p><p><strong>Educational objectives: </strong>By the end of this simulation, learners will be able to: 1) demonstrate the major components and a systematic approach to the emergency ophthalmologic examination, 2) develop a differential diagnosis of sight-threatening etiologies that could cause eye pain or vision loss, 3) demonstrate proficiency in performing potentially vision-saving procedures within the scope of EM practice.</p><p><strong>Educational methods: </strong>Low-fidelity simulation was conducted using a novel model adapted from that used by Phillips et al. during their ophthalmology day in the Department of Emergency Medicine at Vanderbilt University.3 The simulation case was developed by an interdepartmental team of ophthalmologists and EPs at our institution.</p><p><strong>Research objectives: </strong>To evaluate for statistically significant changes in self-efficacy, knowledge, and performance after an educational intervention. Our primary outcome was defined as a checklist-based performance on a simulated case of orbital compartment syndrome necessitating LCC.</p><p><strong>Research methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center prospective pre- and post-interventional study evaluating the impact of an educational intervention on EM resident management of a simulated case of OCS. Our two-part study intervention consisted of a lecture on OCS followed by a four and a half hour ophthalmology education day (OED). Residents were evaluated using self-efficacy scales (SES), multiple-choice questions (MCQ), and a performance checklist (developed via a modified Delphi process) at three timepoints: Pre-intervention, immediate post-intervention, and three months post-intervention. Post-graduate year (PGY)-1 through PGY-4 EM residents at an Urban Level 1 Trauma Center participated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initial recruitment consisted of 18 residents (PGY-1 through PGY-4), and 16 residents (PGY-1 through PGY-3) completed the study. Nine residents participated in the OED and seven residents did not. There were no pre-existing differences in median checklist-based performance, MCQ, or SES scores prior to the intervention. At three months post-OED, the OED attendees scored statistically significantly higher on checklist-based performance than non-attendees (lecture only).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Ophthalmology education in physician training is limited, and EP comfort with performing vision-saving procedures is poor. We developed a simulation case involving such a vision-saving procedure as well as an ophthalmology curriculum that increased skill retention surrounding management of ophthalmologic emergencies.</p><p><strong>Topics: </strong>Emergency medicine (EM), ophthalmology, orbital compartment syndrome (OCS), retrobulbar hematoma, vision loss, eye pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537727/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21980/J8N35D\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21980/J8N35D","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

受众:急诊医学(EM)住院医师。背景:眼科教育只占医学院课程的一小部分,而且随着时间的推移还在不断减少:背景:眼科教育只占医学院课程的一小部分,而且随着时间的推移还在不断减少,导致医生在诊断和处理眼部不适方面的能力不足1。在接受调查的急诊医生(EPs)中,72.5%的人认为他们可以诊断眶隔综合征(OCS),但只有 40.3%的人认为可以自如地进行必要的外侧支气管切开术和支气管溶解术(LCC):本模拟课程结束时,学员将能够1) 展示眼科急诊检查的主要内容和系统方法;2) 对可能导致眼痛或视力丧失的危及视力的病因进行鉴别诊断;3) 展示在急诊医学实践范围内熟练执行可能挽救视力的程序:教育方法:采用一种新颖的模型进行低保真模拟,该模型改编自菲利普斯等人在范德比尔特大学急诊医学系眼科日所使用的模型:研究目的:评估教育干预后在自我效能、知识和表现方面发生的统计学意义上的显著变化。我们的主要结果被定义为在需要 LCC 的眶隔综合征模拟病例中基于检查表的表现:我们进行了一项单中心前瞻性前后干预研究,评估教育干预对电磁住院医师处理模拟眶隔综合征病例的影响。我们的研究干预由两部分组成,首先是关于 OCS 的讲座,然后是四个半小时的眼科教育日(OED)。住院医师在三个时间点使用自我效能量表(SES)、多项选择题(MCQ)和绩效检查表(通过改良的德尔菲程序开发)进行评估:三个时间点:干预前、干预后和干预后三个月。一家城市一级创伤中心的研究生年级(PGY)-1 至 PGY-4 的急诊科住院医师参加了此次活动:初步招募了 18 名住院医师(PGY-1 至 PGY-4),16 名住院医师(PGY-1 至 PGY-3)完成了研究。9 名住院医师参加了 OED,7 名住院医师没有参加。干预前,基于检查表的成绩中位数、MCQ 或 SES 分数不存在差异。在OED结束后的三个月,参加OED的住院医师在基于检查表的成绩方面的得分明显高于未参加者(仅参加讲座):讨论:医生培训中的眼科教育非常有限,而眼科专家在进行视力挽救手术时的舒适度很差。我们开发了一个涉及视力挽救程序的模拟病例以及眼科课程,以提高眼科急诊管理技能的保持率:急诊医学(EM)、眼科、眶隔综合征(OCS)、球后血肿、视力丧失、眼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Case of Painful Visual Loss - Managing Orbital Compartment Syndrome in the Emergency Department.

Audience: Emergency medicine (EM) residents. This simulation curriculum may also be utilized for senior medical students conducting EM rotations.

Background: Ophthalmologic education represents only a small portion of medical school curriculums and continues to decrease over time, leaving physicians poorly equipped to diagnose and manage eye complaints.1 Of emergency physicians (EPs) surveyed, 72.5% felt that they could diagnose orbital compartment syndrome (OCS), yet only 40.3% felt comfortable performing a necessary lateral canthotomy and cantholysis (LCC).2 These survey results demonstrate the urgent need for improved ophthalmology education in EM residency to help us diagnose and manage potentially vision-threatening pathology.

Educational objectives: By the end of this simulation, learners will be able to: 1) demonstrate the major components and a systematic approach to the emergency ophthalmologic examination, 2) develop a differential diagnosis of sight-threatening etiologies that could cause eye pain or vision loss, 3) demonstrate proficiency in performing potentially vision-saving procedures within the scope of EM practice.

Educational methods: Low-fidelity simulation was conducted using a novel model adapted from that used by Phillips et al. during their ophthalmology day in the Department of Emergency Medicine at Vanderbilt University.3 The simulation case was developed by an interdepartmental team of ophthalmologists and EPs at our institution.

Research objectives: To evaluate for statistically significant changes in self-efficacy, knowledge, and performance after an educational intervention. Our primary outcome was defined as a checklist-based performance on a simulated case of orbital compartment syndrome necessitating LCC.

Research methods: We conducted a single-center prospective pre- and post-interventional study evaluating the impact of an educational intervention on EM resident management of a simulated case of OCS. Our two-part study intervention consisted of a lecture on OCS followed by a four and a half hour ophthalmology education day (OED). Residents were evaluated using self-efficacy scales (SES), multiple-choice questions (MCQ), and a performance checklist (developed via a modified Delphi process) at three timepoints: Pre-intervention, immediate post-intervention, and three months post-intervention. Post-graduate year (PGY)-1 through PGY-4 EM residents at an Urban Level 1 Trauma Center participated.

Results: Initial recruitment consisted of 18 residents (PGY-1 through PGY-4), and 16 residents (PGY-1 through PGY-3) completed the study. Nine residents participated in the OED and seven residents did not. There were no pre-existing differences in median checklist-based performance, MCQ, or SES scores prior to the intervention. At three months post-OED, the OED attendees scored statistically significantly higher on checklist-based performance than non-attendees (lecture only).

Discussion: Ophthalmology education in physician training is limited, and EP comfort with performing vision-saving procedures is poor. We developed a simulation case involving such a vision-saving procedure as well as an ophthalmology curriculum that increased skill retention surrounding management of ophthalmologic emergencies.

Topics: Emergency medicine (EM), ophthalmology, orbital compartment syndrome (OCS), retrobulbar hematoma, vision loss, eye pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信