创伤和非创伤患者的修订创伤评分与死亡率和院前 LSI 的关系。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Dylan A Defilippi, David D Salcido, Chase W Zikmund, Leonard S Weiss, Andrew Schoenling, Christian Martin-Gill, Francis X Guyette, Michael R Pinsky
{"title":"创伤和非创伤患者的修订创伤评分与死亡率和院前 LSI 的关系。","authors":"Dylan A Defilippi, David D Salcido, Chase W Zikmund, Leonard S Weiss, Andrew Schoenling, Christian Martin-Gill, Francis X Guyette, Michael R Pinsky","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2425382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The combination of broad conditional applicability and ease of data collection make some general risk scores an attractive tool for clinical decision making under acute care conditions. To date, general risk scores have demonstrated moderate levels of accuracy for key outcomes, but there are no definitive general scores integrated universally into prehospital care. The objective of our study was to demonstrate a relationship between the Revised Trauma Score (RTS) and prehospital lifesaving interventions (LSI) and downstream hospital mortality among a large, diverse, multi-year cohort of critical care transport patients. We hypothesized that the RTS is associated with mortality and prehospital LSI generally across all conditions, including non-trauma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study using a pre-established cohort of sequentially enrolled patients from a regional air medical service between the years 2012 and 2021. Pediatric patients, non-transports, and those transported to hospitals outside the regional health system were excluded from the study. Both trauma and non-trauma patients were included in this study. We performed logistic regressions to evaluate the association between RTS and the outcomes of LSI and hospital mortality, while controlling for age, sex, and medical category. Graphs were constructed to plot RTS against prehospital LSI and survival percentage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our final patient cohort was 62,424 patients. 58.4% of all patients required a prehospital LSI. Non-trauma cases made up 69.7% of the patient population. The Revised Trauma Score was inversely proportional with both prehospital LSI and mortality. The logistic regression model yielded an odds ratio (OR) of 0.55 (95% CI 0.54 - 0.56) for the association between RTS and death. Additionally, when the components of RTS were associated with mortality, they each showed a statistically significant OR. The Revised Trauma Score was also associated with prehospital LSI (OR 0.10; 95% CI 0.03 - 0.33).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a large helicopter EMS cohort of both trauma and non-trauma patients, the RTS was inversely associated with prehospital LSI and hospital mortality. The generalized utility of RTS demonstrated in our study warrants further investigation of this measure as a broader triage tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of the Revised Trauma Score with Mortality and Prehospital LSI Among Trauma and Non-Trauma Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Dylan A Defilippi, David D Salcido, Chase W Zikmund, Leonard S Weiss, Andrew Schoenling, Christian Martin-Gill, Francis X Guyette, Michael R Pinsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2024.2425382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The combination of broad conditional applicability and ease of data collection make some general risk scores an attractive tool for clinical decision making under acute care conditions. To date, general risk scores have demonstrated moderate levels of accuracy for key outcomes, but there are no definitive general scores integrated universally into prehospital care. The objective of our study was to demonstrate a relationship between the Revised Trauma Score (RTS) and prehospital lifesaving interventions (LSI) and downstream hospital mortality among a large, diverse, multi-year cohort of critical care transport patients. We hypothesized that the RTS is associated with mortality and prehospital LSI generally across all conditions, including non-trauma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study using a pre-established cohort of sequentially enrolled patients from a regional air medical service between the years 2012 and 2021. Pediatric patients, non-transports, and those transported to hospitals outside the regional health system were excluded from the study. Both trauma and non-trauma patients were included in this study. We performed logistic regressions to evaluate the association between RTS and the outcomes of LSI and hospital mortality, while controlling for age, sex, and medical category. Graphs were constructed to plot RTS against prehospital LSI and survival percentage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our final patient cohort was 62,424 patients. 58.4% of all patients required a prehospital LSI. Non-trauma cases made up 69.7% of the patient population. The Revised Trauma Score was inversely proportional with both prehospital LSI and mortality. The logistic regression model yielded an odds ratio (OR) of 0.55 (95% CI 0.54 - 0.56) for the association between RTS and death. Additionally, when the components of RTS were associated with mortality, they each showed a statistically significant OR. The Revised Trauma Score was also associated with prehospital LSI (OR 0.10; 95% CI 0.03 - 0.33).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a large helicopter EMS cohort of both trauma and non-trauma patients, the RTS was inversely associated with prehospital LSI and hospital mortality. The generalized utility of RTS demonstrated in our study warrants further investigation of this measure as a broader triage tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2425382\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2425382","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:一般风险评分具有广泛的条件适用性和数据收集的简便性,因此是在急诊护理条件下进行临床决策的一种极具吸引力的工具。迄今为止,一般风险评分在关键结果方面已显示出中等程度的准确性,但还没有明确的一般评分被普遍纳入院前护理中。我们的研究目的是证明修订后的创伤评分(RTS)与院前救生干预(LSI)之间的关系,以及大型、多样、多年重症转运患者队列中的下游医院死亡率。我们假设 RTS 与包括非创伤在内的所有情况下的死亡率和院前 LSI 大致相关:我们使用一个预先建立的队列,对 2012 年至 2021 年期间从地区性空中医疗服务机构按顺序登记的患者进行了回顾性观察研究。研究排除了儿科患者、非转运患者以及被转运到地区医疗系统以外医院的患者。本研究同时纳入了创伤和非创伤患者。我们对 RTS 与 LSI 和住院死亡率之间的关系进行了逻辑回归评估,同时控制了年龄、性别和医疗类别。我们还绘制了 RTS 与院前 LSI 和存活率的对比图:我们的最终患者群共有 62424 名患者。所有患者中有 58.4% 需要院前 LSI。非创伤病例占患者总数的 69.7%。修订创伤评分与院前 LSI 和死亡率成反比。逻辑回归模型得出 RTS 与死亡之间的几率比 (OR) 为 0.55(95% CI 0.54 - 0.56)。此外,当 RTS 的各组成部分与死亡率相关联时,它们都显示出具有统计学意义的 OR。修订创伤评分也与院前 LSI 有关(OR 0.10; 95% CI 0.03 - 0.33):结论:在一个由创伤和非创伤患者组成的大型直升机急救队列中,RTS 与院前 LSI 和住院死亡率成反比。我们的研究证明了 RTS 的普遍实用性,因此有必要将其作为更广泛的分诊工具进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of the Revised Trauma Score with Mortality and Prehospital LSI Among Trauma and Non-Trauma Patients.

Objectives: The combination of broad conditional applicability and ease of data collection make some general risk scores an attractive tool for clinical decision making under acute care conditions. To date, general risk scores have demonstrated moderate levels of accuracy for key outcomes, but there are no definitive general scores integrated universally into prehospital care. The objective of our study was to demonstrate a relationship between the Revised Trauma Score (RTS) and prehospital lifesaving interventions (LSI) and downstream hospital mortality among a large, diverse, multi-year cohort of critical care transport patients. We hypothesized that the RTS is associated with mortality and prehospital LSI generally across all conditions, including non-trauma.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study using a pre-established cohort of sequentially enrolled patients from a regional air medical service between the years 2012 and 2021. Pediatric patients, non-transports, and those transported to hospitals outside the regional health system were excluded from the study. Both trauma and non-trauma patients were included in this study. We performed logistic regressions to evaluate the association between RTS and the outcomes of LSI and hospital mortality, while controlling for age, sex, and medical category. Graphs were constructed to plot RTS against prehospital LSI and survival percentage.

Results: Our final patient cohort was 62,424 patients. 58.4% of all patients required a prehospital LSI. Non-trauma cases made up 69.7% of the patient population. The Revised Trauma Score was inversely proportional with both prehospital LSI and mortality. The logistic regression model yielded an odds ratio (OR) of 0.55 (95% CI 0.54 - 0.56) for the association between RTS and death. Additionally, when the components of RTS were associated with mortality, they each showed a statistically significant OR. The Revised Trauma Score was also associated with prehospital LSI (OR 0.10; 95% CI 0.03 - 0.33).

Conclusions: In a large helicopter EMS cohort of both trauma and non-trauma patients, the RTS was inversely associated with prehospital LSI and hospital mortality. The generalized utility of RTS demonstrated in our study warrants further investigation of this measure as a broader triage tool.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信