认知网络和运动网络在步态过程中支持双任务优先的不同神经机制

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Eunkyung Kim, Seo Jung Yun, Byung-Mo Oh, Han Gil Seo
{"title":"认知网络和运动网络在步态过程中支持双任务优先的不同神经机制","authors":"Eunkyung Kim, Seo Jung Yun, Byung-Mo Oh, Han Gil Seo","doi":"10.1089/brain.2024.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Prioritization strategy during gait significantly influences gait performance and successful gait relies on interactions between cognitive and motor functions. This study aimed to examine the within- and between-network connectivities of cognitive and motor networks associated with dual-task priority during gait. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Twenty-nine healthy individuals (66.86 ± 8.53 years) underwent the timed-up-and-go (TUG) test alone, TUG with a cognitive task, and the cognitive task alone. The cognitive task involved sequentially subtracting three from a random number between 50 and 100. The resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging was acquired on the same day. Using independent component analysis, the dorsal attention network (DAN), frontoparietal network (FPN), primary motor network (PM), and lateral motor network were assessed. The participants were divided into cognitive and motor priority groups based on the modified attention allocation index (mAAI). Group comparisons of within- and between-network connectivity were conducted using permutation tests. Additionally, correlation analysis was employed to investigate the association between-network connectivity and task priority. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The cognitive priority group showed cognitive dual-task facilitation. In comparison to the motor priority group, they also showed comparable motor dual-task costs and lower combined dual-task costs. They exhibited increased within-network connectivity in the left FPN and enhanced between-network connectivity between the right FPN and both the DAN and PM. These between-network connectivities were negatively correlated with mAAI scores. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The results suggest distinct neural mechanisms across cognitive and motor networks based on individuals' dual-task strategies. This may have implications for understanding gait performance in complex contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":9155,"journal":{"name":"Brain connectivity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinct Neural Mechanisms Underlying Dual-Task Priority During Gait Across Cognitive and Motor Networks.\",\"authors\":\"Eunkyung Kim, Seo Jung Yun, Byung-Mo Oh, Han Gil Seo\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/brain.2024.0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Prioritization strategy during gait significantly influences gait performance and successful gait relies on interactions between cognitive and motor functions. This study aimed to examine the within- and between-network connectivities of cognitive and motor networks associated with dual-task priority during gait. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Twenty-nine healthy individuals (66.86 ± 8.53 years) underwent the timed-up-and-go (TUG) test alone, TUG with a cognitive task, and the cognitive task alone. The cognitive task involved sequentially subtracting three from a random number between 50 and 100. The resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging was acquired on the same day. Using independent component analysis, the dorsal attention network (DAN), frontoparietal network (FPN), primary motor network (PM), and lateral motor network were assessed. The participants were divided into cognitive and motor priority groups based on the modified attention allocation index (mAAI). Group comparisons of within- and between-network connectivity were conducted using permutation tests. Additionally, correlation analysis was employed to investigate the association between-network connectivity and task priority. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The cognitive priority group showed cognitive dual-task facilitation. In comparison to the motor priority group, they also showed comparable motor dual-task costs and lower combined dual-task costs. They exhibited increased within-network connectivity in the left FPN and enhanced between-network connectivity between the right FPN and both the DAN and PM. These between-network connectivities were negatively correlated with mAAI scores. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The results suggest distinct neural mechanisms across cognitive and motor networks based on individuals' dual-task strategies. This may have implications for understanding gait performance in complex contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain connectivity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain connectivity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2024.0014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain connectivity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2024.0014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:步态过程中的优先策略会极大地影响步态表现,而成功的步态依赖于认知功能和运动功能之间的相互作用。本研究旨在检测步态过程中与双任务优先相关的认知和运动网络的内部和网络间连接性。研究方法29 名健康人(66.86 ± 8.53 岁)分别接受了单独的定时起立行走(TUG)测试、TUG 与认知任务测试以及单独的认知任务测试。认知任务包括从 50 到 100 之间的随机数中依次减去 3。静息态功能磁共振成像在同一天完成。通过独立成分分析,评估了背侧注意网络(DAN)、额顶网络(FPN)、初级运动网络(PM)和侧向运动网络。根据修正的注意力分配指数(mAAI)将参与者分为认知优先组和运动优先组。使用置换检验对网络内和网络间的连接性进行分组比较。此外,还采用了相关分析来研究网络连通性与任务优先级之间的关联。结果显示认知优先组表现出认知双任务促进。与运动优先组相比,他们的运动双任务成本相当,综合双任务成本较低。他们表现出左侧 FPN 的网内连通性增强,右侧 FPN 与 DAN 和 PM 之间的网间连通性增强。这些网络间连通性与 mAAI 评分呈负相关。结论研究结果表明,基于个体的双任务策略,认知和运动网络之间存在不同的神经机制。这可能会对理解复杂情境下的步态表现产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distinct Neural Mechanisms Underlying Dual-Task Priority During Gait Across Cognitive and Motor Networks.

Background: Prioritization strategy during gait significantly influences gait performance and successful gait relies on interactions between cognitive and motor functions. This study aimed to examine the within- and between-network connectivities of cognitive and motor networks associated with dual-task priority during gait. Methods: Twenty-nine healthy individuals (66.86 ± 8.53 years) underwent the timed-up-and-go (TUG) test alone, TUG with a cognitive task, and the cognitive task alone. The cognitive task involved sequentially subtracting three from a random number between 50 and 100. The resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging was acquired on the same day. Using independent component analysis, the dorsal attention network (DAN), frontoparietal network (FPN), primary motor network (PM), and lateral motor network were assessed. The participants were divided into cognitive and motor priority groups based on the modified attention allocation index (mAAI). Group comparisons of within- and between-network connectivity were conducted using permutation tests. Additionally, correlation analysis was employed to investigate the association between-network connectivity and task priority. Results: The cognitive priority group showed cognitive dual-task facilitation. In comparison to the motor priority group, they also showed comparable motor dual-task costs and lower combined dual-task costs. They exhibited increased within-network connectivity in the left FPN and enhanced between-network connectivity between the right FPN and both the DAN and PM. These between-network connectivities were negatively correlated with mAAI scores. Conclusion: The results suggest distinct neural mechanisms across cognitive and motor networks based on individuals' dual-task strategies. This may have implications for understanding gait performance in complex contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain connectivity
Brain connectivity Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Brain Connectivity provides groundbreaking findings in the rapidly advancing field of connectivity research at the systems and network levels. The Journal disseminates information on brain mapping, modeling, novel research techniques, new imaging modalities, preclinical animal studies, and the translation of research discoveries from the laboratory to the clinic. This essential journal fosters the application of basic biological discoveries and contributes to the development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic interventions to recognize and treat a broad range of neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders such as: Alzheimer’s disease, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, stroke, dementia, and depression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信