Jamie Deans, Brian Burns, William Portas, Clare Hannah, Jack Buchanan, Yasmine Motashar
{"title":"阿斯利康 COVID-19 疫苗对急诊科的影响。","authors":"Jamie Deans, Brian Burns, William Portas, Clare Hannah, Jack Buchanan, Yasmine Motashar","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.14519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of the AstraZeneca (AZ) vaccine roll-out on an ED. Primary outcomes are ED length of stay (LOS), investigation ordering and costs. Secondary measures are compliance with the Thrombosis and Haemostasis Society of Australia and New Zealand (THANZ) Vaccine-Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopaenia Syndrome (VITT) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study examined a level 5 ED in Sydney, Australia. Triages mentioning the AZ vaccine between 7 July 2021 and 8 November 2021 were reviewed. Cases were limited to a single day of the week. Researchers reviewed clinical notes to identify patients that presented due to AZ vaccine concern and abstracted relevant data. Costings were calculated using an ED activity-based funding algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand three hundred and fifty cases were identified, with 167 analysed (12%) and 97 presented (7%). Median LOS was 195 min (IQR: 152-232 min, 95% CI [184, 217]). Median age was 43 years (IQR: 35-65 years, 95% CI [44, 51]). Median Australian Triage Category was 4. Ninety-eight percent were discharged directly home. Ninety-four percent underwent pathology and 41% radiology. Compliance with the THANZ guidelines was 16%. No findings were related to VITT. AZ vaccine concern contributed 12% of August ED caseload. Over the 16-week study period a cost of AUD$486 747.99 was extrapolated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A high number of young, low acuity patients presented to the ED with AZ vaccine concerns and were associated with financial and workload implications. The quantity of ED presentations appears to be associated with vaccine administration rates. There was poor compliance with the THANZ guidelines, and they appear to have contributed to the high volume of investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the Astra Zeneca COVID-19 vaccine on an emergency department.\",\"authors\":\"Jamie Deans, Brian Burns, William Portas, Clare Hannah, Jack Buchanan, Yasmine Motashar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1742-6723.14519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of the AstraZeneca (AZ) vaccine roll-out on an ED. Primary outcomes are ED length of stay (LOS), investigation ordering and costs. Secondary measures are compliance with the Thrombosis and Haemostasis Society of Australia and New Zealand (THANZ) Vaccine-Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopaenia Syndrome (VITT) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study examined a level 5 ED in Sydney, Australia. Triages mentioning the AZ vaccine between 7 July 2021 and 8 November 2021 were reviewed. Cases were limited to a single day of the week. Researchers reviewed clinical notes to identify patients that presented due to AZ vaccine concern and abstracted relevant data. Costings were calculated using an ED activity-based funding algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand three hundred and fifty cases were identified, with 167 analysed (12%) and 97 presented (7%). Median LOS was 195 min (IQR: 152-232 min, 95% CI [184, 217]). Median age was 43 years (IQR: 35-65 years, 95% CI [44, 51]). Median Australian Triage Category was 4. Ninety-eight percent were discharged directly home. Ninety-four percent underwent pathology and 41% radiology. Compliance with the THANZ guidelines was 16%. No findings were related to VITT. AZ vaccine concern contributed 12% of August ED caseload. Over the 16-week study period a cost of AUD$486 747.99 was extrapolated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A high number of young, low acuity patients presented to the ED with AZ vaccine concerns and were associated with financial and workload implications. The quantity of ED presentations appears to be associated with vaccine administration rates. There was poor compliance with the THANZ guidelines, and they appear to have contributed to the high volume of investigations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medicine Australasia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medicine Australasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.14519\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.14519","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估阿斯利康(AZ)疫苗推广对急诊室的影响。主要结果是急诊室的住院时间(LOS)、调查订单和成本。次要指标是对澳大利亚和新西兰血栓与止血学会(THANZ)疫苗诱发血栓性血小板减少综合征(VITT)指南的遵守情况:这项回顾性观察研究检查了澳大利亚悉尼的一家 5 级急诊室。研究回顾了 2021 年 7 月 7 日至 2021 年 11 月 8 日期间提及 AZ 疫苗的分诊情况。病例仅限于一周中的某一天。研究人员查阅了临床记录,以确定因担心接种 AZ 疫苗而就诊的患者,并摘录了相关数据。成本计算采用基于急诊室活动的资金算法:共确定了 1350 个病例,分析了 167 个病例(12%),97 个病例(7%)。住院时间中位数为 195 分钟(IQR:152-232 分钟,95% CI [184, 217])。中位年龄为 43 岁(IQR:35-65 岁,95% CI [44,51])。澳大利亚分诊类别中位数为 4。94%的患者接受了病理检查,41%接受了放射检查。符合THANZ指南的比例为16%。没有发现与 VITT 有关的情况。亚利桑那州的疫苗问题占八月份急诊室工作量的 12%。在为期16周的研究期间,推算出的费用为486 747.99澳元:结论:大量年轻、病情较轻的患者因接种 AZ 疫苗而前往急诊室就诊,这对经济和工作量都有影响。急诊室接诊量似乎与疫苗接种率有关。对 THANZ 指南的遵守情况很差,这似乎也是造成大量调查的原因之一。
Impact of the Astra Zeneca COVID-19 vaccine on an emergency department.
Objective: To assess the impact of the AstraZeneca (AZ) vaccine roll-out on an ED. Primary outcomes are ED length of stay (LOS), investigation ordering and costs. Secondary measures are compliance with the Thrombosis and Haemostasis Society of Australia and New Zealand (THANZ) Vaccine-Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopaenia Syndrome (VITT) guidelines.
Methods: This retrospective observational study examined a level 5 ED in Sydney, Australia. Triages mentioning the AZ vaccine between 7 July 2021 and 8 November 2021 were reviewed. Cases were limited to a single day of the week. Researchers reviewed clinical notes to identify patients that presented due to AZ vaccine concern and abstracted relevant data. Costings were calculated using an ED activity-based funding algorithm.
Results: One thousand three hundred and fifty cases were identified, with 167 analysed (12%) and 97 presented (7%). Median LOS was 195 min (IQR: 152-232 min, 95% CI [184, 217]). Median age was 43 years (IQR: 35-65 years, 95% CI [44, 51]). Median Australian Triage Category was 4. Ninety-eight percent were discharged directly home. Ninety-four percent underwent pathology and 41% radiology. Compliance with the THANZ guidelines was 16%. No findings were related to VITT. AZ vaccine concern contributed 12% of August ED caseload. Over the 16-week study period a cost of AUD$486 747.99 was extrapolated.
Conclusions: A high number of young, low acuity patients presented to the ED with AZ vaccine concerns and were associated with financial and workload implications. The quantity of ED presentations appears to be associated with vaccine administration rates. There was poor compliance with the THANZ guidelines, and they appear to have contributed to the high volume of investigations.
期刊介绍:
Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine.
Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.