院前创伤简编:创伤性气胸护理 - NAEMSP 的立场声明和资料文件。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
John W Lyng, Caitlin Ward, Matthew Angelidis, Amelia Breyre, Ross Donaldson, Kenji Inaba, Maria J Mandt, Nichole Bosson
{"title":"院前创伤简编:创伤性气胸护理 - NAEMSP 的立场声明和资料文件。","authors":"John W Lyng, Caitlin Ward, Matthew Angelidis, Amelia Breyre, Ross Donaldson, Kenji Inaba, Maria J Mandt, Nichole Bosson","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2416978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians manage patients with traumatic pneumothoraxes. These may be simple pneumothoraxes that are less clinically impactful, or tension pneumothoraxes that disturb perfusion, lead to shock, and impart significant risk for morbidity and mortality. Needle thoracostomy is the most common EMS treatment of tension pneumothorax, but despite the potentially life-saving value of needle thoracostomy, reports indicate frequent misapplication of the procedure as well as low rates of successful decompression. This has led some to question the value of prehospital needle thoracostomy and has prompted consideration of alternative approaches to management (e.g., simple thoracostomy, tube thoracostomy). EMS clinicians must determine when pleural decompression is indicated and optimize the safety and effectiveness of the procedure. Furthermore, there is also ambiguity regarding EMS management of open pneumothoraxes. To provide evidence-based guidance on the management of traumatic pneumothoraxes in the EMS setting, the National Association of EMS Physicians (NAEMSP) performed a structured literature review and developed the following recommendations supported by the evidence summarized in the accompanying resource document.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prehospital Trauma Compendium: Traumatic Pneumothorax Care: Position Statement and Resource Document of NAEMSP.\",\"authors\":\"John W Lyng, Caitlin Ward, Matthew Angelidis, Amelia Breyre, Ross Donaldson, Kenji Inaba, Maria J Mandt, Nichole Bosson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2024.2416978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians manage patients with traumatic pneumothoraxes. These may be simple pneumothoraxes that are less clinically impactful, or tension pneumothoraxes that disturb perfusion, lead to shock, and impart significant risk for morbidity and mortality. Needle thoracostomy is the most common EMS treatment of tension pneumothorax, but despite the potentially life-saving value of needle thoracostomy, reports indicate frequent misapplication of the procedure as well as low rates of successful decompression. This has led some to question the value of prehospital needle thoracostomy and has prompted consideration of alternative approaches to management (e.g., simple thoracostomy, tube thoracostomy). EMS clinicians must determine when pleural decompression is indicated and optimize the safety and effectiveness of the procedure. Furthermore, there is also ambiguity regarding EMS management of open pneumothoraxes. To provide evidence-based guidance on the management of traumatic pneumothoraxes in the EMS setting, the National Association of EMS Physicians (NAEMSP) performed a structured literature review and developed the following recommendations supported by the evidence summarized in the accompanying resource document.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2416978\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2416978","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

紧急医疗服务(EMS)临床医生要处理创伤性气胸患者。这些气胸可能是对临床影响较小的单纯性气胸,也可能是干扰灌注、导致休克并带来重大发病和死亡风险的张力性气胸。针刺胸腔造口术是紧急医疗服务中治疗张力性气胸最常见的方法,但尽管针刺胸腔造口术具有挽救生命的潜在价值,但有报告显示该手术经常被误用,而且减压成功率很低。这导致一些人质疑院前针刺胸腔造口术的价值,并促使人们考虑其他处理方法(如简单胸腔造口术、管式胸腔造口术)。急救临床医生必须确定何时适合进行胸膜减压,并优化手术的安全性和有效性。此外,急救医疗服务对开放性气胸的处理也不明确。为了给紧急医疗服务中的创伤性气胸处理提供循证指导,NAEMSP 进行了结构化的文献综述,并在随附的资料文件中总结的证据支持下,提出了以下建议。NAEMSP 建议:紧急医疗服务对张力性气胸的识别必须以风险因素和体征结果相结合为指导,并可通过诊断技术加以辅助。EMS 临床医生应认识到自主呼吸患者和接受正压通气患者在张力性气胸临床表现上的差异。EMS 临床医生不应为单纯性气胸患者实施胸膜减压术,但应在其执业范围内为张力性气胸患者实施胸膜减压术。在进行针刺胸腔造口术时,EMS 临床医生应根据患者的具体情况,并受已知的影响胸壁厚度和先天性损伤风险的因素的影响。简单胸腔造口术和管式胸腔造口术可由训练有素的 EMS 临床医生在适当的医疗监督和质量保证下在特定的临床环境中使用。如果创伤性院外循环骤停(TOHCA)患者有张力性气胸的临床表现或因胸腹部重大创伤而怀疑有张力性气胸,则应为其进行胸膜减压。在大多数情况下,EMS 临床医生不应在空中医疗转运前对疑似或确诊为单纯性气胸的患者进行常规胸膜减压。对于接受正压通气但有开放性气胸的患者,胸腔封堵可能有害,因此不建议使用。急救医生在制定课程和领导质量管理计划方面发挥着重要作用,既要确保急救临床医生在识别和处理张力性气胸方面接受过适当的培训,又要确保对张力性气胸进行的干预措施是适当、安全和有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prehospital Trauma Compendium: Traumatic Pneumothorax Care: Position Statement and Resource Document of NAEMSP.

Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians manage patients with traumatic pneumothoraxes. These may be simple pneumothoraxes that are less clinically impactful, or tension pneumothoraxes that disturb perfusion, lead to shock, and impart significant risk for morbidity and mortality. Needle thoracostomy is the most common EMS treatment of tension pneumothorax, but despite the potentially life-saving value of needle thoracostomy, reports indicate frequent misapplication of the procedure as well as low rates of successful decompression. This has led some to question the value of prehospital needle thoracostomy and has prompted consideration of alternative approaches to management (e.g., simple thoracostomy, tube thoracostomy). EMS clinicians must determine when pleural decompression is indicated and optimize the safety and effectiveness of the procedure. Furthermore, there is also ambiguity regarding EMS management of open pneumothoraxes. To provide evidence-based guidance on the management of traumatic pneumothoraxes in the EMS setting, the National Association of EMS Physicians (NAEMSP) performed a structured literature review and developed the following recommendations supported by the evidence summarized in the accompanying resource document.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信