兽医对猫卵巢蒂扎术标准的使用和看法。

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Journal of veterinary medical education Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI:10.3138/jvme-2024-0004
Hillary A Herendeen, Jennifer W C Turner, Rachael E Kreisler
{"title":"兽医对猫卵巢蒂扎术标准的使用和看法。","authors":"Hillary A Herendeen, Jennifer W C Turner, Rachael E Kreisler","doi":"10.3138/jvme-2024-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ligation of the feline ovarian pedicle is commonly performed via autoligation (\"pedicle tie\") by high-quality high-volume surgeons. It is not commonly taught in veterinary school, resulting in general practice veterinarians who are not comfortable with the technique, despite being faster than double ligation with suture, having very low risk of hemorrhage-related complications, and no increased risk for student surgeons. This study aimed to determine the use of and opinions regarding standard of care (SOC) related to the pedicle tie for feline ovariohysterectomy. An anonymous 23-question survey was targeted to private practice veterinarians via social media from September to November 2021. There were 142 respondents, with 77 indicating the use of the pedicle tie and 65 indicating no use. Of those who used the pedicle tie, most reported learning the technique from either a dedicated high-quality high-volume facility (32%) or a colleague/mentor (32%). Nearly half used it in all cases. They had used it for a median of 5 (IQR 3,8) years, and 99% were comfortable teaching the technique to others. Of those who did not use the pedicle tie, 60% reported that it meets SOC, 14% reported that it does not, and 26% reported that it sometimes meets SOC. Over half of the respondents reported using the pedicle tie. Absence from the veterinary curriculum was the most frequently cited reason for not using the technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":17575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medical education","volume":"51 5","pages":"587-592"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Veterinarian Use of and Sentiment Regarding Standard of Care for Feline Ovarian Pedicle Tie.\",\"authors\":\"Hillary A Herendeen, Jennifer W C Turner, Rachael E Kreisler\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/jvme-2024-0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ligation of the feline ovarian pedicle is commonly performed via autoligation (\\\"pedicle tie\\\") by high-quality high-volume surgeons. It is not commonly taught in veterinary school, resulting in general practice veterinarians who are not comfortable with the technique, despite being faster than double ligation with suture, having very low risk of hemorrhage-related complications, and no increased risk for student surgeons. This study aimed to determine the use of and opinions regarding standard of care (SOC) related to the pedicle tie for feline ovariohysterectomy. An anonymous 23-question survey was targeted to private practice veterinarians via social media from September to November 2021. There were 142 respondents, with 77 indicating the use of the pedicle tie and 65 indicating no use. Of those who used the pedicle tie, most reported learning the technique from either a dedicated high-quality high-volume facility (32%) or a colleague/mentor (32%). Nearly half used it in all cases. They had used it for a median of 5 (IQR 3,8) years, and 99% were comfortable teaching the technique to others. Of those who did not use the pedicle tie, 60% reported that it meets SOC, 14% reported that it does not, and 26% reported that it sometimes meets SOC. Over half of the respondents reported using the pedicle tie. Absence from the veterinary curriculum was the most frequently cited reason for not using the technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of veterinary medical education\",\"volume\":\"51 5\",\"pages\":\"587-592\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of veterinary medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2024-0004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2024-0004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

猫科动物卵巢蒂结扎术通常由高质量、高产量的外科医生通过自动结扎("蒂结扎")来完成。尽管该技术比缝合双结扎更快,出血相关并发症的风险很低,而且不会增加外科医生学生的风险,但兽医学校并不常教授该技术,导致普通兽医对该技术不适应。本研究旨在确定猫卵巢切除术中椎弓根扎术相关护理标准(SOC)的使用情况和意见。2021 年 9 月至 11 月期间,我们通过社交媒体向私人执业兽医进行了一项包含 23 个问题的匿名调查。共有 142 名受访者,其中 77 人表示使用过椎弓根扎带,65 人表示没有使用过。在使用椎弓根扎法的受访者中,大多数人表示是从专门的高质量大批量设施(32%)或同事/导师(32%)那里学习到这一技术的。近一半的人在所有病例中都使用了该技术。他们使用该技术的时间中位数为 5 年(IQR 3-8 年),99% 的人愿意将该技术传授给他人。在不使用椎弓根扎法的受访者中,60% 的人表示符合 SOC 标准,14% 的人表示不符合 SOC 标准,26% 的人表示有时符合 SOC 标准。超过一半的受访者表示使用过椎弓根扎法。不使用该技术的最常见原因是没有参加兽医课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Veterinarian Use of and Sentiment Regarding Standard of Care for Feline Ovarian Pedicle Tie.

Ligation of the feline ovarian pedicle is commonly performed via autoligation ("pedicle tie") by high-quality high-volume surgeons. It is not commonly taught in veterinary school, resulting in general practice veterinarians who are not comfortable with the technique, despite being faster than double ligation with suture, having very low risk of hemorrhage-related complications, and no increased risk for student surgeons. This study aimed to determine the use of and opinions regarding standard of care (SOC) related to the pedicle tie for feline ovariohysterectomy. An anonymous 23-question survey was targeted to private practice veterinarians via social media from September to November 2021. There were 142 respondents, with 77 indicating the use of the pedicle tie and 65 indicating no use. Of those who used the pedicle tie, most reported learning the technique from either a dedicated high-quality high-volume facility (32%) or a colleague/mentor (32%). Nearly half used it in all cases. They had used it for a median of 5 (IQR 3,8) years, and 99% were comfortable teaching the technique to others. Of those who did not use the pedicle tie, 60% reported that it meets SOC, 14% reported that it does not, and 26% reported that it sometimes meets SOC. Over half of the respondents reported using the pedicle tie. Absence from the veterinary curriculum was the most frequently cited reason for not using the technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
30.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Medical Education (JVME) is the peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges (AAVMC). As an internationally distributed journal, JVME provides a forum for the exchange of ideas, research, and discoveries about veterinary medical education. This exchange benefits veterinary faculty, students, and the veterinary profession as a whole by preparing veterinarians to better perform their professional activities and to meet the needs of society. The journal’s areas of focus include best practices and educational methods in veterinary education; recruitment, training, and mentoring of students at all levels of education, including undergraduate, graduate, veterinary technology, and continuing education; clinical instruction and assessment; institutional policy; and other challenges and issues faced by veterinary educators domestically and internationally. Veterinary faculty of all countries are encouraged to participate as contributors, reviewers, and institutional representatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信