{"title":"丧亲家庭调查的苦恼和益处:死亡率跟踪调查。","authors":"Mai Hosokawa, Yoko Nakazawa, Mitsunori Miyashita, Kento Masukawa, Momoka Sato, Tatsuya Morita, Yasuyiki Okumura, Yoshiyuki Kizawa, Shohei Kawagoe, Hiroshi Yamamoto, Emi Takeuchi, Risa Yamazaki, Asao Ogawa","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.10.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The Bereaved Family Survey is an important method for evaluating the quality of palliative care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the distress and benefits of bereaved families of patients with or without cancer, who participated in a Bereaved Family Survey, and identify factors associated with distress and benefits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional, self-reported questionnaire mail survey among the bereaved families of patients who died of cancer, heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, pneumonia, or kidney failure. Participants answered questions on a four-point Likert scale measuring the distress and benefit associated with participating in the Bereaved Family Survey. We conducted a qualitative analysis of responses to open-ended questions about the distress and benefits of participating in the survey to comprehensively examine the distress and benefits of participating in the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questionnaires were distributed to 115,816 eligible bereaved family members between February 2019 and February 2020; 62,576 (54.0%) family members returned valid responses. Distress and benefits accounted for 51.4% and 49.3%, respectively. The results of the binomial logistic analysis for distress were significantly higher among cancer patients (P < 0.001-0.003), 20-39-year-old patients (P < 0.001), female bereaved family members (P < 0.001), and bereaved family members with poor mental health statuses (P < 0.001). Factors related to \"benefit\" were significantly higher among over-80-year-old bereaved family members (P < 0.001), higher care evaluation scale (CES) scores (P < 0.001), and higher good death inventory (GDI) scores (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bereaved family members experience both distress and benefits. There is need to devise ways to reduce distress and increase its benefits to continue assessing the quality of palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":"152-164"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Distress and Benefits of the Bereaved Family Survey: A Mortality Follow-Back Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Mai Hosokawa, Yoko Nakazawa, Mitsunori Miyashita, Kento Masukawa, Momoka Sato, Tatsuya Morita, Yasuyiki Okumura, Yoshiyuki Kizawa, Shohei Kawagoe, Hiroshi Yamamoto, Emi Takeuchi, Risa Yamazaki, Asao Ogawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.10.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The Bereaved Family Survey is an important method for evaluating the quality of palliative care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the distress and benefits of bereaved families of patients with or without cancer, who participated in a Bereaved Family Survey, and identify factors associated with distress and benefits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional, self-reported questionnaire mail survey among the bereaved families of patients who died of cancer, heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, pneumonia, or kidney failure. Participants answered questions on a four-point Likert scale measuring the distress and benefit associated with participating in the Bereaved Family Survey. We conducted a qualitative analysis of responses to open-ended questions about the distress and benefits of participating in the survey to comprehensively examine the distress and benefits of participating in the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questionnaires were distributed to 115,816 eligible bereaved family members between February 2019 and February 2020; 62,576 (54.0%) family members returned valid responses. Distress and benefits accounted for 51.4% and 49.3%, respectively. The results of the binomial logistic analysis for distress were significantly higher among cancer patients (P < 0.001-0.003), 20-39-year-old patients (P < 0.001), female bereaved family members (P < 0.001), and bereaved family members with poor mental health statuses (P < 0.001). Factors related to \\\"benefit\\\" were significantly higher among over-80-year-old bereaved family members (P < 0.001), higher care evaluation scale (CES) scores (P < 0.001), and higher good death inventory (GDI) scores (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bereaved family members experience both distress and benefits. There is need to devise ways to reduce distress and increase its benefits to continue assessing the quality of palliative care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"152-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.10.029\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.10.029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Distress and Benefits of the Bereaved Family Survey: A Mortality Follow-Back Survey.
Context: The Bereaved Family Survey is an important method for evaluating the quality of palliative care.
Objectives: To examine the distress and benefits of bereaved families of patients with or without cancer, who participated in a Bereaved Family Survey, and identify factors associated with distress and benefits.
Methods: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional, self-reported questionnaire mail survey among the bereaved families of patients who died of cancer, heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, pneumonia, or kidney failure. Participants answered questions on a four-point Likert scale measuring the distress and benefit associated with participating in the Bereaved Family Survey. We conducted a qualitative analysis of responses to open-ended questions about the distress and benefits of participating in the survey to comprehensively examine the distress and benefits of participating in the survey.
Results: Questionnaires were distributed to 115,816 eligible bereaved family members between February 2019 and February 2020; 62,576 (54.0%) family members returned valid responses. Distress and benefits accounted for 51.4% and 49.3%, respectively. The results of the binomial logistic analysis for distress were significantly higher among cancer patients (P < 0.001-0.003), 20-39-year-old patients (P < 0.001), female bereaved family members (P < 0.001), and bereaved family members with poor mental health statuses (P < 0.001). Factors related to "benefit" were significantly higher among over-80-year-old bereaved family members (P < 0.001), higher care evaluation scale (CES) scores (P < 0.001), and higher good death inventory (GDI) scores (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Bereaved family members experience both distress and benefits. There is need to devise ways to reduce distress and increase its benefits to continue assessing the quality of palliative care.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.