老年人桡骨远端骨折非手术治疗中两种固定方法的放射学比较:单糖块夹板与长臂石膏的疗效相似。

Ali Engin Daştan, Arman Vahabi, Kadir Yağmuroğlu, Yusuf Kerem Limon, Aytek Hüseyin Çeliksöz, Okan Tezgel, Levent Kucuk, Erhan Coskunol, Kemal Aktuglu
{"title":"老年人桡骨远端骨折非手术治疗中两种固定方法的放射学比较:单糖块夹板与长臂石膏的疗效相似。","authors":"Ali Engin Daştan, Arman Vahabi, Kadir Yağmuroğlu, Yusuf Kerem Limon, Aytek Hüseyin Çeliksöz, Okan Tezgel, Levent Kucuk, Erhan Coskunol, Kemal Aktuglu","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2024.87426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to compare the effectiveness of the long-arm cast (LAC) and the single sugar-tong splint (SSTS) in the non-operative treatment of distal radius fractures in the geriatric population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients consulted at the Orthopedics and Traumatology Department within the Emergency Department (ED) were reviewed through the electronic archives of a tertiary university hospital over a five-year period. The study included patients aged 65 years and older with a distal radius fracture who required reduction, had successful closed reduction, and had at least six weeks of X-ray follow-up. The patients were divided into two groups based on the immobilization method: the SSTS group (n=88) and the LAC group (n=31). The patients' radiographs taken after reduction in the ED, as well as at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 6th weeks, were evaluated. Radial height, radial inclination, volar tilt, and ulnar variance were measured on the radiographs at each visit. The delta value was calculated by subtracting the measurement on the first post-reduction radiograph from the measurement taken at the sixth week. The data obtained were then compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 119 patients (93 females, 26 males, mean age: 72.9±7.3 years; range, 65 to 90 years) were included. The mean age was 74.6±7.6 in Group 1 and 72.3±7.2 in Group 2 (p=0.135). Group 1 consisted of 26 females and 5 males; Group 2 included 67 females and 21 males (p=0.52). Statistically significant differences were observed in post-reduction volar tilt (p=0.005), first week volar tilt (p=0.020), post-reduction ulnar variance (p=0.044), first week ulnar variance (p=0.037), and second week ulnar variance (p=0.027) between the groups. No statistically significant differences were detected in other radiological parameters, including delta values. Two patients in Group 1 and seven patients in Group 2 required secondary intervention (p=1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the non-operative management of geriatric distal radius fractures, the SSTS is an immobilization technique that is as effective as the LAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":94263,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiological comparison of two immobilization methods in the non-surgical treatment of distal radius fractures in the elderly: Single sugar-tong splint shows similar efficacy to long-arm cast.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Engin Daştan, Arman Vahabi, Kadir Yağmuroğlu, Yusuf Kerem Limon, Aytek Hüseyin Çeliksöz, Okan Tezgel, Levent Kucuk, Erhan Coskunol, Kemal Aktuglu\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/tjtes.2024.87426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to compare the effectiveness of the long-arm cast (LAC) and the single sugar-tong splint (SSTS) in the non-operative treatment of distal radius fractures in the geriatric population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients consulted at the Orthopedics and Traumatology Department within the Emergency Department (ED) were reviewed through the electronic archives of a tertiary university hospital over a five-year period. The study included patients aged 65 years and older with a distal radius fracture who required reduction, had successful closed reduction, and had at least six weeks of X-ray follow-up. The patients were divided into two groups based on the immobilization method: the SSTS group (n=88) and the LAC group (n=31). The patients' radiographs taken after reduction in the ED, as well as at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 6th weeks, were evaluated. Radial height, radial inclination, volar tilt, and ulnar variance were measured on the radiographs at each visit. The delta value was calculated by subtracting the measurement on the first post-reduction radiograph from the measurement taken at the sixth week. The data obtained were then compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 119 patients (93 females, 26 males, mean age: 72.9±7.3 years; range, 65 to 90 years) were included. The mean age was 74.6±7.6 in Group 1 and 72.3±7.2 in Group 2 (p=0.135). Group 1 consisted of 26 females and 5 males; Group 2 included 67 females and 21 males (p=0.52). Statistically significant differences were observed in post-reduction volar tilt (p=0.005), first week volar tilt (p=0.020), post-reduction ulnar variance (p=0.044), first week ulnar variance (p=0.037), and second week ulnar variance (p=0.027) between the groups. No statistically significant differences were detected in other radiological parameters, including delta values. Two patients in Group 1 and seven patients in Group 2 required secondary intervention (p=1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the non-operative management of geriatric distal radius fractures, the SSTS is an immobilization technique that is as effective as the LAC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2024.87426\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2024.87426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在比较长臂石膏(LAC)和单糖童夹板(SSTS)在非手术治疗老年桡骨远端骨折中的有效性:我们通过一家三级大学医院的电子档案对急诊科(ED)内骨科和创伤科的就诊患者进行了为期五年的回顾性研究。研究对象包括 65 岁及以上、桡骨远端骨折、需要复位、成功闭合复位并接受至少六周 X 光随访的患者。根据固定方法将患者分为两组:SSTS 组(88 人)和 LAC 组(31 人)。对患者在急诊室减张后以及第 1 周、第 2 周、第 4 周和第 6 周的 X 光片进行评估。在每次就诊时的照片上测量桡骨高度、桡骨倾斜度、外侧倾斜度和尺骨差异。将缩小后第一张照片上的测量值减去第六周的测量值,计算出 delta 值。然后对两组数据进行比较:共纳入 119 名患者(93 名女性,26 名男性,平均年龄为(72.9±7.3)岁;年龄范围为 65 至 90 岁)。第一组的平均年龄为(74.6±7.6)岁,第二组为(72.3±7.2)岁(P=0.135)。第 1 组有 26 名女性和 5 名男性;第 2 组有 67 名女性和 21 名男性(P=0.52)。两组之间在缩复后的伏仰(p=0.005)、第一周的伏仰(p=0.020)、缩复后的尺侧方差(p=0.044)、第一周的尺侧方差(p=0.037)和第二周的尺侧方差(p=0.027)方面均存在统计学差异。其他放射学参数(包括 delta 值)未发现有统计学意义的差异。第一组有两名患者需要二次干预,第二组有七名患者需要二次干预(P=1):结论:在老年桡骨远端骨折的非手术治疗中,SSTS 是一种与 LAC 同样有效的固定技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radiological comparison of two immobilization methods in the non-surgical treatment of distal radius fractures in the elderly: Single sugar-tong splint shows similar efficacy to long-arm cast.

Background: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of the long-arm cast (LAC) and the single sugar-tong splint (SSTS) in the non-operative treatment of distal radius fractures in the geriatric population.

Methods: Patients consulted at the Orthopedics and Traumatology Department within the Emergency Department (ED) were reviewed through the electronic archives of a tertiary university hospital over a five-year period. The study included patients aged 65 years and older with a distal radius fracture who required reduction, had successful closed reduction, and had at least six weeks of X-ray follow-up. The patients were divided into two groups based on the immobilization method: the SSTS group (n=88) and the LAC group (n=31). The patients' radiographs taken after reduction in the ED, as well as at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 6th weeks, were evaluated. Radial height, radial inclination, volar tilt, and ulnar variance were measured on the radiographs at each visit. The delta value was calculated by subtracting the measurement on the first post-reduction radiograph from the measurement taken at the sixth week. The data obtained were then compared between the two groups.

Results: A total of 119 patients (93 females, 26 males, mean age: 72.9±7.3 years; range, 65 to 90 years) were included. The mean age was 74.6±7.6 in Group 1 and 72.3±7.2 in Group 2 (p=0.135). Group 1 consisted of 26 females and 5 males; Group 2 included 67 females and 21 males (p=0.52). Statistically significant differences were observed in post-reduction volar tilt (p=0.005), first week volar tilt (p=0.020), post-reduction ulnar variance (p=0.044), first week ulnar variance (p=0.037), and second week ulnar variance (p=0.027) between the groups. No statistically significant differences were detected in other radiological parameters, including delta values. Two patients in Group 1 and seven patients in Group 2 required secondary intervention (p=1).

Conclusion: In the non-operative management of geriatric distal radius fractures, the SSTS is an immobilization technique that is as effective as the LAC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信