John W Lyng, Caitlin Ward, Matthew Angelidis, Amelia Breyre, Ross Donaldson, Kenji Inaba, Maria J Mandt, Nichole Bosson
{"title":"院前创伤简编:创伤性气胸护理 - NAEMSP 的立场声明和资料文件。","authors":"John W Lyng, Caitlin Ward, Matthew Angelidis, Amelia Breyre, Ross Donaldson, Kenji Inaba, Maria J Mandt, Nichole Bosson","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2416978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians manage patients with traumatic pneumothoraxes. These may be simple pneumothoraxes that are less clinically impactful, or tension pneumothoraxes that disturb perfusion, lead to shock, and impart significant risk for morbidity and mortality. Needle thoracostomy is the most common EMS treatment of tension pneumothorax, but despite the potentially life-saving value of needle thoracostomy, reports indicate frequent misapplication of the procedure as well as low rates of successful decompression. This has led some to question the value of prehospital needle thoracostomy and has prompted consideration of alternative approaches to management (e.g., simple thoracostomy, tube thoracostomy). EMS clinicians must determine when pleural decompression is indicated and optimize the safety and effectiveness of the procedure. Furthermore, there is also ambiguity regarding EMS management of open pneumothoraxes. To provide evidence-based guidance on the management of traumatic pneumothoraxes in the EMS setting, the National Association of EMS Physicians (NAEMSP) performed a structured literature review and developed the following recommendations supported by the evidence summarized in the accompanying resource document.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prehospital Trauma Compendium: Traumatic Pneumothorax Care: Position Statement and Resource Document of NAEMSP.\",\"authors\":\"John W Lyng, Caitlin Ward, Matthew Angelidis, Amelia Breyre, Ross Donaldson, Kenji Inaba, Maria J Mandt, Nichole Bosson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2024.2416978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians manage patients with traumatic pneumothoraxes. These may be simple pneumothoraxes that are less clinically impactful, or tension pneumothoraxes that disturb perfusion, lead to shock, and impart significant risk for morbidity and mortality. Needle thoracostomy is the most common EMS treatment of tension pneumothorax, but despite the potentially life-saving value of needle thoracostomy, reports indicate frequent misapplication of the procedure as well as low rates of successful decompression. This has led some to question the value of prehospital needle thoracostomy and has prompted consideration of alternative approaches to management (e.g., simple thoracostomy, tube thoracostomy). EMS clinicians must determine when pleural decompression is indicated and optimize the safety and effectiveness of the procedure. Furthermore, there is also ambiguity regarding EMS management of open pneumothoraxes. To provide evidence-based guidance on the management of traumatic pneumothoraxes in the EMS setting, the National Association of EMS Physicians (NAEMSP) performed a structured literature review and developed the following recommendations supported by the evidence summarized in the accompanying resource document.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2416978\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2416978","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prehospital Trauma Compendium: Traumatic Pneumothorax Care: Position Statement and Resource Document of NAEMSP.
Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians manage patients with traumatic pneumothoraxes. These may be simple pneumothoraxes that are less clinically impactful, or tension pneumothoraxes that disturb perfusion, lead to shock, and impart significant risk for morbidity and mortality. Needle thoracostomy is the most common EMS treatment of tension pneumothorax, but despite the potentially life-saving value of needle thoracostomy, reports indicate frequent misapplication of the procedure as well as low rates of successful decompression. This has led some to question the value of prehospital needle thoracostomy and has prompted consideration of alternative approaches to management (e.g., simple thoracostomy, tube thoracostomy). EMS clinicians must determine when pleural decompression is indicated and optimize the safety and effectiveness of the procedure. Furthermore, there is also ambiguity regarding EMS management of open pneumothoraxes. To provide evidence-based guidance on the management of traumatic pneumothoraxes in the EMS setting, the National Association of EMS Physicians (NAEMSP) performed a structured literature review and developed the following recommendations supported by the evidence summarized in the accompanying resource document.
期刊介绍:
Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.